Análisis bayesiano de barreras al emprendimiento en la universidad

  1. Ana María Ruíz-Ruano García 1
  2. María del Pilar Casado Belmonte 2
  3. Jorge López Puga 1
  1. 1 UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia
  2. 2 Universidad de Almería
    info

    Universidad de Almería

    Almería, España

    ROR https://ror.org/003d3xx08

Aldizkaria:
Revista de educación

ISSN: 0034-8082

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Zenbakia: 386

Orrialdeak: 63-88

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2019-386-427 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de educación

Laburpena

The creation of small and medium business is one of the work alternatives available to university graduates in any area of knowledge, as well as a mechanism through which university professors can transfer useful or relevant knowledge to society. Given that entrepreneurship is considered a key element to boost societies and optimize the economic system, the promotion or facilitation of the creation of companies at the university level can be considered desirable. There are multiple strategies designed to sponsor entrepreneurship and some of the most relevant, both theoretical and practical, are based on models of attitudinal changes. Recent theoretical models in the study of entrepreneurship point out that the perception of obstacles by potential entrepreneurs can explain creation and entrepreneurial intention. This work uses inference and Bayesian networks to model the impact of different potential obstacles on the intention and creation of companies between university professors and students. A sample of 2671 professors and 1224 university students (1744 were women and 1917 were men) completed a survey to identify the perceived potential obstacles to business creation. The R bnlearn statistical package was used to estimate structural models of the Bayesian network that modeled creation and entrepreneurial intention based on perceived obstacles. The results show that professors and students differentially perceive potential barriers to entrepreneurship. While professors create companies despite certain perceived obstacles, the intention and creation of companies is inhibited in the students according to the perceived obstacles. These results can be used to improve the university entrepreneurship empowerment programs and to optimize the chances of success in potential entrepreneurs originating at the university.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Abbott, A., Zastrow, M., Gibney, E., & Nordling, L. (2014, 16 de octubre). The university experiment: campus as laboratory. Nature, 514, 288- 291. doi: 10.1038/514288a
  • Altman, N. & Krzywinski, M. (2018). The course(s) of dimensionality. Nature Methods, 15, 339-400. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0019-x
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. En D. Albarracín, B. T. Hohnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The hadnbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Anscombe, F. J. (1961). Bayesian statistics. The American Statistician, 15, 21-24. doi: 10.2307/2682504
  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.
  • Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
  • Barba-Sánchez, V., & Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. (2018). Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24, 53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.04.001
  • Bernal, A. (2014). Competencia emprendedora e identidad personal. Una investigación exploratoria con estudiantes de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Revista de Educación, 363, 384-411. doi: 10.4438/1988- 592X-RE-2012-636-192
  • Block, J. H., Hoogerheide, L., & Thurik, R. (2013). Education and entrepreneurial choice: An instrumental variables analysis. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 31(1), 23-33. doi: 10.1177/0266242611400470
  • Bolstad, W. M. (2007). Introduction to Bayesian statistics (2nd Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Borbera, D., Lekovic, B., & Berber, N. (2014). Comparative analysis of entrepreneurship barriers: findings from Serbia and Montenegro. Inzinerine Ekonomika–Engineering Economics, 25(2), 167-176. doi: 10.5755/j.01.ee.25.2.3113
  • Cohen, J. (1994). The Earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Cowell, R. G., Dawid, A. P., Lauritzen, S. L., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1999). Probabilistic networks and expert systems. Harrisonburg, VA: Springer.
  • Crum, M., & Chen, Y. (2015). Self-employment and subjective well-being: A multi-country analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 19, 53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.04.001
  • Deh, I. Y., Yeboah, S., & Agyemang, I. K. (2013). The link between demographics and perceive barriers to entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 1, 42-50.
  • Dohse, D., & Walter, S. G. (2012). Knowledge context and entrepreneurial intentions among students. Small Business Economics, 39, 877-895. doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-9324-9
  • Editorial Nature (2014, 16 de Octubre). Universities challenged. Nature, 514, 273. doi: 10.1038/514273a
  • Edwards, W., & Fasolo, B. (2001). Decision technology. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 581–606.
  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Cantisano, B. R. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
  • Glassman, A. M., Moore, R. W., Rossy, G. L., Neupert, N. K., Jones, D. E., & Harvey, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurship. Views on balancing the Acropolis and the Agora. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4), 353-374. doi: 10.1177/1056492603258979
  • Haller, M. K., & Welch, E. W. (2014). Entrepreneurial behavior of academic scientists: network and cognitive determinants of commitment to grant submissions and award outcomes. Entrepreneurhip Theory and Practice, 38, 807-831. doi: 10.1111/etap.12022
  • Halsey, L. G., Currant-Everett, D., Vowler, S. L., & Drummond, G. B. (2015). The fickled P value generates irreproducible results. Nature Methods, 12, 179-185. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3288
  • Henry, C., Hill, F., & Leitch, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part I. Education + Training, 47(2), 98-111. doi: 10.1108/00400910510586524
  • Iakovleva, T. A., Kolvereid, L., Gorgievsky, M. J., & Sørhang, Ø. (2014). Comparison of perceived barriers to entrepreneurship in eastern and western european countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18, 115-133. doi: 10.1504/IJEIM.2014.062874
  • JASP Team (2018). JASP (Version 0.8.6) [Computer software]. Jefatura del Estado. (2001). Ley Orgánica 6/2001, de 21 de diciembre, de
  • Universidades. BOE núm. 307. Madrid, España. Recuperado el 1 abril 2018 de: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2001/BOE-A-2001-24515- consolidado.pdf
  • Jefatura del Estado. (2005). Real Decreto 415/2015, de 29 de mayo, por el que se modifica el Real Decreto 1312/2007, de 5 de octubre, por el que se establece la acreditación nacional para el acceso a los cuerpos docentes universitario. BOE núm. 144. Madrid, España. Recuperado el 1 abril 2018 de: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2015/06/17/pdfs/ BOE-A-2015-6705.pdf
  • Jefatura del Estado. (2006). Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. BOE núm. 106. Madrid, España. Recuperado el 1 de abril de 2018 de: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2006/05/04/pdfs/A17158- 17207.pdf
  • Jefatura del Estado. (2013). Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa. BOE núm. 295. Madrid, España. Recuperado el 1 abril 2018 de: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2013/ BOE-A-2013-12886-consolidado.pdf
  • Jeffreys, H. (1948). Theory of probability (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jeon, M., & De Boeck, P. (2017). Decision qualities of Bayes Factor and p value-based hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 22, 340-360. doi: 10.1037/met0000140
  • Jones, O., Macpherson, A., & Woollard, D. (2008). Entrepreneurial ventures in higher education. International Small Business Journal, 26, 683-708. doi: 10.1177/0266242608096089
  • Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 577-598. doi: 10.111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x
  • Lüthje, C., & Franke, N. (2003). The ‘making’ of an entrepreneur: testing a model of entrepreneurial intent amogn engineering students at MIT. Research and Development Management, 33(2), 135-147.
  • López, J. (2009). Modelos predictivos en actitudes emprendedoras: análisis comparativo de las condiciones de ejecución de las redes bayesianas y la regresión logística. Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Almería. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10835/356
  • Marina, J. A. (2010). La competencia de emprender. Revista de Educación, 351, 49-71.
  • Mars, M. M. (2009). College student eco-entrepreneurship: a social movement perspective. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, 20, 153-172. doi: 10.1108/S1048- 4736(2009)0000020010
  • Ministerio de Industria, Economía y Empresa (2014). José Manuel Soria y José Ignacio Wert presentan la segunda edición del programa Iniciativa Emprendedora en la universidad. [online] Disponible en: http://www.minetur.gob.es [Recuperado el 3 de Abril de 2018].
  • Ministerio de Industria, Economía y Empresa (2015). Los ministros de Industria, Energía y Turismo y de Educación, Cultura y Deportes presentan la tercera edición del programa Iniciativa Emprendedora en la universidad. [online] Disponible en: http://www.minetur.gob.es [Recuperado el 3 de Abril de 2018].
  • Nabi, G., Walmsley, A., Liñán, F., Akhtar, I., & Neame, C. (2016). Does entrepreneurship education in the first year of higher education develop entrepreneurial intentions? The role of learning and inspiration. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 452-467. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1177716
  • Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114
  • Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M., & Jsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54, 442-454. doi: 10.1016/j. euroecorev.2009.08.002
  • Orlitzky, M. (2012). How can significance tests be deinstitutionalized? Organizational Research Methods, 5, 199-228.
  • Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship at universities: academic entrepreneurs’ assessment of policy programs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 319-340. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00291.x
  • Plaschka, G. R., & Welsch, H. P. (1990). Emerging structures in entrepreneurship education: Curricular designs and strategies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(3), 55-71.
  • Puga, J. L., Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. (2015). Points of Significance: Bayesian networks. Nature Methods, 12, 799-800. doi: 10.1038/ nmeth.3550
  • Robinson, P. B., Stimpson, D. V., Huefner, J. C., & Hunt, H. C. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15, 13-31.
  • Rueda, I., Fernández-Laviada, A., & Herrero, A. (2014). Intención de emprendedimiento: ventajas e inconvenientes percibidos. Academia. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 27, 284-315. doi: 10.1108/ARLA-09-2013-0144
  • Rueda, I., Sánchez, L., Herrero, A., Blanco, B., & Fernández-Laviada, A. (2013). ¿Existen niveles adecuados de formación y financiación que incentiven la intención emprendedora? Revista FIR, FAEDPYME International Review, 2(3), 28-38.
  • Rodeiro, D., Fernández, S., Rodríguez, A., & Otero, L. (2012). La financiación de la investigación como motor del emprendimiento académico: análisis de las patentes universitarias. Revista de Educación, 357, 203- 229. doi: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-357-058
  • Ruiz-Ruano, A. M. (2015). Aprendizaje estructural de redes bayesianas para modelar el emprendimiento académico de base sostenible y tecnológica. Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10952/1556
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.
  • Sánchez, J. C. (2011). Entrepreneurship as a legitimate field of knowledge. Psicothema, 23, 427-432.
  • Santos, A. (2013). Fuga de cerebros y crisis en España: los jóvenes en el punto de mira de los discursos empresariales. AREAS Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, 32, 125-137.
  • Santos, A., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, D. (2015). Fuga de cerebros y biografías low cost: nueva etapa en la precarización de la juventud. Recerca, Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi, 16, 13-33. doi: 10.6035/Recerca.2015.16.2
  • Santos, A., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, D. (2017). La subjetivación del capital humano: la movilidad como inversión en los discursos de los jóvenes universitarios que han protagonizado la fuga de cerebros. AREAS Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, 36, 127-139.
  • Sardeshmukh, S. R., & Smith-Nelson, R. M. (2011). Educating for an Entrepreneurial Career: Developing OpportunityRecognition Ability. Australian Journal of Career Development, 20(3), 47-55. doi: 10.1177/103841621102000308
  • Scutari, M. (2010). Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 35(3), 1-22. doi: 10.18637/ jss.v035.i03
  • Scutari, M., & Denis, J. B. (2014). Bayesian networks: with examples in R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Shapero, A. (1985). Why entrepreneurship? A worldwide perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 23(4), 1-5.
  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 566-591. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002
  • Stern, H. S. (2016). A test by any other name: P-values, Bayes Factors and statistical inference. Multivariate Behaviour Research, 51, 23-39. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1099032
  • Toledano, N. (2006). Las perspectivas empresariales de los estudiantes universitarios: un estudio empírico. Revista de Educación, 341, 803- 825.
  • Van Praag, C. M., & Versloot, P. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economy, 29, 351-382. doi: 10.1007/s11187-007-9074-x
  • Van Zyl, C. J. J. (2018). Frequentist and bayesian inference: a conceptual premier. New Ideas in Psychology, 51, 44-49. doi: 10.1016/j. newideapsych.2018.06.004
  • Von Graevenitz, G., Harhoff, D., & Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrepreneurship education. Jorunal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(1), 90-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.015
  • Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129- 133. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
  • Watson-Capps, J. J., & Cech, T. R. (2014, 16 de Octubre). Academia and industry: companies on campus. Nature, 514, 297-298. doi: 10.1038/514297a
Datuen iturria: Dialnet