Meta-analytic study of implant survival following sinus augmentation

  1. Jessica Cabezas Mojón
  2. Cristina Barona Dorado
  3. Gerardo Gómez Moreno
  4. Fernando Fernández Cáliz
  5. José María Martínez González
Revue:
Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa

ISSN: 1698-6946

Année de publication: 2012

Volumen: 17

Número: 1

Pages: 28

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4317/MEDORAL.16920 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa

Résumé

Objectives: To evaluate graft types used for maxillary sinus augmentation and review success rates of dental implants inserted in these areas, analyzing the graft materials used, implant surface types and the moment of implant placement. Study Design: A meta-analytic study reviewing articles on sinus augmentation published during the last ten years. Results: 3,975 implants placed in sinus augmentations (with bony windows) were registered, of which 3,749 implants survived, a survival rate of 94.3%. Conclusions: When performing sinus augmentation, bone substitute materials are just as effective as autologous bone, whether used alone or in combination with autologous bone. Implant surface treatments can have an important effect on implant survival and it would appear that roughened surfaces are the best option. When implants are inserted simultaneously to grafting, a higher failure rate can be expected. © Medicina Oral S. L.