Cuando el poder ostentado es inmerecidosus efectos sobre la percepción y los juicios sociales

  1. Yzerbyt, Vincent
  2. Rodríguez Bailón, Rosa María
  3. Moya Morales, Miguel C.
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2006

Volumen: 18

Número: 2

Páginas: 194-199

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Betancor, V., Leyens, J.P., Rodríguez, A. y Quiles, M.N. (2003). Atribución diferencial al endogrupo y al exogrupo de las dimensiones de moralidad y eficacia: un índice de favoritismo endogrupal. Psicothema, 15 (3), 70-75.
  • Depret, E. y Fiske, S.T. (1993). Social cognition and power: some cognitive consequences of social structure as a source of control deprivation. En G. Weary, F. Gleicher y D. Marsh (Eds.): Control motivation and social cognition. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Ellemers, N., Wilke, H. y Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (5), 766-778.
  • Fiske, S.T. (1993). Controlling other people - the impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48 (6), 621-628.
  • Fiske, S.T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A.C. y Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55 (3), 473-489.
  • Georgesen, J.C. y Harris, M.J. (1998). Why’s my boss always holding me down: a meta-analysis on performance evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 184-195.
  • Goodwin, S.A., Gubin, S., Fiske, S.T. y Yzerbyt, V. (2000). Power bias impression formation processes: stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes y Intergroup Relations, 3, 227-256.
  • Goodwin, S.A., Operario, D. y Fiske, S.T. (1998). Situational power and interpersonal dominance facilitate bias and inequality. Journal of Social Issues, 54 (4), 677-698.
  • Gough, H.G. (1987). The CPI manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists’ Press.
  • Gurr, T.T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hornsey, M.J., Spears, R., Cremers, I. y Hogg, M.A. (2003). Relations between high and low power groups: the importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (2), 216-227.
  • Jost, J.T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: an experimental paradigm for investigating the effects of socio-economic success on stereotype content. En G. Moskowitz (Ed.): Cognitive social psychology: on the tenure and future of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H. y Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
  • Lee-Chai, A.Y. y Bargh, J.A. (2001). The use and abuse of power. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Major, B. y Schmader, T. (2001). Legitimacy and the construal of social disadvantage. En J.T. Jost y B. Major (Eds.): The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 176-204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Minzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Morera, M.D., Marichal, F.A., Quiles, M.N., Betancor, V., Rodríguez, R., Rodríguez, A., Coello, E.A. y Vargas, I. (2004). La percepción de semejanza intergrupal y la identificación con el endogrupo: ¿incrementa o disminuye el prejuicio? Psicothema, 16, 70-75.
  • Operario, D. y Fiske, S.T. (2001). Effects of trait dominance on powerholders’ judgments of subordinates. Social Cognition, 19 (2), 161-180.
  • Operario, D., Goodwin, S.A. y Fiske, S.T. (1998). Power is everywhere: social control and personal control both operate at stereotype activation, interpretation and response. En T.K. Srull y R.S.J. Wyer (Eds.): Advances in social cognition (vol. XI, pp. 163-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
  • Rodríguez-Bailón, R. y Moya, M. (2002). ¿Cómo perciben a sus superiores aquellos subordinados que experimentan su propia posición como injusta? Efectos de la (I)Legitimidad de la falta de poder sobre la percepción social. Revista de Psicología Social, 17, 35-50.
  • Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Moya, M. y Yzerbyt, V. (2000). Why do superiors attend to negative stereotypic information about their subordinates? Effects of power legitimacy on social perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (5), 651-671.
  • Sidanius, J. y Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: an intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Humans groups and social categories. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wright, S.C. (2001). Restricted intergroup boundaries: tokenism, ambiguity and the tolerance of injustice. En J.T. Jost y B. Major (Eds.): The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 223-256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.