Multimedia annotations for practical collaborative reasoning

  1. Manuel Cebrián-de-la-Serna 1
  2. María Jesús Gallego-Arrufat 2
  3. Violeta Cebrián-Robles 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Málaga
    info

    Universidad de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/036b2ww28

  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  3. 3 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 10

Número: 2

Páginas: 264-278

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7821/NAER.2021.7.664 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

La educación universitaria requiere que los estudiantes se formen tanto en la universidad como en prácticas externas. Debido a la Covid-19, la disponibilidad de recursos multimedia y ejemplos de contextos prácticos se ha convertido en vital. La anotación multimedia puede ayudar a los estudiantes a reflexionar sobre el mundo profesional, colaborando e interactuando con colegas online. Este estudio tiene como objetivo fomentar el pensamiento práctico colaborativo mediante el empleo de nuevas tecnologías de anotación en vídeo. 274 estudiantes participaron en un experimento de diseño de tareas centrándose en el análisis de un galardonado proyecto de innovación educativa de base tecnológica. Con un diseño de investigación mixto, se recogieron datos cualitativos y cuantitativos exportados de la plataforma de anotación en vídeo. Los resultados muestran diferencias en la calidad y la cantidad de las respuestas: en las tareas con folksonomía ancha, son más numerosas, pero más dispersas en su análisis, y viceversa. La calidad de las respuestas dadas con folksonomía estrecha también es mayor tanto en el modo de texto como en el de vídeo. La producción de anotaciones multimedia constituye una manera práctica de animar a los estudiantes a llevar a cabo un razonamiento reflexivo acerca de la realidad profesional.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Becker, K. (2010). The Clark-Kozma Debate in the 21st Century. CNIE 2010: Heritage Matters: Inspiring Tomorrow. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51439897.pdf
  • Bianco, S., Ciocca, G., Napoletano, P., & Schettini, R. (2015). An interactive tool for manual, semiautomatic and automatic video annotation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 131, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2014.06.015
  • Buendía, L., Colás, P., &Hernández, F. (1998).Métodos de investigación en psicopedagogía. McGrawHill.
  • Cebrián, D., Pérez, R., & Cebrián, M. (2017). Estudio de la comunicación en la evaluación de los diarios de prácticas que favorecen la argumentación. Revista Practicum, 2(1), 1– 21. Retrieved from https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/iop/article/view/8262 https://doi.org/ 10.24310/revpracticumrep.v2i1.8262
  • Cebrián, M. (2017). Recursos tecnológicos para un Ple-portafolios multimedia de calidad para el prácticum y las prácticas externas. Reppe. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/AbjWPz
  • Chen, L., Chen, G.-C., Xu, C.-Z., March, J., & Benford, S. (2007). EmoPlayer: A media player for video clips with affective annotations. Interacting with Computers, 20(1), 17–28. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2007.06.003
  • Colasante, M. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 27–27. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.983
  • Debbag, M., & Fidan, M. (2020). Examination of Text and Video-Formatted Learning Diaries in the Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/ 10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.1
  • Dennen, V. P., Bagdy, L. M., & Cates, M. L. (2018). Effective Tagging Practices for Online Learning Environments: An Exploratory Study of Tag Approach and Accuracy. Online Learning, 22(3), 22–22. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i3.1471
  • Dias-Pereira-Dos-Santos, A., Loke, L., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2018). Exploring Video Annotation as a Tool to Support Dance Teaching. Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 448–452). https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292194
  • FundaciónTelefónica. (2016). Top 100 Innovaciones educativas 2016 Educar para la sociedad digital. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/um5aWX
  • Gao, F. (2013). A Case Study of Using a Social Annotation Tool to Support Collaboratively Learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.002
  • Gayoso-Cabada, J., Sarasa-Cabezuelo, A., & Sierra-Rodríguez, J.-L. (2019). A review of annotation classification tools in the educational domain. Open Computer Science, 9(1), 299–307. https:// doi.org/10.1515/comp-2019-0021
  • Godoy, D., & Corbellini, A. (2016). Folksonomy Based Recommender Systems: A State of the Art Review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(4), 314–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/ int.21753
  • Hefter, M. H., & Berthold, K. (2020). Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction? Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106404. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2020.106404
  • Hsu, I.-C. (2013). Integrating ontology technology with folksonomies for personalized social tag recommendation. Applied Soft Computing, 13(8), 3745–3750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc .2013.03.004
  • Imran, A. S., Cheikh, F. A., & Kowalski, S. J. (2016). Automatic Annotation of Lecture Videos for Multimedia Driven Pedagogical Platforms. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 8(4), 550–580.
  • Kandari, A., Qattan, A. M. A., & M, M. (2020). E-Task-Based Learning Approach to Enhancing 21st-Century Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instructional Media, 13(1), 551– 566. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13136a
  • Lau, S. B. Y., Lee, C. S., & Singh, Y. P. (2015). A Folksonomy-based Lightweight Resource Annotation Metadata Schema for Personalized Hypermedia Learning Resource Delivery. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745429
  • Lee, H. Y., & List, A. (2019). Processing of texts and videos: A strategy-focused analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12328
  • List, A. (2018). Strategies for Comprehending and Integrating Texts and Videos. Learning and Instruction, 57, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.008
  • List, A., & Ballenger, E. E. (2019). Comprehension across mediums: the case of text and video. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 514–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528 -018-09204-9
  • Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2014). Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test. System, 45, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.05.005
  • Martínez, J. D. G., Rigo, E., & Jiménez, R. (2017). Multimedia and Textual Reading Comprehension: Multimedia as Personal LearningEnvironment’s Enriching Format. Journal ofNewApproaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.180
  • McFadden, J., Ellis, J., Anwar, T., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Beginning Science Teachers’ Use of a Digital Video Annotation Tool to Promote Reflective Practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 458–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9476-2
  • Mirriahi, N., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2018). Effects of instructional conditions and experience on student reflection: a video annotation study. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1245–1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1473845
  • Mirriahi, N., Liaqat, D., Dawson, S., & Gašević, D. (2016). Uncovering student learning profiles with a video annotation tool: reflective learningwith andwithout instructional norms. Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, 64(6), 1083–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016 -9449-2
  • Monedero, J. J., Cebrián, D., & Desenne, P. (2015). Usability and Satisfaction in Multimedia Annotation Tools for MOOCs. Comunicar, 22(44), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.3916/c44-2015-06
  • Muellner, L. (2015). Annotations and theAncient Greek Hero: Past, Present, andFuture. Comunicar, 22(44), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3916/c44-2015-05
  • Novak, E., Razzouk, R., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.002
  • Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of Epistemic Beliefs and Scientific Argumentation in Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977– 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701545919
  • Özçinar, H. (2015). Scaffolding computer-mediated discussion to enhance moral reasoning and argumentation quality in pre-service teachers. Journal of Moral Education, 44(2), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2015.1043875
  • Paradis, J., & Fendt, K. E. (2016). Annotation Studio: Digital Annotation as an Educational Approach in the Humanities and Arts, White Paper. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/TfacQEC
  • Pérez-Torregrosa, A. B., Díaz-Martín, C., & Ibáñez-Cubillas, P. (2017). TheUse of Video Annotation Tools in Teacher Training. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 458–464. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.090
  • Po-Sheng, C., Hsin-Chin, C., Yueh-Min, H., Chia-Ju, L., Ming-Chi, L., & Ming-Hsun, S. (2018). A Video Annotation Learning Approach to Improve the Effects of Video Learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297 .2016.1213653
  • Qarabash, H., Heslop, P., Kharrufa, A., Balaam, M., & Devlin, M. (2019). Group tagging: Using video tagging to facilitate reflection on small group activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1913–1928. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12691
  • Sauli, F., Cattaneo, A., & van der Meij, H. (2018). Hypervideo for educational purposes: a literature review on a multifaceted technological tool. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(1), 115– 134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2017.1407357
  • Smith, B. K., Blankinship, E., & Lackner, T. (2000). Annotation and education. IEEE Multimedia, 7(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/93.848437
  • Su, A. Y. S., Yang, S. J. H., Hwang, W. Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). A Web 2.0-based Collaborative Annotation System for Enhancing Knowledge Sharing in Collaborative Learning Environments. Computers & Education, 55(2), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008
  • Sydnor, J. (2016). Using Video to Enhance Reflective Practice: Student Teachers’ Dialogic Examination of Their Own Teaching. The New Educator, 12(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1547688x.2015.1113346
  • Zhu, X., Chen, B., Avadhanam, R., Shui, H., & Zhang, R. (2020). Reading and Connecting: Using Social Annotation in Online Classes. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/2nmxp
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet