Implicit relational effects in associative recognition

  1. Algarabel, S. 1
  2. Pitarque, A. 1
  3. Cómbita, L.M. 2
  4. Rodríguez, L.A. 2
  1. 1 University of Valencia (Spain)
  2. 2 University of Granada (Spain)
Revista:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 34

Número: 2

Páginas: 163-177

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Resumen

En dos experimentos analizamos la contribución de relaciones implícitas entre palabras sobre el reconocimiento asociativo. En el experimento 1 mostramos una mejora implícita en el reconocimiento cuando las palabras de cada par de estudio compartían letras comunes y eran desemparejadas en el test. Además en la condición de estudio bajo atención dividida la recolección se veía afectada, pero no así el efecto de la familiaridad perceptual. En el experimento 2 replicamos estos resultados bajo atención dividida y mostramos que esta condición no afectaba tampoco a la familiaridad medida a nivel de item individual en una tarea de elección forzosa. Globalmente considerados nuestros resultados muestran que el efecto de familiaridad perceptual hallado es debido a una unificación perceptual de la asociación y no simplemente a un tipo de recuerdo guiado recolectivo.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alameda, J.R., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano [Frequency Dictionary of the linguistic units of Spanish]. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
  • Algarabel, S., Pitarque, A., Tomás, J.M., & Mazón, J. F. (2010). Explorations on familiarity produced by words having specific combinations of letters. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 265-285.
  • Algarabel, S., Escudero, J., Mazón, J., Pitarque, A., Peset, V., & Lacruz, L. (2009). Familiarity-based recognition in the young, healthy elderly, mild cognitive impaired and Alzheimer's patients. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2056-2064.
  • Anderson, N.D., Ebert, P.L., Jennings, J.M., Grady, C.L., Cabeza, R., & Graham, S.J. (2008). Recollection- and familiarity-based memory in healthy aging and amnesic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology, 22, 177-187.
  • Castel, A. D., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. Psychology and Aging, 18, 873-885.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Edition). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Dew, I. T. Z., Bayen, U. J., & Giovanello, K. S. (2007). Implicit relational memory in young and older adults. Journal of Psychology, 215, 25-34.
  • Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2008). The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: Testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 730-740.
  • Dorfman, J. (1999). Unitization of sublexical components in implicit memory for novel words. Psychological Science, 1, 387-392.
  • Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N.J. (2001). From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection: Memory Systems of the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Giovanello, K.S., Verfaellie, M., & Keane, M.M. (2003). Disproportionate deficit in associative recognition relative to item recognition in global amnesia. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 186-194.
  • Giovanello, K. S., Keane, M. M., & Verfaellie, M. (2006). The contribution of familiarity to associative memory in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1859-1865.
  • Graf, P., & Schacter, D.L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 501-518.
  • Kinoshita, S. (1999). Priming for novel associations: Evidence for an attentional component. Memory, 7, 385-404.
  • Levy, D. A., Rabinyan, E., & Vakil, E. (2008). Forgotten but not gone: Context effects on recognition do not require explicit memory for context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1620.
  • Macken, W. J. (2002). Environmental context and recognition: The role of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 153-161.
  • Manier, D., Apetroaia, I., Pappas, Z., & Hirst, W. (2004). Implicit contributions of context to recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 471-483.
  • Mayes, A., Montaldi, D., & Migo, E. (2007). Associative Memory and the medial temporal lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 126-135.
  • Musen, G., & O'Neill, J.E. (1997). Implicit memory for nonverbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1192-1202.
  • Parkin, A., Ward, J., Squires, E., Furbear, H., Clark, A. and Townshend, J. (2001). Data-driven recognition memory: A new technique and some data on age differences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 812-819.
  • Pitarque, A., & Sáez, B. (2012). The role of perceptual information in familiarity-based scene recognition. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 901-909.
  • Quamme, J. R., Yonelinas, A. P., & Norman, K. A. (2007). Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus, 17, 192-200.
  • Reder, L. M., Oates, J. M., Thornton, E. R., Quinlan, J. J., Kaufer, A., & Sauer, J. (2006). Drug-induced amnesia hurts recognition, but only for memories that can be unitized. Psychological Science, 17, 562-567.
  • Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2007). Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia, 45, 412-424.
  • Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition. NeuroImage, 39, 873-884.
  • Staresina, B. P., & Davachi, L. (2006). Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 9162-9172.
  • Stark, C.E., & Squire, L.R. (2003). Hippocampal damage equally impairs memory for single items and memory for conjunctions. Hippocampus, 13, 281-292.
  • Stark, C.E., Bayley, P.J., & Squire, L.R. (2002). Recognition memory for single items and for associations is similarly impaired following damage to hippocampal region. Learning & Memory, 9, 238-242.
  • Turriziani, P., Fadda, L., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, G.A. (2004). Recognition memory for single items and association in amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia 42, 426-433.
  • Westerberg, C.E., Paller, K.A., Weintraub, S., Mesulam, M.M., Holdstock, J.S., Mayes, A.R., et al. (2006). When memory does not fail: Familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology, 20, 193-205.
  • Winograd, E., Karchmer, M. A., & Russell, I. S. (1971). Role of encoding unitization in cued recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 199-206.
  • Wolk, D.A., Signoff, E.D., & DeKosky, S.T. (2008). Recollection and familiarity in amnesic mild cognitive impairment: A global decline in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 4, 1965-1978.
  • Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of reseach. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
  • Yonelinas, A.P., Kroll, N.E.A., Dobbins, I., & Soltani, M. (1999). Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 6, 654-661.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet