A multimodal analysis of cognitive tools portraying terrorist affairs

  1. Mª Enriqueta Cortés de los Ríos 1
  2. Patricia Fernández Alonso 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Almería
    info

    Universidad de Almería

    Almería, España

    ROR https://ror.org/003d3xx08

Revista:
LFE: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos

ISSN: 1133-1127

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 23

Número: 2

Páginas: 359-383

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: LFE: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos

Resumen

A multimodal analysis of the communication of terrorism has scarcely been tackled. This study aims to explore how verbal and pictorial modes contribute to the creation of a particular conceptualization of terrorism by means of cognitive tools on different front covers of The Economist, the prestigious business and current affairs magazine. The analysis has been structured according to the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Metonymy and Multimodal Discourse (among others, see Lakoff & Johnson, 1980; Johnson, 1987; Evans & Green, 2006; and Forceville, 2009, 2012). Our method of analysis focuses on Forceville (1996, 2009, 2012) and Forceville & Urios-Aparisi (2009), who provide clear instructions for the identification of cognitive devices in multimodal discourse. The data collection for the analysis consists of ten of this magazine’s covers, published in the period 2014-2016, dealing with terrorist attacks and immigration. The results of this analysis reveal that metaphors, metonymies and image schemas are more prevalent in the visual than the verbal mode. This shows how important pictorial representations have become to the communication of terrorism. The use of metonymies is greater than metaphors. By means of the WAR and JOURNEY domains and the use of the FIRE domain to reinforce the former, the terrorist situation is cognitively represented. Colours, considered as cognitive tools which fulfill the evaluative meaning of a particular topic, have also been taken into account. In our analysis they stand out as a sign of negativity reinforcing the horrors of war and the threat towards the people trying to escape an uncertain future.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barcelona, A. (2000). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de
  • Bhatia, A. (2009). The Discourses of Terrorism. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 279-289.
  • Caballero, R. & Suárez-Toste, E. (2008). Translating the Senses. Teaching the Metaphors in Winespeak. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology (pp. 241-259). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Charteris-Black, J. & Musolff, A. (2003). Battered ‘Hero’ or Innocent Victim’? A Comparative Study of Metaphors for Euro trading in British and German Financial Reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 153-176.
  • Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign. Discourse and Society, 17(5), 563-581.
  • Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. (2010). Cognitive Devices to Communicate the Economic Crisis: An Analysis through Covers in The Economist. Ibérica, 20, 81-106.
  • Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. & Azzahara, F. (2014).The Construction of Conceptual Meaning in Print Footwear Ddvertisements. LSP, Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and Cognition, 5(2), 4-23.
  • Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. & Corral Hernández, A. (2016). The Promotion of Health and Beauty Tourism through Websites: A Linguistic Analysis. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 2(22), 62-83.
  • Croft, W. & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cruz García, L. (2016). New Perspectives on the Translation of Advertising. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 2(22), 9-13.
  • Cuadrado Esclapez, G. (2005). Análisis semántico-cognitivo de las metáforas utilizadas en la expresión de los fenómenos del universo. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 1, 85-106.
  • Díez Velasco, O. (2001). Metaphor, Metonymy, and Image-Schemas: An Analysis of Conceptual Interaction Patterns. Journal of English Studies, 3, 47-63.
  • Eggerstsson, G. & Forceville, C. (2009). Multimodal Expressions of the ‘Human Victim is Animal’ Metaphor in Horror Films. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 429-49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Feldman, J. (2006). From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.
  • Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 462-482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist Framework: Agendas for Research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp.19-42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Forceville, C. (2012). Creativity in Pictorial and Multimodal Advertising Metaphors. In R. Jones (Ed.), Discourse and Creativity (pp. 113-132). Harlow: Pearson/Longman.
  • Forceville, C. (2016). Visual and Multimodal Metaphor in Film: Charting the Field. In K. Fahlenbrach (Ed.), Embodied Metaphors in Film, Television and Video Games: Cognitive Approaches (pp. 17- 32). London: Routledge.
  • Forceville, C. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Gibbs, R. & Coslton, H. (2006). The Cognitive Psychological Reality of Image Schemas and their Transformations. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (pp. 239-268). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Goossens, L. (1995). Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action. In L. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A. Simon-Vandenbergen & J. Vanparys (Eds.), By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 33) (pp. 159-174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Gudrun, H. (2005). Magazine Covers. A Multimodal Pretext-Genre. Folia Linguistica, 39(1), 173-196.
  • Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Judge, A. (2005). Manipulative Metaphors in Response to Terrorism: Semantic and Strategic Confusion from Mixed Metaphors <http://www.laetusinpraesens.org/musings/cuibon08.php> [9/02/2017].
  • Kheovichai, B. (2015). Metaphorical scenarios in business science discourse. Ibérica, 29, 155-178.
  • Koller, V. (2009). Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In Forceville, C. & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp.45-71). Berlin: Mouton de
  • Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
  • Krzeszowski, T.P. (1993). The Axiological Parameter in Preconceptual Image Schemata. In R.A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (pp. 307-330). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
  • Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Langer, T. (2015). Metaphors in Economics: Conceptual Mapping Possibilities in the Lectures of Economics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 308-317.
  • Negro Alousque, I. (2014). Pictorial and Verbo-Pictorial Metaphor in Spanish Political Cartooning. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 57, 59-84.
  • O’Halloran, K. L., et al. (2016). Interpreting Text and Image Relations in Violent Extremist Discourse: A Mixed Methods Approach for Big Data Analytics. Terrorism and Political Violence (pp. 1–21). <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2016.1233871>[9/02/2017].
  • Panther, K.; Thornburg, L. & Barcelona, A. (2009). Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Paul, P. (2002). Color By Numbers. American Demographics, 24(2), 30-36.
  • Pavlíková, K. (2015). (Counter)terrorism Metaphors in the Speeches of Barack Obama (Master‘s Diploma Thesis). Masaryk University.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & Otal Campos, J. L. (2002). Metonymy, Grammar, and Communication. Granada: Comares.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & Pérez Hernández, L. (2011). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, Developments and Challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 1–25.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & Galera Masegosa, A. (2014). Cognitive Modeling. A Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Silaski, N. & Durovic, T. (2010). Catching the Inflation by the Tail: Animal Metaphoric Imagery in the Conceptualisation of Inflation in English. Ibérica, 20, 57-80.
  • Spencer, A. (2012). The Social Construction of Terrorism: Media, Metaphors and Policy Implications. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15(3), 393-419.
  • Turner, M. (1991). Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ungerer, F. (2000). Muted Metaphors and the Activation of Metonymies in Advertising. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 321-340). Berlin: Mouton de
  • Ungerer, F. & Schmid, H. J. (1996). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.
  • Velasco Sacristán, Mª S. & Cortés de los Ríos, Mª E. (2009). Persuasive Nature of Image Schematic Devices in Advertising: Their Use for Introducing Sexism. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 22, 239-270.
  • Ventola, E. Cassily, C. & Kaltenbacher, M. (2004). Perspectives on Multimodality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • White, M. (1996). La metáfora en el tratamiento de la crisis monetaria en la prensa británica. Madrid: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Wang, M. (2007). Interaction of Image and Language in the Construction of the Theme “Terrorist Threat” in Newspaper Texts: A Critical Study of Media Discourse. US-China Foreign Language, 5(8), 1-12.
  • Yang, J. & Zhang, Y. (2014). Representation Meaning of Multimodal Discourse. A Case Study of English Editorials in The Economist. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(12), 2564-2575.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet