Validation of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in adults with a same-sex partner

  1. Cristóbal Calvillo
  2. María del Mar Sánchez-Fuentes
  3. Tesifón Parrón-Carreño
  4. Juan Carlos Sierra
Revista:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Any de publicació: 2020

Volum: 20

Número: 2

Pàgines: 140-150

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCHP.2019.07.005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

Antecedentes/Objetivo El Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire (IEMSSQ) es uno de los escasos instrumentos que evalúan la satisfacción sexual desde un modelo teórico y ha sido validado con éxito en población española heterosexual. El objetivo de este estudio es adaptar y examinar sus propiedades psicométricas (fiabilidad, evidencias de validez e invarianza según orientación sexual y sexo) en adultos gais con una relación de pareja. Método: Una muestra de 1.820 adultos, de los cuales el 50% son gais/lesbianas y el 55% hombres, contestó a la versión española del IEMSSQ. Además, los sujetos con orientación gay contestaron el Massachusetts General Hospital-Sexual Functioning Questionnaire y la Escala de Ajuste Diádico. Resultados: El IEMSSQ posee una estructura invariante estricta, por sexo y orientación sexual. Su fiabilidad es buena, y las evidencias de validez de constructo y concurrente adecuadas, aunque moderadas en los componentes de igualdad. Conclusiones: El IEMSSQ permite comparar la satisfacción sexual entre hombres gais y mujeres lesbianas y heterosexuales, presentando buenas propiedades psicométricas en adultos gais, constituyendo un instrumento útil en el ámbito clínico y en el de la investigación.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Arcos-Romero, A. I., & Sierra, J. C. (2019). Factorial invariance, differential item functioning, and norms of the Orgasm Rating Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 19, 57---66, 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.11.001
  • Arcos-Romero, A. I., & Sierra, J. C. (2020). Factors associated with subjective orgasm experience in heterosexual relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46, 314---329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2019.1711273
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238---246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • Byers, E. S., & Macneil, S. (2006). Further validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 32, 53---69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00926230500232917
  • Cabin, R., & Mitchell, R. (2000). To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: When and how are the questions. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81, 246---248. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20168454
  • Calvillo, C., Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., & Sierra, J. C. (2018). Revisión sistemática sobre la satisfacción sexual en parejas del mismo sexo. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 9, 115---136. http://dx.doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2018.02.018
  • Castellanos-Torres, E., Álvarez-Dardet, C., Ruiz-Muñoz, D., & Pérez, G. (2013). Social determinants of sexual satisfaction in Spain considered from the gender perspective. Annals of Epidemiology, 23, 150---156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.12.010
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodnessof-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233---255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902 5
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cohen, J. N., Byers, E. S., & Walsh, L. P. (2008). Factors influencing the sexual relationships of lesbians and gay men. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 162---176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19317610802240105
  • Coleman, E. M., Hoon, P. W., & Hoon, E. F. (1983). Arousability and sexual satisfaction in lesbian and heterosexual women. The Journal of Sex Research, 19, 58---73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224498309551169
  • Duffy, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1986). Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 1---23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v12n02 01
  • Fava, M., Rankin, M. A., Alpert, J. E., Nierenberg, A. A., & Worthington, J. J. (1998). An open trial of oral sildenafil in antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 67, 328---331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000012299
  • Guillot-Valdés, M., Guillén-Riquelme, A., & Buela-Casal, G. (2019). Reliability and validity of the Basic Depression Questionnaire. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 19, 19, 243---250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.07.002
  • Holmberg, D., & Blair, K. L. (2009). Sexual desire, communication, satisfaction, and preferences of men and women in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 46, 57---66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490802645294
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1---55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Kelley, K. (2018). MBESS: The MBESSR Package. R package version(4.4.3 Retrieved from. https://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=MBESS
  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1998). Sexual behavior in the human male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press (Original published 1948).
  • Kurdek, L. A. (1991). Correlates of relationship satisfaction in cohabiting gay and lesbian couples: Integration of contextual, investment, and problem-solving models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 910---922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.910
  • Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986). Relationship quality of partners in heterosexual married, heterosexual cohabiting, and gay and lesbian relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 711---720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.711
  • Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267---285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
  • Lawrance, K., Byers, E. S., & Cohen, J. N. (2011). Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (3rd ed., pp. 525---530). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936---949. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111---121. http://dx.doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857
  • Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847---862.
  • Péloquin, K., Byers, S. E., Callaci, M., & Tremblay, N. (2019). Sexual portrait of couples seeking relationship therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45, 120---133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12328
  • Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 37---40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01221
  • Peplau, L. A., Cochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M. (1997). A national survey of the intimate relationships of African American lesbians and gay men: A look at commitment, satisfaction, sexual behavior, and HIV disease. In B. Greene (Ed.), Ethnic and cultural diversity among lesbians and gay men (Vol. 3) (pp. 11---38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Peters, G. (2018). Userfriendlyscience: Quantitative analysis made accessible. R package version 0.7.2 Retrieved from. http://userfriendlyscience.com
  • Pew Research Center. (2018). Eastern and Western Europeans differ on importance of religion, views of minorities, and key social issues Retrieved from. https://www.pewforum.org/2018/10/29/eastern-and-western-europeans-differ-on-importanceof- religion-views-of-minorities-and-key-social-issues
  • R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software] Retrieved from. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
  • Ritter, L. J., Morris, H. R., & Knox, D. (2018). Who´s getting the best sex? A comparison by sexual orientation. Sexuality & Culture, 22, 1466---1489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9538-y
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1---36. RStudio Team. (2018). RStudio: Integrateddevelopment for r[Computer software], RStudio: Integrateddevelopment for r[Computer software]. Boston, MA: RStudio Inc.
  • Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Salinas, J. M., & Sierra, J. C. (2016). Use of an Ecological Model to study sexual satisfaction in a heterosexual Spanish sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1973---1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0703-9
  • Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., & Santos-Iglesias, P. (2016). Sexual satisfaction in spanish heterosexual couples: Testing the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 42, 223---242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1010675
  • Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., Byers, E. S., & Sierra, J. C. (2015). Validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction questionnaire in a Spanish sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 52, 1028---1041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.989307
  • Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2014). A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14, 67---75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70038-9
  • Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., & Sierra, J. C. (2015). Sexual satisfaction in a heterosexual and homosexual Spanish sample: The role of socio-demographic characteristics, health indicators, and relational factors. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 30, 226---242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2014.978275
  • Santos-Iglesias, P., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2009). Propiedades psicométricas de una versión breve de la Escala de Ajuste Diádico en muestras españolas. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 501---517.
  • Schmiedeberg, C., & Schröder, J. (2016). Does sexual satisfaction change with relationship duration? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 99---107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0587-0
  • Scott, S. B., Ritchie, L., Knopp, K., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2018). Sexuality within female same-gender couples: Definitions of sex, sexual frequency norms, and factors associated with sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 681---692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1077-3
  • Sierra, J. C., Moyano, N., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Gómez-Berrocal, C. (2018). An abridged Spanish version of Sexual Double Standard Scale: Factorial structure, reliability and validity evidence. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18, 69---80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.05.003
  • Sierra, J. C., Vallejo-Medina, P., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Lameiras Fernández, M. (2012). Validación del Massachussets General Hospital-Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (MGH-SFQ) en población espa˜nola. Atención Primaria, 44, 516---524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2012.02.004
  • Spanier, G. B. (2017). DAS. Escala de Ajuste Diádico (R. Martín-Lanas, A. Cano-Prous and M. I. Beunza-Nuin, adapters). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
  • Tavares, I. M., Schlagintweit, H. E., Nobre, P., & Rosen, N. O. (2019). Sexual well-being and perceived stress in couples transitioning to parenthood: A dyadic analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 19, 198---208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.07.004
  • Velten, J., Scholten, S., & Margraf, J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women and Men (SESII-W/M) and the Sexual Excitation Scales/Sexual Inhibition Scales Short Form (SIS/SES-SF) in a population-based sample in Germany. PloS One, 13, e0193080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193080
  • Ventura-León, J. (2018). Intervalos de confianza para coeficientes omega: propuesta para el cálculo. Adicciones, 30, 77---78. http://dx.doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.962
  • Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., & Yovel, I. (2007). Estimating h for structures containing two group factors: Perils and prospects. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 135---157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621606291558
  • Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 21---29. http://dx.doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet