Spanish adaptation of the self- and other-interest inventory in academic settings

  1. Raimundo Aguayo-Estremera 2
  2. Cristina Miragaya-Casillas 1
  3. Manuel Correa Gómez 1
  4. Alberto Ruiz-Villaverde 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 24

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2021.29 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

In the study of human motivations, self-interest is often seen as a determining factor and opposed to otherinterest. Recently a new conceptualization has been proposed in which both interests can occur at the same time. In order to measure these constructs, the Self-and Other-Interest Inventory (SOII; Gerbasi&Prentice, 2013) was created, which has one version for adults and one for students. Due to the absence of similar measurement instruments in Spain, the aim of this work is to adapt the SOII to Spanish university students. Several studies were conducted. First, the construct was analyzed through rational-analytical procedures. Second, the items were translated following an iterative forward-translation design. Finally, evidence of validity was obtained through analytical procedures. Specifically, two pilot studies were carried out in which two independent samples of Spanish students participated (N1 = 119; N2 = 165). In both studies descriptive analyzes of the items were performed, reliability was estimated and the factor structure of the SOII was explored from an exploratory factor analysis . The results showed adequate reliability and a two-factor solution consistent with the original.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología [A classification system for research designs in psychology]. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038–1059. https:// doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511.
  • Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Haranburu, M. (2007). La adaptación de instrumentos de medida de unas culturas a otras: Una perspectiva práctica [The adaptation of measuring instruments from one culture to another: A practical perspective]. Psicothema, 19(1), 124–133.
  • Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. Guilford Publications.
  • Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. A. Schroeder, L. A. Penner, J. F. Dovidio, & J. A. Piliavin (Eds.), The psychology of helping and altruism: Problems and puzzles. McGraw-Hill.
  • Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.40.2.290.
  • Camerer, C. F. (2011). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press.
  • Camerer, C. F., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209–219.
  • Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), 1579-1601. http://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.x.
  • Cialdini, R. B. (1991). ¿Altruismo o egoísmo? Esa es (todavía) la cuestión [Altruism or selfishness? That is (still) the question]. Investigación Psicológica, 2(2), 124–126.
  • Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS ONE, 10(4), Article e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0121945.
  • Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2017). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085241.
  • Elosua, P.,Mujika, J., Almeida, L. S., &Hermosilla, D. (2014). Procedimientos analítico-racionales en la adaptación de tests. Adaptación al español de la batería de pruebas de razonamiento [Judgmental-analytical procedures for adapting tests: Adaptation to Spanish of the Reasoning Tests Battery]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0120-0534(14)70015-9.
  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.159.
  • Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7.
  • Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. http://doi.org/10.1162/ 003355399556151.
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with item response theory. Technical report. Departament de Psicologia Universitat Rovira i Virgili. https://psico.fcep.urv.cat/utilitats/factor/ documentation/technicalreport.pdf.
  • Frank, R. H., Gilovich T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.2.159.
  • Frey,B.S.,&Meier, S. (2003).Arepolitical economists selfish and indoctrinated? Evidence from a natural experiment. Economic Inquiry, 41(3), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbg020.
  • Gerbasi, M. E., & Prentice, D. A. (2013). The Self-and OtherInterest Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033483.
  • Hernández, A., Drasgow, F., & González-Romá, V. (2004). Investigating the functioning of a middle category by means of amixed-measurementmodel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.687.
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1985). Against parsimony: Three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. Economics and Philosophy, 1(1), 7–21. http://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0266267100001863.
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1997). The passions and the interests: Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton University Press.
  • International Test Commission. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (Second Edition). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15305058.2017.1398166.
  • Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2013.349.
  • Lemon, J., & Grosjean, P. (2015). prettyR: Pretty Descriptive Stats (R package version 2.2.) https://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=prettyR.
  • Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: Una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada [Exploratory Item Factor Analysis: A practical guide revised and updated].Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151–1169. https:// doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361.
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2: A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497–498. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0146621613487794.
  • Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology, 4(2), 73–79. https:// doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73.
  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewnees and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530. https:// doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519.
  • Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición [Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition]. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/ 10.7334/psicothema2013.24.
  • Murphy, K. R., Myors, B., & Wolach, A. (2014). Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests (4th Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781315773155.
  • Myers, D. G., & Twenge, J. M. (2017). Exploring social psychology. McGraw Hill.
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. J. (1995). Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill.
  • R Core Team. (2018).R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review, 1281–1302.
  • Revelle W. (2020). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (R package version 2.0.12.) https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
  • Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure: An alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327906mbr1404_2.
  • Rosenbusch, H., Wanders, F., & Pit, I. L. (2020). The Semantic Scale Network: An online tool to detect semantic overlap of psychological scales and prevent scale redundancies. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 380–392. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/met0000244.
  • Schaeffer, N. C., & Presser, S. (2003). The science of asking questions. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 65–88. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.110702.110112.
  • Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., & Piliavin, J. A. (1995). The psychology of helping and altruism: Problems and puzzles. McGraw-Hill.
  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. http://doi.org/10.1214/ aos/1176344136.
  • Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 195–206. http://doi.org/10.1257/ jep.2.4.195.
  • Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353.
  • Urbina, D. A., & Ruiz-Villaverde, A. (2019). A critical review of homo economicus from five approaches. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ajes.12258.
  • Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02293557.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet