¿Cuál es el test de campo de correr/caminar más válido para estimar la capacidad cardiorrespiratoria?
ISSN: 1989-841X
Ano de publicación: 2016
Número: 28
Páxinas: 9-11
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Revista Internacional de Deportes Colectivos
Resumo
The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to compare the criterion-related validity of the walk/run field tests for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness. Relevant studies were searched from seven electronic databases and other additional sources (snowballing, reference citations, researchers´ publications and contact by email). Afterwards, the Hunter-Schmidt’s (2015) psychometric meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the criterion-related validity of the following walk/run field tests: 5,000 m, 3 miles, 2 miles, 3,000 m, 1.5 miles, 1 mile, 1,000 m, ½ mile, 600 m, 600 yd, ¼ mile, 15 min, 12 min, 9 min, and 6 min. The results of the present study showed that the criterionrelated validity of the 1.5 mile (rp = 0.79, 0.73-0.85) and 12 min (rp = 0.78, 0.72-0.83) walk/run tests was statistically significantly higher than those tests with shorter protocols.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Mayorga-Vega, D., Aguilar-Soto, P., Y Viciana J. Criterion-related validity of the 20-m shuttle run test for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2015. Vol. 14, nº 3, pp. 536-547.
- Schmidt, F. L. Y Hunter, J. E. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. 3nd ed. California: Sage, 2015.