Análisis multidimensional del feedback pedagógico en entrenamiento en voleibolMultidimensional analysis of pedagogical feedback in volleyball training setting

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, J.A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 3, 111-149.
• Afonso. C., Graça, A., y Mesquita, I. (2003). O conhecimento do treinador a respeito das metodologias de ensino e treino do voleibol na formação. In I. Mesquita, C. Moutinho & R. Faria (Eds.), Investigação em VoleibolEstudos Ibéricos (pp. 22-31). Porto: Faculdade de Ciências do Desporto e Educação Física.
• Botelho, S., Mesquita, I., y Moreno, M.P. (2005). A intervenção verbal do treinador de Voleibol na competição. Estudo comparativo entre equipas masculinas e femininas dos escalões de formação. Portuguese Journal of Sport Sciences, 5(2), 174-183.
• Boyce, A. (1991). The effects of an instructional strategy with two schedules of augmented KP feedback upon skill acquisition of a selected shooting task. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 47-58.
• Carnahn, H., Hall, C., y Lee, T.D. (1996). Delayed Visual Feedback While Learning to Track a Moving Target. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(4), 416-423.
• Chambers, K.L., y Vickers, J.N. (2006). Effects of bandwidth feedback and questioning on the performance of competitive swimmers. Sport Psychologist, 20, 184-197.
• Chen, D. (2001). Trends in augmented feedback research and tips for the practioner. JOPERD: The Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance, 72(1), 32-36.
• Chiviacowsky, S., y Tani, G. (1993). Efeitos da freuência co comnhecimento do resultados na aprendizagem de uma habilidade motora em crianças. Revista Paulista de Educação Física, 7(1), 45-57.
• Clark, S. C. (2005). Frequência de Conhecimento de Resultados e Aprendizagem Motora: Linhas Atuais de Pesquisa e Perspectivas. In Go Tani (Ed.), Comportamento Motor- Aprendizagem e Desenvolvimento (pp. 185-207). São Paulo: Editora Guanabara Koogan.
• Cushion, C.J., y Jones, R.L. (2001). A Systematic Observation of Professional Top-level Youth Soccer Coaches. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(4), 354-378.
• Dardan, G.F. (1997). Demonstrating motor skills – rethinking that expert demonstration. JOPERD: The Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance, 68(6), 31-35.
• DeKnop, P. (1986). Relationship of specified instructional teacher behaviours to student gain on Tennis. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 5, 71-78
• Eghan, T. (1988). The relation of teacher feedback to student achievement in learning selected tennis skill. Louisiana State University: Baton Rouge.
• Fishman, S.E., y Anderson, W.G. (1971). Developing a System for Describing Teaching. Quest, 15(1):9-16.
• Fishman, S., y Tobey, S. (1978). Augmented feedback. In Anderson, W. & G. Barrette (Eds.), What’s Going on in Gym: Descriptive Studies of Physical Education Classes. Monograph 1 (pp. 51-62). Newton, CT: Motor Skills: Theory into Practice.
• Ford, P., Hodges, N.J., Huys, R., y Williams, A.M. (2006). The Role of External Actions-Effects in the Execution of a Soccer Kick: A Comparison Across Skill Level. Motor Control, 10(4), 386-404.
• Freedman, M.P. (2000). Using effective demonstration for motivation. Science and Children, 38(1), 52-55.
• French, K., Werner, P., Rink, J., Taylor, K., y Hussey, K. (1996). The effets of a 3-week unit of tactical, skill, or combined tactical and skill instruction on badminton performance of ninth-grade students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15(4), 418-438.
• Gilbert, W., Trudel, P., Gaumond, S., y Larocque, L. (1999). Development and Application of an Instrument to Analyse Pedagogical Content Interventions of Ice Hockey Coaches. SOSOL: Sociology of Sport Online.2(2).
• Goodwin, J.E., y Meeuwsen, H.J. (1995). Using bandwidth knowledge of results to alter relative frequencies during motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 99-104.
• Graça, A., y Mesquita, I. (2002). A investigação sobre o ensino dos jogos desportivos: Ensinar e aprender as habilidades básicas do jogo. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, 2(5), 67:79.
• Graham, G., Soares, P., y Harrington, W. (1983). Experienced teachers’ effectiveness with intact classes: Na ETU study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2(2), 3-14.
• Hastie, P. (1999). An Ecological Perspective on Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 5(1), 9-29.
• Kwak, E.C. (2005). The immediate effects Various Task presentation types on Middle School Students´ Skill Learning. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 17 (1), 7-17.
• Lee, T.D., Swinnwn, S.P., y Serrien, D.J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest, 46, 328-344.
• Lima, A., Mesquita, I., y Pereira, F. (2007). Análise da informação transmitida pelo treinador, no treino em voleibol. In Actas do 1º congresso Internacional de Jogos Desportivos – Olhares e contextos da performance. Da iniciação ao Rendimento. Porto: Centro de estudos de jogos desportivos, Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto [CDROM].
• Macedo, J., Mesquita, I., y Graça, A. (2003). Concepções e metodologias do ensino do Voleibol-Estudo aplicado em treinadores de do escalão de juvenis feminino. In I. Mesquita, C. Moutinho & R. Faria (Eds.), Investigação em Voleibol-Estudos Ibéricos (pp. 32-40). Faculdade de Ciências do Desporto e Educação Física: Porto.
• Magill, R. (1994). The influence of augmented feedback during skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learner. Quest, 46, 314-327.
• Magill, R. (2001). The effect of augmented feedback on skill learning. In R. Magill (Ed.), Motor Learning Concepts and Applications (6ª ed., pp. 235-245). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
• Magill, R.A., y Schoenfelder-Zohdi, B. (1996). A visual model and knowledge of performance as sources of information for learning a rhythmic gymnastic skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 7-22.
• MarKland, R., y Martinek, T.J. (1988). Descriptive analysis of coach augmented feedback given to high school varsity female volleyball players. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 7, 289-301.
• McCullagh, P., y Caird, J.K. (1990). Correct leaning models and use of knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 107-116.
• Mesquita, I. (1998). A instrução e a estruturação das tarefas no treino de Voleibol: estudo experimental no escalão de iniciados feminino. Porto: FCDEF-UP. Doctoral Thesis presented to Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, of University of Porto.
• Mesquita, I. (2005). A contextualização do treino no Voleibol: a contribuição do construtivismo. In D. Araújo (Ed.), O contexto da decisão táctica. A acção táctica no desporto (pp. 355-378). Lisboa: Visão e Contextos.
• Mesquita, I. (2006). Ensinar bem para aprender melhor o jogo de voleibol. In G. Tani, J.O. Bento e R. Peterson (eds.), Pedagogia do Desporto (pp. 327-344). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Guanabara Koogan.
• Mesquita, I. (2008). A magnitude adaptativa da técnica nos jogos desportivos. Fundamentos para o treino. In F. Tavares, A. Graça, J. Garganta e I. Mesquita (eds.), Olhares e contextos da performance nos jogos desportivos (pp. 93-107). Porto: Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto.
• Mesquita, I., Farias, C., Oliveira, G., y Pereira, F. (2009). A intervenção pedagógica, sobre o conteúdo, do treinador de Futebol. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 23(1) (in press).
• Mesquita, I.; Rosado, A., y Januário (2008). Athlete’s retention of a coach’s instruction before a judo competition. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 7(3), 402-407.
• Metzler, M. (1989). A review of research on time in sport pedagogy. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 8(2), 87-103.
• Pellet, T. L., y Harrison, J. M. (1995). The influence of a Teacher’s Specific, Cogruen, and Corrective Feedback on Female Junior High School Students’ Immediate Volleyball Practice Success. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 53-63.
• Pestana, M., y Gageiro, G. (2005). Análise de Dados para Ciências Sociais-A Complementaridade do SPSS. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo.
• Piéron, M. (1986). Recherche en Enseignement des Activités Physiques: Méthodologie Utilisée à l’Université de Liége. In M. L.Pare, M. Lirette & M. Piéron (Eds.), Méthodologie de la Recherche en Enseignement de l’Activité Physique et Sportive (pp. 93-111). Québec : Université du Québec.
• Pierón, M. (1981). Research on teacher change: effectiveness of teaching a psychomotor task study in a micro-teaching setting. Paper presented at the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance. National Convention, Boston.
• Piéron, M. (1992). Reactions a la prestation (Rétroactions - feedback). In Pédagogie des activités physiques et du sport. Paris: Revue EPS.
• Piéron, M., y Delmelle, R. (1982). Augmented Feed-Back in Teaching Physical Education: Responses from the Athletes. In M. Piéron & J. Cheffers (Eds.), Studying the Teacher in Physical Education (pp. 141-150). Liége: Université de Liége.
• Potrac, P., Jones, R., y Cushion, C. (2007). Understanding power and the coach’s role in professional English soccer: A preliminary investigation of coach behaviour. Soccer e Society, 8, 33-49.
• Rink, J. (1993). Teaching physical education for learning. 2nd edition. Mosby, St. Louis.
• Rink, J. (1994). The Task Presentation in Pedagogy. Quest, 46, 270-280.
• Rink, J., Frensh, K., y Tjeedsma, B.L. (1996). Foundations for the learning and instruction of sport and games. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 399-417.
• Rosado, A., Mesquita, I., Januário, N., y Breia, E. (2008). Athlete’s Retention of Coach’s Instruction on Task Presentation and Feedback. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 8(1), 19-30.
• Schmidt, R.A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
• Schmidt, R.A. (1988). Motor control and learning (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetis.
• Schmidt, R.A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G.E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Amesterdam: Kluwer Academic.
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15, 4-14.
• Siedentop, D. (1991). Developing teaching skills in physical education (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
• Swinnen, S.P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: a review. In H.N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in Motor Learning and Control (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Tabachnick, B. G., y Fidell, L. S. (2000). Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Tani, G., Feudenheim, A.M., Júnior, C.M.M., y Corrêa, U.C. (2005). Aprendizagem Morora: Tendências, Perspectivas e Aplicações. Revista Paulista de Educação Física, 18, 55-72.
• Tertuliano, I., Ugrinowitsch, A., y Corrêa, U. (2007). Efeitos da frequência de feedback na aprendizagem do saque no voleibol. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, 7(3), 328-335.
• Trudel, P., y Brunelle, J. (1985). Les situations d’apprentissage offerts aux joueurs inscrites dans des liges de hockey mineur. L’Association Cannadienne pour la Santé: L’Education Physique et le Loisir, 51, 18-25.
• Ugrinowitsh, H., Tertuliano, I.W., Coca, A.A., Pereira, F.A.Z., y Gimenez, R. (2003). Frequência de feedback como um fator de incerteza na aprendizagem de uma tarefa de preensão. Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento, 11, 41-47.
• Valmor, R., Graça, A., y Nascimento, J. (2008). O conhecimento Pedagógica do Conteúdo: Estrutura e implicações para a formação em Educação Física. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esportes, 22(2), 161-171.
• Weeks, D.L., y Kordus, R.N. (1998). Relative frequency f knowledge of performance and motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 224-230.
• Weiss, M.R., Ebbeck, V., y Rose, D.J. (1992). “Show and tell” in the gymnasium revisited: Developmental differences in modeling and verbal rehearsal effects on motor skills learning and performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61(4), 344-350.
• Werner, P., y Rink, J. (1989). Case studies of teacher effectiveness in second grade physical education. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 8, 280-297.
• Williams, A. M., y Hodges, N. (2005). Practice, instruction and skill acquisition in soccer: Challenging tradition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(6), 637-650.
• Wrisberg, C.A., y Wulf, G. (1997). Diminishing the effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results on generalized motor program learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 17-26.
• Wulf, G., y Shea, C.H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback. In A.M. Williams & N.J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 121-144). New York: Routhedge.
• Yerg, B., y Twardy, B. (1982). Relationship of Specified Instructional Teachers Behaviours to Pupil Gain on a Motor Skill Task.In M. Piéron & J. Cheffers (Eds.). Studying the Teaching in Physical Education (pp. 61-68). Liége: AIESEP.
• Zubiaur, M., Oña, A., y Delgado, J. (1999). Learning volleyball serves: a preliminary study of the effects of knowledge of performance and of results. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 223-232.