El panel de loterías como tarea no paramétrica para la obtención de la actitud frente al riesgo

  1. García Gallego, Aurora
  2. Georgantzis, Nikolaos
  3. Jaramillo Gutiérrez, Ainhoa
  4. Parravano, Paola
Zeitschrift:
Revista internacional de sociología

ISSN: 0034-9712

Datum der Publikation: 2012

Ausgabe: 70

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 53-72

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.3989/RIS.2011.07.1A DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista internacional de sociología

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Abdellaoui, M. 2000. “Parameter-free elicitation of utility & probability weighting functions.” Management Science 46:1497-1512.
  • Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H. and C. Paraschiv. 2007. “Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement.” Management Science 53:1659-1674.
  • Allais, M. 1953. “Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine.” Econometrica 21: 503-546.
  • Andersen, S., Harrison, G., Lau, M. and E. Rutström. 2008. “Eliciting risk and time preferences.” Econometrica 76:583-618.
  • Bechara, A., Damasio. A. R., Damasio, H. and S.W Anderson. 1994. “Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.” Cognition 50:7-15.
  • Berns, G. S., Capra, M., Chappelow, J., Moore, S. and C. Noussair. 2008. “Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes.” Neuroimage 15:2047-2057.
  • Birnbaum, M. H. and J. Navarrete.1998. “Testing descriptive utility theories: Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17:49-78.
  • Bosch-Domènech, A. and J. Silvestre. 2006. “Risk aversion and embedding bias.” Economics Working Papers No. 934. Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Spain.
  • Brañas-Garza, P., Georgantzís, N. and P. Guillén. 2007. “Direct and indirect effects of pathological gambling on risk attitudes.” Judgment and Decision Making 2(2):126-136.
  • Brañas-Garza, P., Guillén, P. and R. López del Paso. 2008. “Math skills and risk attitudes.” Economics Letters 99:332-336.
  • Camerer, C. 1989. “An experimental test of several generalized utility theories.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2(1):61-104.
  • Camerer, C. and T. Ho. 1994. “Violations of betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8:167-196.
  • Campo, S., Guerre, E., Perrigne, I. and Q. Vuong. 2002. “Semiparametric estimation of first-price auctions with risk averse bidders.” Working Paper, University of Southern California.
  • Carbone, E. and J. Hey. 2000. “Which error story is best?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20:161-176.
  • Cox, J. C. and R. L. Oaxaca. 1996. “Is Bidding behavior consistent with bidding theory for private value auctions.” Pp. 131-148 in Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 6, edited by R.M. Isaac. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
  • García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Pereira, P. and J.C. Pernías-Cerrillo. 2005. “Competing against simulated equilibrium price dispersions: An experiment on Internet-assisted search markets.” Working Paper #5-12, NET Institute.
  • García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Navarro-Martínez, D. and G. Sabater-Grande. 2011. “The stochastic component in choice and regression to the mean.” Theory and Decision 71:251-267.
  • García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. and M. Parravano. 2010. “The SGG risk elicitation task: Implementation and results.” The Papers 10/04, University de Granada. Spain.
  • Georgantzís, N., Genius, M., García-Gallego, A. and G. Sabater-Grande. 2003. “Testing for risk return individual decision making.” Working Paper 43/03. LINEEX, University of Valencia. Spain.
  • Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A. and T. Palfrey. 2002. “Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in privatevalue auctions.” Journal of Economic Theory 104(1):247-272.
  • Goeree, J., Holt, C. and T. Palfrey. 2003. “Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennigames.” Games and Economic Behavior 45:97-113.
  • Goldstein, W. and H. Einhorn. 1987. “Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena.” Psychological Review 94:236-254.
  • Harrison, G., List, J. and C. Towe. 2007. “Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of risk aversion.” Econometrica 75:433-458.
  • Harrison, G. W. and E. Rutström. 2009. “Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral.” Experimental Economics 12(2):133-158.
  • Hey, J. and C. Orme. 1994. “Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data.” Econometrica 62:1391-1426.
  • Holt, C. A. and S. K. Laury. 2002. “Risk aversion and incentive effects.” American Economic Review 92(5):1644-1655.
  • Hsu, M., Krajbich, I., Zhao, C. and C. F. Camerer. 2009. “Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities.” Journal of Neuroscience 29:2231-2237.
  • Kanheman, D. and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.” Econometrica 47(2):263-292.
  • Lusk, J. and K. Coble. 2005. “Risk perceptions, risk preference, and acceptance of risky food.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87:393-405.
  • Prelec, D. 1998. “The probability weighting function.” Econometrica 66:497-528.
  • Rabin, M. and R. H. Thaler. 2001. “Anomalies: Risk aversion.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(1): 219-232.
  • Raven, J. C. 1976. Advanced Progressive Matrices. Sets I and II. Oxford: Psychologists Press.
  • Rigas, G., Carling, E. and B. Brehmer. 2002. “Reliability and validity of performance measures in microworlds.” Intelligence 50(5):463-480.
  • Sabater-Grande, G. and N. Georgantzís. 2002. “Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners’ dilemma games: An experimental test.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 48:37-50.
  • Stott, H. 2006. “Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32:101-130.
  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:297-323.
  • Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.
  • Wakker, P. and D. Deneffe. 1996. “Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown.” Management Science 42(8):1131-1150.
  • Wang, M., Rieger, M. O. and T. Hens. 2010. “How time preferences differ: Evidence from 45 countries.” Research Paper No. 09-47. Swiss Finance Institute.
  • Weber, E. U. and C. K. Hsee, C. K. 1998. “Cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk.” Management Science 44(9):1205-1217.
  • Weber, E.U. and C. K. Hsee. 1999. “Models and mosaics: Investigating cross-cultural differences in risk perception and risk preference.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6(4): 611-617.
  • Zukerman, M. 1979. Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. New York: Erlbaum Associates.