Instrucción en el uso de esquemas para la resolución de problemas aditivos a estudiantes con necesidades educativas especiales

  1. Ramos, Laura 1
  2. Castro, Encarnación 1
  3. Castro-Rodríguez, Elena 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

ISSN: 0212-4521 2174-6486

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 34

Número: 1

Páginas: 173-192

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ENSCIENCIAS.1765 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

Resumen

Se presenta un estudio basado en el trabajo de tres estudiantes (17-18 años) con necesidades educativas especiales a los que se les hace una instrucción directa sobre situaciones y problemas aritméticos verbales de suma y resta, de una etapa, mediante el uso de esquemas visuales. El trabajo tiene como objetivo explorar si influye en dichos estudiantes este modelo de implementación de los problemas. Los tres estudiantes presentan tipologías diferentes, por lo que se trata de un estudio de tres casos. El análisis de los datos ha mostrado influencia positiva en los tres estudiantes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguilar, M., Navarro, J.I. y Alcalde, M.C. (2003). El uso de esquemas figurativos para ayudar a resolver problemas aritméticos. Cultura y Educación: Revista de teoría, investigación y práctica, 15(4), 385-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/113564003322712956
  • Bates, E.T. y Wiest, L.R. (2004). Impact of Personalization of Mathematical Word Problems on Student Performance. The Mathematics Educator, 14(2), 17-26.
  • Bruno, A. y Noda, A. (2010). Necesidades Educativas Especiales en Matemáticas. El caso de Personas con Síndrome de Down. En M. M. Moreno, Estrada, A., Carrillo, J., y Sierra, T. (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XIV, 141-162. Lérida: SEIEM.
  • Bryant, D.P., Bryant, B.R. y Hammill, D.D. (2000). Characteristic behaviors of students with L D who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 168-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300205
  • Carpenter, T.P. y Moser, J.M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 179-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748348
  • Castro, E. (2008). Resolución de problemas: ideas, tendencias e influencias en España. En Luengo, R., Gómez B., Camacho M. y Blanco, L. (Eds.), Investigación en educación matemática XII, 113140. Badajoz: Sociedad Española de Investigación en Educación Matemática, SEIEM.
  • Castro, E., Rico, L. y Gil, F. (1992). Enfoques de investigación en problemas verbales aritméticos aditivos. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 10(3), 243-253.
  • De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. y De Win, L. (1985). Influence of rewording verbal problems on children’s problem representation and solutions. Joumal of Educational Psychology, 82, 359-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.4.460
  • Fierro, A. (1987). Desarrollo cognitivo, intervención e integración educativa en los deficientes mentales. Revista de Educación. nº. extraordinario, 105-131.
  • Fuchs, L.S. y Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350060701
  • Fuchs, L.S. y Fuchs, D. (2005). Enhancing Mathematical Problem Solving for Students with Disabilities. The Journal of special education, 39(1), 45-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390010501
  • Fuchs, D. y Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how validis it?. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
  • Fuchs, L.S., Powell, S.R., Seethaler, P.M., Cirino, P.T., Fletcher, J.M., Fuchs, D. y Zumeta, R. O. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 561-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014701
  • Fuchs, L.S., Geary, D.C., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Seethaler, P.M. y Schatsch neider, C. (2010). Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities? Developmental Psychology, 46, 1731-1746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020662
  • Garrett, A.J., Mazzocco, M.M. y Baker L. (2006). Development of the Metacognitive Skills of Prediction and Evaluation in Children with or without Math Disability. Learn Disabil Res Pract, 21(2), 77-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00208.x
  • Geary, D.C. (2004). Mathematics and Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370010201
  • Geary, D.C., Brown, S.C. y Samaranayake, V.A. (1991). Cognitive Addition: A Short Longitudinal Study of Strategy Choice and Speed-of-Processing Differences in Normal and Mathematically Disabled Children. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 787-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.787
  • Gersten, R., Chard, D.J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S.K., Morphy, P. y Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Instructional. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202-1242. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431
  • Gick, M.L. y Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema Induction and Analogical. Transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, l-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
  • Goldin, G.A. y McClintock, C.E. (Eds.). (1979). Task variables in mathematical problem solving. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC/SMEAC.
  • González-Peiteado, M. (2013). Los estilos de enseñanza y aprendizaje como soporte de la actividad docente. Revista Estilos de Aprendizaje, 11(11). Consultado 29/06/2015 en: http://www.uned.es/ revistaestilosdeaprendizaje/numero_11/.
  • Hinton, V., Flores, M.M. y Shippen, M. (2013). Response to Intervention and Math Instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 190-201.
  • Hershkovitz S. y Nesher, P. (2003). The Role of Schemes in Solving Word Problems The Mathematics Educator, 7(2), 1-24.
  • Jitendra, A.K. (2002). Teaching Students Math Problem-Solving Through Graphic Representations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(4), 34-38.
  • Jitendra, A.K. (2011). Cognitive Strategy Instruction for Improving Expository Text Comprehension of Students With Learning Disabilities: The Quality of Evidence Exceptional Children. Disponible en: http://www.readperiodicals.com/201101/2251251431.html#ixzz3PTS623XG Consultado 07/12/2014.
  • Jitendra, A.K., DiPipi, C.M. y Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00224669020360010301
  • Jitendra, A.K., Griffin, C.C. y Deatline-Buchman, A. (2007). Mathematical Word Problem Solving in Third-Grade Classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 283-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.5.283-302
  • Jitendra, A.K., Hof, K. y Beck, M.M. (1997). The Role of Schema-Based Instruction on Solving Multistep Word Problems. Paper Presented at the CEC Annual Convention, Salt Lake. Utah.
  • Jitendra, A.K., Petersen-Brown, S., Lein, A.E., Zaslofsky, A.F., Kunkel, A.K., Jung, P.G., Egan, A.M. (2013). Teaching Mathematical Word Problem Solving: The Quality of Evidence for Strategy Instruction Priming the Problem Structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(10), 1-22.
  • Jitendra, A.K. y Xin, Y.P. (1997). Mathematical word problem-solving instruction for students with mild disabilities and students at risk for math failure: A research synthesis. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 412-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246699703000404
  • Lester, F.K. (1994). Musings about mathematical problem-solving research: 1970-1994. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 660-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749578
  • Ley orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación (LOE). BOE nº 106, de 4 de mayo de 2006, páginas 17158 a 17207.
  • Mancl, D.B. (2011). Investigating the effects of a combined problem-solving strategy for students with learning difficulties in mathematics, UNLV. Theses/Dissertations/ Professional. Paper 927.
  • Marshall, S.P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527890
  • Mayer, R.E. (1980). Cognitive Psychology and Mathematical Problem Solving. Technical Report Series in Learning and Cognition. Report No. 80-1. Department of Psychology University of California. Santa Barbara, California.
  • Molina, M., Castro, E., Molina, J. y Castro, E. (2011). Un acercamiento a la investigación de diseño a través de los experimentos de enseñanza. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 29(1), 75-88. ISSN: 0212-4521.
  • Montague, M. (1991). Gifted and learning-disabled gifted students’ knowledge and use of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal for Education of the Gifted, 14, 393-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016235329101400405
  • Nescher, P., Greeno, J.G. y Riley, M.S. (1982). The development of semantics categories for addition and subtraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 13, 373-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00366618
  • Nesher, P. y Katriel, T.A. (1977). Semantic Analysis of Addition and Subtraction Word Problems in Arithmetic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 251-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00385925
  • Núñez, M.T. (2008). Educación Especial: Normalizar ou volver patolóxicas as diferenzas? Eduga, 57, 20-23.
  • Parmar, R.S., Cawley, J. F. y Frazita, R. R. (1996). Word problem-solving by students with and without mild disabilities. Exceptional Children. Publisher: Council for Exceptional Children Audience: Academic; Professional Format: Magazine/Journal 62(5).
  • Polya, G. (1981). Cómo plantear y resolver problemas. Trillas: México. Powell, S.R. (2011) Solving Word Problems using Schemas: A Review of the Literature. Learning Disabilities. Research & practice. Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children, 26(2), 94-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00329.x
  • Puig, L. y Cerdán, F. (1988). Problemas aritméticos escolares. Matemáticas: cultura y aprendizaje. Madrid. Síntesis.
  • Raven, J.C. (1975). Test de Matrices Progresivas. Escala General. Manual. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
  • Riley, M.S., Greeno, J.G. y Heller, J.I. (1983). Development of Children’s Problem-solving Ability in Arithmetic. En H. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking. Academic Press.
  • Rosenzweig, C., Krawec, J. y Montague, M. (2011). Metacognitive Strategy Use of Eighth-Grade Students with and without Learning Disabilities During Mathematical Problem Solving: A ThinkAloud Analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6), 508-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219410378445
  • Schimizzi, N.V. (1988).Word Problem Solving. What Is Experimental Research Saying about Mathematics Word Problem Solving? A Review of Forty-Four Studies Completed between 1980-1987. Paper presented at the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Annual Conference. Chicago, Illinois.
  • Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academic Press.
  • Schoenfeld, A. y Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a Theory of Proficiency. En Teaching Mathematics. T. Wood (Series Ed.) y D. Tirosh (Vol. Ed.). International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 2. Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Sense Publishers.
  • Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching Mathematics: Using research-informed strategies. Australian Council for Educational Research. ACER Press.
  • Sweeney, C.M. (2010). The metacognitive functioning of middle school students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving. A Dissertation. Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Miami in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of Miami.
  • Tzur, R., Johnson, H.L., McClintock, E., Kenney, R.H., Xin, Y.P., Si, L., Woordward J., Hord, C. y Jin, X. (2013). Distinguishing schemes and tasks in children’s development of multiplicative reasoning. PNA, 7(3), 85-101.
  • Vergnaud, G. (1982). A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of thought involved in addition and subtraction problems. En T. Carpenter, J. Moser y T. Romberg. Addition and subtraction. A cognitive perspective. pp. 39-59. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Warnock, M. (1987). Encuentro sobre Necesidades de Educación Especial. Revista de Educación, núm. extraordinario, 45-79.
  • Willis, G.B. y Fuson, K. C. (1988). Teaching Children to use Schematic Drawings to Solve Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 192-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.192
  • Woodward, J. y Brown, C. (2006). Meeting the Curricular Needs of Academically Low-Achieving Students in Middle Grade Mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 151-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400030301
  • Xin, Y.P., Jitendra, A. y Deatline-Buchman, A. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 181-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390030501