Interacción farmacéutico-paciente en la farmacia comunitaria, en particular, con el proceso y aplicación

  1. Sabater Galindo, Marta
Dirigida por:
  1. Daniel Sabater Hernández Directora
  2. Shalom I. Benrimoj Director/a
  3. Fernando Martínez Martínez Director

Universidad de defensa: Universidad de Granada

Fecha de defensa: 02 de diciembre de 2016

Tribunal:
  1. María José Faus Dáder Presidenta
  2. José Luis Arias Mediano Secretario
  3. Eduardo L. Mariño Hernández Vocal
  4. Cecilia Fernández Lastra Vocal
  5. Olivier Bugnon Vocal

Tipo: Tesis

Resumen

1.1 Introduction The relationship between a healthcare professional and a patient has been demonstrated to directly influence health outcomes.[1-3] Similarly, a patient-centeredness approach has proven to significantly improve patient experience of the health system.[4-8] The emerging trend for delivering patient-centred services in community pharmacy has led to an increased interest in the relationship between the pharmacist and the patient.[9-13] Research on the pharmacist-patient relationship has been approached from different perspectives, including how the relationship impacts patient satisfaction, health outcomes, or how patient’s health behaviour is modified.[8, 12, 14-22] However, no theoretical model for the community pharmacist-patient relationship appears to have been developed.[23] Theoretical models of other healthcare professional-patient relationships may be a reasonable starting point for constructing such a theory. On the other hand, the provision of professional services in community pharmacy, intended to improve health outcomes and the quality use of medicines, could also affect patients’ overall perception of the pharmacist.[24-29] This perception could be defined as the patient’s impression or idea of the community pharmacist as a healthcare professional and it has been labelled as the “Perceived pharmacist image”. However, despite some pharmacists are already providing services, some studies show that patients’ expectations of pharmacists still appear to be related to their dispensing role.[25, 30] Patients are still unaware what professional services a pharmacist is able to provide, are not interested in those professional services or prefer other professionals to deliver them.[31-33] Therefore, it is important to understand patients´ perception and expectations of the pharmacist in order to know and meet those expectations, and to provide efficient professional services.[25, 34] 1.2 Objectives The thesis approaches the relationship between the community pharmacist and the patient through the identification of healthcare professional-patient relationship theoretical models; as well as through the development and test of two conceptual models that explain patients´ perception and expectations of the pharmacist. Specifically, this Doctoral Thesis is structured into three research studies, which specific objectives are: 1. To identify healthcare professional-patient relationship theoretical models and individual influential factors that impact on this relationship and could be relevant to pharmacy practice. 2. To develop and test a conceptual model of the patient’s perception of the image of the community pharmacist 3. To develop and test a conceptual model of patient’s expectations of the role of the community pharmacist. Methods, results and discussion of these research studies are presented as a compilation of scientific articles. 1.3 Healthcare professional-patient relationships: systematic review of theoretical models from a community pharmacy perspective Abstract: Objective: To identify health care professional-patient relationship theoretical models and individual factors that may have an influence on this relationship and be relevant to community pharmacy practice. Methods: Using the recommended methodology by Prisma statement, a search was undertaken in PubMed for health care professional-patient relationship theoretical models that included individual factors. Results: Eight theoretical models met the inclusion criteria. These models were classified based on their aim, their focus on the interaction process, external factors influencing the process, and their practical applications. The most common influential modifiable factors were knowledge, needs, values, expectations, beliefs and perceptions. Conclusion: ‘The Theory of Goal Attainment‘ (TGA) appears to be the most useful model for community pharmacy practice. The perceptions and expectations of both patients and pharmacists could be the two most interesting modifiable factors to apply in pharmacy practice. These modifiable influential factors could be altered by specific training such as behavioural aspects. Practice Implications: No theoretical model has been specifically developed for analysing the community pharmacist-patient relationship. TGA may be appropriate for community pharmacy practice, since it takes into consideration both, attaining patient´s health outcomes, as well as improving patient-pharmacist relationship. 1.4 Patients´ expectations of the role of the community pharmacist: development and testing of a conceptual model Abstract Background: Community pharmacists are expanding their roles to include the provision of expanded professional pharmacy services. This role expansion is associated with a new patients´ impression of the pharmacist that could be labelled as “Perceived pharmacist image”. This particular perception of the pharmacist also has led to an increased interest of the pharmacist-patient interaction. Role Theory can be used to explain the interaction between this pair of individuals, by focusing on the roles performed by each one. Objective: To develop and test a model that relates patients´ image of the pharmacist to their expectations of pharmacist’s role, and how this then influences patients´ reactions towards the pharmacist’s role. Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken and a questionnaire was created for the development of the model, based on the Role theory. The content, dimensions, validity and reliability of the questionnaire were pre-tested qualitatively and in a pilot mail survey. The reliability and validity of the proposed model were tested using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was used to explain relationships between dimensions of the final model. Results: A final model was developed. CFA concluded that the model was valid and reliable (Goodness of Fit indices: x²(109) = 227.662, p = 0.000, RMSEA=0.05, SRMR=0.05, GFI=1.00, NNFI=0.90, CFI=0.92). SEM indicated that “Perceived pharmacist image” was associated positively and significantly with both “Professional expectations” (the standardized path coefficient of (H) = 0.719, p<0.05), as well as “Courtesy expectations” (the standardized path coefficient of (H) = 0.582, p<0.05). At the same time, “Professional expectations” were associated positively and significantly with “Positive reactions” (the standardized path coefficient of (H) = 0.358, p<0.05), but negatively with “Negative reactions” (the standardized path coefficient of (H) = -0.427, p<0.05). “Courtesy expectations” were associated positively and significantly with “Positive reactions” (the standardized path coefficient of (H) = 0.081, p<0.05), as well as “Negative reactions” (the standardized path coefficient of (H) = 0.450, p<0.05). Conclusions: A valid and reliable model of the patients´ image of the pharmacist related to their expectations and reactions to the pharmacist´s role was developed and tested. When the perceived image of the pharmacist is enhanced, patients´ expectations of the pharmacist are heightened; in turn, these expectations were associated with reactions of patients. 1.5 Modelling elderly patients´ perception of the community pharmacist image when providing professional services Abstract Professional pharmaceutical services may impact on patient’s health behaviour as well as influence on patients´ perceptions of the pharmacist image. The Health Belief Model predicts health-related behaviours using patients’ beliefs. However, health beliefs could transcend beyond predicting health behaviour and may have an impact on the patients’ perceptions of the pharmacist image. This study objective was to develop and test a model that relates patients’ health beliefs to patient’s perception of the image of the pharmacist, and to assess if the provision of pharmacy services (Intervention group-IG) influences this perception compared to usual care (Control group-CG). A qualitative study was undertaken and a questionnaire was created for the development of the model. The content, dimensions, validity and reliability of the questionnaire were pre-tested qualitatively and in a pilot mail survey. The reliability and validity of the proposed model were tested using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was used to explain relationships between dimensions of the final model and to analyse differences between groups. As a result, a final model was developed. CFA concluded that the model was valid and reliable (Goodness of Fit indices: x²(80) = 125.726, p = 0.001, RMSEA=0.04, SRMR=0.04, GFI=0.997, NFI=0.93, CFI=0.974). SEM indicated that “Perceived benefits” were significantly associated with “Perceived Pharmacist Image” in the whole sample. Differences were found in the IG with also “Self-efficacy” significantly influencing “Perceived pharmacist image”. A model of patients’ health beliefs related to their image of the pharmacist was developed and tested. When pharmacists deliver professional services, these services modify some patients’ health beliefs that in turn influence public perception of the pharmacist. 1.6 Perception of the polymedicated elderly patient about the community pharmacist’s role. [Percepción del paciente mayor polimedicado sobre el rol del farmacéutico comunitario] Abstract Introduction: Currently, almost the 80 percent of the health expenditure in Spain corresponds to people over 65 years old. This population has become polypharmacy as a result of their multiple diseases. Community pharmacists, due to their proximity and accessibility, are one of the health agents who could improve the quality use of medicines and help to control this expense. However, pharmacists are still known by their dispenser role. Materials and methods: An exploratory method was used based on the qualitative research. The Role Theory and Health Belief Model were used as theoretical frameworks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted as a means to get information. Results: Polypharmacy elderly patients tend to associate the role of the healthcare professional with their general practitioner and community nurse, giving less priority to the function of the pharmacist. Patients still identify the role of the pharmacists with the supplying of drugs and healthcare products, i.e., with their dispenser role. However, patients highlight the great accessibility and trust that they have towards these professionals. Conclusion: The polypharmacy elderly patients expect from the pharmacist in Spain a good treatment as well as a dispenser role. This might be due to the low expectations that they have about the pharmacist providing professional pharmacy services. They should extend their current role and also provide professional services in order to modify patients´ perception of the pharmacist.   REFERENCES 1. Wagner DL, Bear M, Davidson NS. Measuring patient satisfaction with postpartum teaching methods used by nurses within the interaction model of client health behavior. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2011;25(3):176-90. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.25.3.176 2. Lonie JM. From counting and pouring to caring: the empathic developmental process of community pharmacists. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;2(4):439-57. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.01.002 3. Pringle J, Melczak M, Aldridge A, Snyder M, Smith R. Medication adherence and its relationship to the therapeutic alliance: results from an innovative pilot study within a community pharmacy MTM practice. Innov Pharm. 2011;2(1-art 33):1-16. 4. Kibicho J, Owczarzak J. A patient-centered pharmacy services model of HIV patient care in community pharmacy settings: a theoretical and empirical framework. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2012;26(1):20-8. doi: 10.1089/apc.2011.0212 5. Butterworth SW. Influencing patient adherence to treatment guidelines. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14(6 Suppl B):21-4. 6. Winsor S, Smith A, Vanstone M, Giacomini M, Brundisini FK, DeJean D. Experiences of patient-centredness with specialized community-based care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013;13(17):1-33. 7. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Patient-Centred Care: Improving Quality and Safety Through Partnerships with Patients and Consumers, ACSQHC, Sydney, 2011 ISBN: 978-0-9870617-1-3. 8. Worley-Louis MM, Schommer JC, Finnegan JR. Construct identification and measure development for investigating pharmacist-patient relationships. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51(3):229-38. 9. Gidman W, Ward P, McGregor L. Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study. BMJ open. 2012;2(3):e000939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000939 10. Twigg MJ, Poland F, Bhattacharya D, Desborough JA, Wright DJ. The current and future roles of community pharmacists: views and experiences of patients with type 2 diabetes. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013;9(6):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.10.004 11. Health Department. Choosing Health through Pharmacy – a Programme for Pharmaceutical Public Health 2005–2015. London: The StationeryOffice2005. 12. Worley MM. Testing a pharmacist-patient relationship quality model among older persons with diabetes. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;2(1):1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.12.006 13. Alghurair SA, Simpson SH, Guirguis LM. What elements of the patient-pharmacist relationship are associated with patient satisfaction? Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:663-76. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s35688 14. Ryan R, Santesso N, Lowe D, Hill S, Grimshaw J, Prictor M, et al. Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:Cd007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3 15. Niquille A, Bugnon O. Relationship between drug-related problems and health outcomes: a cross-sectional study among cardiovascular patients. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32(4):512-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9401-1 16. Kassam R, Collins JB, Berkowitz J. Comparison of patients' expectations and experiences at traditional pharmacies and pharmacies offering enhanced advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(5):pii: 90. 17. Volmer D, Bell JS, Janno R, Raal A, Hamilton DD, Airaksinen MS. Change in public satisfaction with community pharmacy services in Tartu, Estonia, between 1993 and 2005. Research in social & administrative pharmacy: RSAP.2009;5(4):337-46. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2008.12.001 18. Worley MM, Schommer JC, Brown LM, Hadsall RS, Ranelli PL, Stratton TP, et al. Pharmacists' and patients' roles in the pharmacist-patient relationship: are pharmacists and patients reading from the same relationship script? Res Social Adm Pharm. 2007;3(1):47-69. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.03.003 19. Hasan S, Sulieman H, Stewart K, Chapman CB, Hasan MY, Kong DC. Assessing patient satisfaction with community pharmacy in the UAE using a newly-validated tool. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013;9(6):841-50. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.10.002 20. Aslani P, Rose G, Chen TF, Whitehead PA, Krass I. A community pharmacist delivered adherence support service for dyslipidaemia. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(5):567-72. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq118 21. Swaim RA, Barner JC, Brown CM. The relationship of calcium intake and exercise to osteoporosis health beliefs in postmenopausal women. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008;4(2):153-63. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.03.004 22. Austin Z, Gregory PA, Martin JC. Characterizing the professional relationships of community pharmacists. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;2(4):533-46. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.02.007 23. Lawrence LW, Rappaport HM, Feldhaus JB, Bethke AL, Stevens RE. A Study of the Pharmacist-Patient Relationship: Covenant or Contract? J Pharm Mark Manage. 1995;9(3):21-40. 24. Al-Arifi MN. Patients' perception, views and satisfaction with pharmacists' role as health care provider in community pharmacy setting at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J. 2012;20(4):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2012.05.007 25. Hermansen-Kobulnicky CJ, Worley MM. Exploring the patient perspective regarding community pharmacists’ educational roles in diabetes medication and blood glucose management. Int J Pharm Pract. 2008;16(2):81-90. 26. Stewart DC, George J, Bond CM, Cunningham IT, Diack HL, McCaig DJ. Exploring patients' perspectives of pharmacist supplementary prescribing in Scotland. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(6):892-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008-9248-x 27. Tarn DM, Paterniti DA, Wenger NS, Williams BR, Chewning BA. Older patient, physician and pharmacist perspectives about community pharmacists' roles. Int J Pharm Pract. 2012;20(5):285-93. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00202.x 28. Tinelli M, Bond C, Blenkinsopp A, Jaffray M, Watson M, Hannaford P. Patient evaluation of a community pharmacy medications management service. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(12):1962-70. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K242 29. Tinelli M, Ryan M, Bond C. Patients' preferences for an increased pharmacist role in the management of drug therapy. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17(5):275-82. 30. Du Pasquier S, Aslani P. Concordance-based adherence support service delivery: consumer perspectives. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(6):846-53. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008-9237-0 31. Schommer JC, Gaither CA. A segmentation analysis for pharmacists' and patients' views of pharmacists' roles. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10(3):508-28. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.10.004 32. Cavaco AM, Dias JP, Bates IP. Consumers' perceptions of community pharmacy in Portugal: a qualitative exploratory study. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(1):54-60. 33. Anderson C, Blenkinsopp A, Armstrong M. Feedback from community pharmacy users on the contribution of community pharmacy to improving the public's health: a systematic review of the peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed literature 1990-2002. Health Expect. 2004;7(3):191-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00274.x 34. Renberg T, Wichman Tornqvist K, Kalvemark Sporrong S, Kettis Lindblad A, Tully MP. Pharmacy users' expectations of pharmacy encounters: a Q-methodological study. Health Expect. 2011;14(4):361-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00643.x