Rendimiento académico en asignaturas de tratamiento de aguas: Comparación entre Ingeniería Química y Ciencias Ambientales

  1. Leyva Díaz, Juan Carlos 1
  2. Álvarez Arroyo, Rocío 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Aldizkaria:
RED: revista de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1578-7680

Argitalpen urtea: 2017

Zenbakia: 55

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.6018/RED/55/4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: RED: revista de educación a distancia

Laburpena

As a result of the guidelines from the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) of an education system based on learning more than teaching, this study emerges with the objective of assessing the performance of students intheoretical andpractice learningin Degree in Chemical Engineering and Degree in Environmental Sciences. The study was carried outon 208 total studentsand by selecting two common laboratory practicesand theoretical classesin both degrees. The research concluded the existence of statistically significant differences between the students of both degreesin all aspects evaluated, includingboth the theoretical and practice learning. In thisregard, the students of the Degree in Chemical Engineering showed a success rate which doubled the one got by the students of the Degree in Environmental Sciences, with a higher valuation in the academicperformanceby the students of the Degree in Chemical Engineering. Generally, the students obtained better results in the evaluation of the practice teaching than in the theoretical one, which strengthens the concept of the EHEA consisting of introducing a teaching more applied and focused on the obtaining of competences with future application in the job market.

€ Ikusi finantzaketa

Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa

Finantzatzaile

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Aamodt, P.O., Prøitz, T.S., Hovdhaugen, E., & Stensaker, B. (2007). Learning outcome in higher education. NIFU STEP report 40/2007, Oslo.
  • Aamodt, P.O., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2008). Assessing Higher Education Learning Outcomes as a Result of Institutional and Individual Characteristics. In IMHE General Conference (pp. 1–16). NIFU STEP, Oslo.
  • ANECA (2000a). Plan of study. Degree: Chemical Engineering (University of Granada). Retrieved from http://vicengp.ugr.es/pages/_grados-verificados/38ingenieriaquimicaverificado/!
  • ANECA (2000b). Plan of study. Degree: Environmental Sciences (University of Granada). Retrieved from http://vicengp.ugr.es/pages/_grados-verificados/07cienciasambientalesverificado/!
  • ANECA (2005a). White Book of the Bachelor Degree in Chemical Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.aneca.es/var/media/150264/libroblanco_ingquimica_def.pdf
  • ANECA (2005b). White Book of the Bachelor Degree in Environmental Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.aneca.es/var/media/150340/libroblanco_ambientales_def.pdf
  • Ballester-Sarrias, E., Puyuelo-Cazorla, M., Contat-Rodrigo, L., Gasch-Salvador, M., & Sánchez-Ruiz, L.M. (2012). Analizing students performance in an EHEA BEng Industrial Design Engineering degree. In Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 6462530.
  • Bayón, L., Grau, J.M., Ruiz, M.M., Otero, J.A., & Suárez, P.M. (2013). EEES : Nuevas actividades de Enseñanza / Aprendizaje en asignaturas de Matemáticas. In 2° Congreso virtual sobre tecnología, educación y sociedad (p. 16), México.
  • Bergan, S. (2007). Qualifications. Introduction to a concept. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
  • Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 28(1), 31–44.
  • Buzaglo, G., & Wheelan, S.A. (1999). Facilitating work team effectiveness case studies from Central America. Small Group Res. 30(1), 108–129.
  • European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education (2009). The Bologna Process 2020 The European Higher Education Area in the new decade. In Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education (pp. 1–6), Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve.
  • Fernández-Sainz, A., García-Merino, J.D., & Urionabarrenetxea, S. (2016). Has the Bologna process been worthwhile? An analysis of the Learning Society-Adapted Outcome Index through quantile regression. Stud. High. Educ. 41, 1579–1594.
  • Fitt, D.X., & Heverly, M. (2012). Classroom assessment of student competencies. Assessment Eval. High. Educ. 19, 215–224.
  • González, J., & Wagenaar, R. (2008). Universities´ contribution to the Bologna Process: An introduction. Universidad de Deusto.
  • Gren, L., & Al-Sabbagh, K. (2017). Group Developmental Psychology and Software Development Performance. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, ICSE-C 2017 7965314 (pp. 232–234), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Gren, L., Torkar, R., & Feldt, R. (2017). Group development and group maturity when building agile teams: A qualitative and quantitative investigation at eight large companies. J. Syst. Software 124, 104–119.
  • Hager, P., Gonczi, A., & Athanasou, J. (1994). General issues about assessment of competence. Assessment Eval. High. Educ. 19(1), 3–16.
  • Havnes, A. (2004). Examination and learning: an activity-theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice. Assessment Eval. High. Educ. 29(2), 159–176.
  • Herrero, H., & Algarrada, I. (2010). Is the New ECTS System Better than the Traditional One? An Application to the ECTS Pilot-project at the University Pablo de Olavide. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 204(1), 164–172.
  • Lara, S., & Rivas, S. (2009). Self-regulated learning and promotion of competences in two master-level subjects, by means of assessment templates, case method, role-playing and digital video. Educación XX1 12, 67–96.
  • López-Pastor, V.M., Pintor, P., Muros, & B., Webb, G. (2013). Formative assessment strategies and their effect on student performance and on student and tutor workload: the results of research projects undertaken in preparation for greater convergence of universities in Spain within the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). J. Further High. Educ. 37(2), 163-180.
  • Marcerano, O.D., & Navarro, M.L. (2007). El éxito en la universidad: una aproximación cuantílica. Revista de Economía Aplicada 15(44), 5–39.
  • McClelland, D.C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. Am. Psychol. 28(1), 1–14.
  • Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (2007). Real Decreto 1393/2007, de 29 de octubre, por el que se establece la ordenación de las enseñanzas universitarias oficiales, 260 BOE 25 (2007). Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/10/30/pdfs/A44037-44048.pdf
  • Ministros Europeos de Educación (1999). Declaración de Bolonia. Retrieved from http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/links/language/1999_Bologna_Declaration_Spanish.pdf
  • Molina Álvarez, A.T. (1999). Problemática actual en la enseñanza de la ingeniería: una alternativa para su solución. Ingenierías 2(3), 10–15.
  • Mulder, M., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Wesselink, R. (2009). The new competence concept in higher education: error or enrichment? J. Eur. Ind. Training 33(8/9), 755–770.
  • Ortega Navas, M.C. (2010). Teacher’s emerging competences as a demand of the European Higher Education Area. Revista Española de Educación Comparada 16, 305–327.
  • Richardson, J.T.E., (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ. Res. Rev. 6, 135-147.
  • Rico, M., Coppens, J., Ferreira, P., Sánchez, H., & Agudo, J.A. (2013). Everything Matters: Development of CrossCurricular Competences in Engineering Through Web 2.0 Social Objects Mercedes. In Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age (pp. 139–157), New York.
  • Solanes Puchol, A., Núñez Núñez, R., & Rodríguez Marín, J. (2008). Elaboración de un cuestionario para la evaluación de competencias genéricas en estudiantes universitarios. Apuntes de Psicología 26(1), 35–49.
  • Tembrink, T.D. (2006). Evaluación. Guía práctica para profesores, 8th ed., Narcea, Madrid.
  • Wheelan, S.A. & Tilin, F. (1999). The relationship between faculty group development and school productivity. Small Group Res. 30(1), 59–81.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet