La privatización del servicio urbano de aguateoría y evidencia empírica en el caso de España

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abbott, M., and Cohen, R. (2009): Productivity and efficiency in the water industry, Utilities Policy, 17, 233-244.
• Bel, G., and Fageda, X. (2007): Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies, Local Government Studies, 33 (4), 517-534.
• Bel, G., and Fageda, X. (2009): Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis, Public Choice, 139 (1), 105-119.
• Bel, G., and Fageda, X. (2010): Partial privatisation in local services delivery: An empirical analysis of the choice of mixed firms, Local Government Studies, 36, 129-149.
• Bel, G.; Fageda, X., and Mur, M. (2010):Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños) Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua, Hacienda Pública Espa-ñola, 192 (1), 33-58
• Bel, G.; González-Gómez, F., and Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2015): Does market concentration affect prices in the urban water industry, Environment and Planning C, in press.
• Bel, G., and Miralles, A. (2003): Factors infuencing the privatisation of urban solid waste collection in Spain, Urban Studies, 40 (7), 1323-1334.
• Bel, G., and Warner, M. (2008): Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(12), 1337-1348.
• Boardman, A., and Vining, A. (1989): Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed and State-owned enterprises, Journal of Law and Economics, 32 (1), 1-33.
• Carvalho, P.; Marques, R., and Berg, S. (2012): A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure, Utilities Policy, 21, 40-49.
• Coase, R. (1937):The nature of the frm, Economica, 4 (16), 386-405.
• Corte Costituzionale (2011): Giudizio sull’ammissibilità di referendum. Sentenza 29/2011 and 174/2011.
• Donahue, J. (1989): The privatization decision, Public Ends, Private Means, New York.
• Dore, M.; Kushner, J., and Zumer, K. (2004):Privatization of water in the UK and France: What can we learn?, Utilities Policy, 12, 41-50.
• Eckel, C., and Vining, A. (1985):Elements of a theory of mixed enterprise, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 32(1), 82-94.
• Fattori, T. (2013):From the water commons movement to the commodification of the Public Realm, South Atlantic Quarterly, 112 (2), 377-387.
• Ferreira, N., and Marques R. (2012):Mixed companies and local governance: No man can serve two masters, Public Administration, 90 (3), 737-758.
• Galiani, S.; Gertler, P., and Schargrodsky, E. (2005):Water for life: The impact of the privatization of water services on child mortality, Journal of Political Economy, 113 (1), 83-120.
• García-Valiñas, M. A.; González-Gómez, F., and Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2013):Is the price of water for residential use related to provider ownership? Empirical evidence from Spain, Utilities Policy, 24, 59-69.
• González-Gómez F., and García-Rubio M. A. (2008):Efficiency in the management of urban water services. What have we learned after four decades of research?, Hacienda Pública Española, 185, 39-67.
• González-Gómez, F., and Guardiola, J. (2009):A duration model for the estimation of the contracting out of urban water management in southern Spain, Urban Affairs Review, 44 (6), 886-906.
• González-Gómez, F.; Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., and Guardiola, J. (2011):Why do local governments privatize the provision of water services? Empirical evidence from Spain, Public Administration, 89 (2), 471-492.
• González-Gómez, F.; García-Rubio, M. A., and González-Martínez, J. (2014):Beyond the public-private controversy in urban water management in Spain, Utilities Policy, 31, 1-9.
• Hall, D.; Lobina, E., and Terhorst, P. (2013):Re-municipalisation in the early 21st century: water in France and energy in Germany, International Review of Applied Economics, 27 (2), 193-214.
• Hart, O.; Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1997):The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), 1127-1161.
• Hefetz, A., and Warner, M. (2007):Beyond the market versus planning dichotomy: Understanding privatisation and its reverse in US cities, Local Government Studies, 33(4), 555-572.
• Leibenstein, H. (1966):Allocative efficiency vs. X-efficiency, The American Economic Review, 56 (3), 392-415.
• Littlechild, S. (1988):Economic regulation of privatised water authorities and some further refections, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4 (2), 40-68.
• Lobina, E., and Hall, D. (2000):Public sector alternatives to water supply and sewerage privatization: case studies, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 16 (1), 35-55.
• Lobina, E., and Hall, D. (2001): U.K. water privatization - A briefing, Public Services International Research Unit, Greenwich.
• Lobina, E.; Kishimoto, S., and Petitjean, O. (2014): Here to stay: Water remunicipalisation as a global trend. Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), Transnational Institute (TNI) and Multinational Observatory, UK.
• Lobina, E.; Terhorst, P., and Popov, V. (2011):Policy networks and social resistance to water privatization in Latin America, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10, 19-25.
• Marin, P. (2009): Public-private partnerships for urban water utilities: a review of experiences in developing countries, vol. 8, World Bank Publications, Washington.
• Marques, R. (2010): Regulation of water and wastewater services: An international comparison, IWA Publishing, London.
• Marra, A. (2007):Internal regulation by mixed enterprises: The case of the Italian water sec-tor, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 78 (2), 245-75.
• Martínez-Espiñeira, R.; García-Valiñas, M. A., and González-Gómez, F. (2009):Does private management of water supply services really increase prices? An empirical analysis in Spain, Urban Studies, 46 (4), 923-945.
• Martínez-Espiñeira, R.; García-Valiñas, M. A., and González-Gómez, F.  (2012):Is the pricing of urban water services justifably perceived as unequal among Spanish cities?, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28 (1), 107-121.
• Matés, J. M. (1999):La conquista del agua: historia económica del abastecimiento urbano, Jaén, Universidad de Jaén, Servicio de Publicaciones e intercambio científco.
• Matsumura, T. (2003):Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor, Bulletin of Economic Research, 55 (3), 275-287.
• Mazzoni, D., and Cicognani, A. (2013):Water as a commons: An exploratory study on the motives for collective action among Italian water movement activists, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23 (4), 314-330.
• Miralles, A. (2009):A duration model analysis of privatization of municipal water services, Revista de Economía Aplicada, 17 (50), 47-75.
• Nalbandian, J. (2005):Professionals and the conficting forces of administrative modernization and civic engagement, The American Review of Public Administration, 35 (4), 311-326.
• Niskanen, W. A. (1971): Bureaucracy and representative government, Aldine Atherton, Chicago.
• Niskanen, W. A. (1994): Bureaucracy and public economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, London.OECD (2004): Competition and regulation in the water sector, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, DAFFE/COMP(2004)20, Paris.
• Osborne, M. J., and Slivinski, A. (1996):A model of political competition with citizen-candi-dates, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111 (1), 65-96.
• Pérard, E. (2009):Water supply: Public or private? An approach based on cost of funds, transaction costs, efficiency and political costs, Policy and Society, 27 (3), 193-219.
• Picazo-Tadeo, A. J.; González-Gómez, F.; Guardiola, J., and Ruiz-Villaverde, A. (2012):Do ideological and political motives really matter in the public choice of local services management? Evidence from urban water services in Spain, Public Choice, 151 (1-2), 215-228.
• Picazo-Tadeo, A. J.; González Gómez, F., and Sáez-Fernández, F. J. (2009):Accounting for operating environments in measuring water utilities’ managerial efficiency, The Service Industries Journal, 29 (6), 761-773.
• Picazo-Tadeo, A. J.; Sáez-Fernández, F. J., and González Gómez, F. (2008):Does service quality matter in measuring the performance of water utilities?, Utilities Policy, 6 (1), 309-319.
• Picazo-Tadeo, A. J.; Sáez-Fernández, F. J., and González Gómez, F. (2009):The role of environmental factors in water utilities’ technical efficiency. Empirical evidence from Spanish companies, Applied Economics, 41 (5), 615-628.
• Pigeon, M.; McDonald, D. A.; Hoedeman, O., and Kishimoto, S. (2012): Remunicipalisation: Putting water back into public hands, Amsterdam, Transnational Institute.
• Pigou, A. (1932): The economics of welfare, Macmillan and Co., London.
• Ruiz-Villaverde, A.; García-Rubio, M. A., and González-Gómez, F. (2010):Analysis of urban water management in historical perspective: Evidence for the Spanish case, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26, 653-674.
• Ruiz-Villaverde, A.; Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., and González-Gómez, F. (2013): The social choice of privatising urban water services: a case study of Madrid in Spain, Working Paper WPAE-1309, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia.
• Sáez-Fernández, F. J.; González Gómez, F., and Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2011): Opportunity costs of ensuring sustainability of urban water services, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 27 (4), 693-708.
• Savas, E. (1987): Privatization: The key to better government, Chatham House Publishers.
• Schmitz, P. W. (2000):Partial privatisation and incomplete contracts; the proper scope of government reconsidered, Finanzarchiv, 56 (4), 394-411.
• Suárez-Varela, M. (2015): Está relacionada la efciencia en el servicio urbano de agua con la titularidad del gestor, Agua y Territorio, in press.
• Warner, M. E. (2008), Reversing privatization, rebalancing government reform: Markets, deliberation and planning , Policy and Society, 27 (2), 163-174.