Flawed consensus and soft lawfrom the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe to a Future Peace Conference on Ukraine

  1. Fajardo, Teresa 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Journal:
Peace & Security - Paix et Sécurité Internationales (Euromediterranean Journal of International Law and International Relations)

ISSN: 2341-0868

Year of publication: 2025

Issue Title: (2025)

Issue: 13

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Peace & Security - Paix et Sécurité Internationales (Euromediterranean Journal of International Law and International Relations)

Abstract

This contribution to the Liber discipulorum dedicated to Prof. D.J. Liñán Nogueras evaluates the resolutions adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in the aftermath of Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine. This critical analysis serves to present the changes that have taken place in the power, normative and interpretative structures in the international order, highlighting among these changes the flawed consensus reached in the UN General Assembly, the return to automatic majorities and the choice of soft law as a normative response of limited intensity. While the crisis of consensus that manifests itself in norm-creating processes and also in political processes and agreements is at the origin of soft law, it is also a symptom of the frustrated normative vocation of international organisations. This analysis leads to a reflection on how soft law instruments could be used to seek peace in the Ukrainian war, albeit with a flawed consensus. In the case of the 1975 Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), consensus made détente possible; now, consensus, however flawed, can also be an avenue for future solutions, with soft law instruments as a first step.

Bibliographic References

  • ARDANT, PH. and AVRIL, P., “Le Consensus”, Pouvoirs, Revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, Vol. 5, 1978.
  • BEGLOV, S., “Un an après Helsinki”, Le Monde Diplomatique, 1976
  • BOURQUIN, M., “Stabilité et Mouvement dans l'Ordre Juridique International”, Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 1938-II
  • CASTANEDA, J., Legal Effects of United Nations Resolutions, Columbia University Studies in International Organization, Columbia University Press, New York, 1969
  • CHARPENTIER, J., “La procédure de non objection. A propos d'une crise constitutionnelle de l’ONU”, RGDIP, Vol. 70, 1966.
  • DE LACHARRIÈRE, G., “Consensus et Nations Unies”, Annuaire Français de Droit International, Vol. 14, 1968
  • DE LACHARRIÈRE, G., “Le consensus: Essais de definition”, Pouvoirs, Revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, Vol. 5, 1978
  • DE LACHARRIÈRE, G., La Politique Juridique Extérieure, Economica, Paris, 1983
  • FAJARDO DEL CASTILLO, T., Soft Law, Oxford Bibliographies, Oxford University Press, 2014
  • FAJARDO DEL CASTILLO, T., “El Acuerdo de París sobre el Cambio Climático: Sus aportaciones al desarrollo progresivo del Derecho Internacional y las consecuencias de la retirada de los Estados Unidos”, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, Vol. 70/1, 2018
  • IISD, “UN Biodiversity Conference Highlights: Tuesday, 13 December 2022”, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, Vol. 9, No. 796, 22 December 2022
  • LIÑÁN NOGUERAS, D.J., La integración: factor de modificación del concepto de soberanía, doctoral thesis, unpublished, University of Granada, 1978
  • LIÑÁN NOGUERAS, D.J., “Consenso y Legitimidad en la Conferencia sobre la Seguridad y Cooperación en Europa”, Revista de Estudios Internacionales, 1981.
  • LIÑÁN NOGUERAS, D.J., “Algunas consideraciones sobre la evolución de la conciliación”, in PÉREZ GONZÁLEZ, M. (Coord.), Hacia un nuevo orden internacional y europeo: estudios en homenaje al profesor don Manuel Díez de Velasco, Tecnos, Madrid, 1993.
  • MANIN, A., “La Conference sur la Sécurité et la Coopération en Europe”, Notes et Etudes Documentaires de la Documentation Francaise; No. 4.271-4.272, 1976
  • MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ, F., “Security and Cooperation in Europe - the Helsinki Final Act”, Revista de Instituciones Europeas, Vol. 2/3, 1975,
  • MORGENTHAU, H.J., “The Yardstick of National Interest”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 296, 1954
  • PUCHEU, R., “À la recherche du 'consensus'”, Pouvoirs, Revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, Vol. 5, 1978
  • RIGAUD, J., “Réflexions sur la notion de consensus”, Pouvoirs, Revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, Vol. 5, 1978
  • SUY, E., “Role et signification du consensus dans l'élaboration du Droit international”, in Le Droit international a l'heure de sa codification. Études en l'honneur de Roberto Ago, Tome I, Giuffrè, Milan, 1987
  • TORRES BERNÁRDEZ, S., “Réponse au questionnaire relative au rapport sur le Rôle et signification du consensus dans l’élaboration du droit international”, AIDI, Vol. 67, 1997
Data source: Dialnet