Estudio de los videopóster mediante anotaciones de vídeo como metodología para eventos científicos

  1. Ruiz Rey, Francisco José 1
  2. Cebrián Robles, Violeta 2
  3. Cebrián de la Serna, Manuel 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Málaga
    info

    Universidad de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/036b2ww28

  2. 2 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

  3. 3 Universidad Internacional de Andalucía
    info

    Universidad Internacional de Andalucía

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/058nh3n50

Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
RED: revista de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1578-7680

Ano de publicación: 2021

Volume: 21

Número: 67

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.6018/RED.478951 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Outras publicacións en: RED: revista de educación a distancia

Resumo

Online scientific meetings motivated by Covid19 have been a very common practice recently. This modality is not new, but today, due to its growth, it requires stable and experienced technological solutions. In one year, much progress has been made in different functions in videoconferencing systems, as well as in new formulas for presenting scientific papers, such as videoposters, which, using emerging video annotation technologies, allow greater interaction and discussion of scientific papers in an online event. The study analyzes the quantity and quality generated by discussions between authors and listeners at a videoposter presentation table versus a face-to-face one. The evaluation of the experiment is performed under a descriptive study of quantitative and qualitative data, and content analysis techniques "Q-analysis" of the 450 annotations and 355 interventions in the 16 videoposters of an online event. We found twice the production of participation in the video-poster modality compared to face-to-face communications, while listing a relevant number of benefits offered by videoposters for the development of online events and professional learning networks.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bayram, L. (2012). Use of online video cases in teacher training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1007-1011. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.770
  • Bolívar-Botía, A. (2015). Un liderazgo pedagógico en una comunidad que aprende. Padres y Maestros, 361, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.14422/pym.i361.y2015.004
  • Bozdag, A. D. (2008). A new technique for presentation of scientific works: video in póster. World Journal of Surgery, 32(7), 1559-1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9446-z
  • Brown, Ch. & Poortman C. L., (Eds.), (2018). Networks for Learning: Effective Collaboration for Teacher, School and System Improvement. London: Routledge.
  • Buendía Eisman, L., Colás Bravo, P., & Hernández Pina, F. (1998). Métodos de investigación en psicopedagogía. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Calandra, B., & Rich, P. J. (2014). Digital video for teacher education: Research and practice. Routledge.
  • Cogan-Drew, D. (2009). VideoPaper in context: case reports from the field. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 299–313. http://doi.org/10.1080/14759390903255585
  • De Simone, R., Rodrian, J., Osswald, B., Sack, F. U., De Simone, E., & Hagl, S. (2001). Initial experience with a new communication tool: the ‘Digital Interactive Poster Presentation’. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 19(6), 953-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00694-7
  • Evi-Colombo, A., Cattaneo, A. & Bétrancourt, M. (2020). Technical and Pedagogical Affordances of Video Annotation: A literature Review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29(3), 193-226. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/215718/
  • Duarte-Freitas, M.C.D.; Schmid, A. L.; Tavares, S. F. (2014) Estratégia na comunicação científica na forma de vídeo póster. In: Teixeira, Borba. (Org.). Administração, Direito e Tecnologia: a serviço da cidadania. 1ed.Curitiba: Instituto Memoria, v. 1, p. 220-246
  • Hartmann, S. B. (2017). The Potentials of Using Cloud Computing in Schools: A Systematic Literature Review. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 190–202. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v16i1/16117.pdf
  • Hoagg, C. C., Elterman, D. S., & Macneily, A. E. (2006). Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. The Journal of Urology, 176 (6), 2624-2629.
  • Kalir R & Garcia, A., (2021). Annotation. The MIT Press (ed.). https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/annotation
  • Ingram, J. (2014). Supporting Student Teachers in Developing and Applying Professional Knowledge with Videoed Events. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 51-62. http://doi.org/tp7
  • Kemczinski, A., Cebrián-Robles, D. & Duarte-Freitas, M. (2017). Difusión y colaboración del conocimiento científicos mediante anotaciones en vídeo-póster. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 347–354. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/184630
  • Klieger, A. (2016). The Use of Social Networks to Employ the Wisdom of Crowds for Teaching. TechTrends, 60(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0020-0
  • Krumsvik, R., & Smith, K. (2009). Videopapers - an attempt to narrow the notorious gap between theory and practice in teacher education. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 269–278. http://doi.org/10.1080/14759390903255544
  • Martínez-Romera, D. & Cebrián-Robles, D. (2019). Análisis videográfico para la evaluación de los aprendizajes en las prácticas externas de la formación inicial de docentes de secundaria. Revista Universitaria de Investigación Educativa, 55(2), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.873
  • Migliore, M. (2010). A new method for póster presentation: Integrating digital-picture-frame and vídeo player. Ann Ital Chir, 81(1), 63-4.
  • Monedero-Moya, J.J., Cebrian-Robles, D. & Desenne, Philip. (2015). Usabilidad y satisfacción en herramientas de anotaciones multimedia para MOOC. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 22(44), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-06.
  • OCDE (2003). Education at a Glance OECD indicators. https://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33703760.pdf
  • Picci, P., Calvani, A. & Bonaiuti, G. (2012). Teachers’ perspectives on innovation: tutorship and videoannotation. Spring University. Changing Education in a Changing Society. Klaipedos Universitetas, Lithuania.
  • Powell-Ruck, J., Leach, S., & Maccready, L. (2002). Electronic póster presentations in BAPEN— a controlled evaluation. Clinical Nutrition, 21(3), p. 261-263.
  • Rich, P. & Hannafin, M. J. (2009). Video annotation tools Technologies to scalfold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher of Education, 60 (1), 52-67. doi:10.1177/0022487108328486.
  • Schleicher, A. (2020). The impact of covid-19 on education insights from education at a glance 2020. OECD. https://cutt.ly/OzKVn2G
  • Shek, M.MP., Leung, KC. & To, P.YL. (2021). Using a video annotation tool to enhance student-teachers’ reflective practices and communication competence in consultation practices through a collaborative learning community. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10480-9
  • Smith, B. E., Kiili, C., & Kauppinen, M. (2016). Transmediating argumentation: Students composing across written essays and digital videos in higher education. Computers & Education, 102, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.08.003
  • Silva, R.; Santos, L. & Duarte-Freitas, M. (2008). Reflexão teórica e conceitual sobre produto informacional e produto de informação. Bento Gonçalves: VIII Seprosul - Semana de Engenharia de Produção SulAmericana.
  • Tomás, J., & Seidel, T. (2013). The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom BoD – Books on Demand.
  • Tripp, T. R., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28 (5), 728. Doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.011
  • Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
Fonte de datos: Dialnet