Compensation strategy for human resource managersan agency perspective

Referencias bibliográficas

• ALCHIAN, A.A. y DEMSETZ, M. (1972): “Production, information cost, and economic organization”, American Economic Review, Vol. 62, pp. 777-795.
• AZORÍN ESCOLANO, A. y VARELA GONZÁLEZ, J.A. (1996): “Planes de compensación para la fuerza de ventas: Un contraste empírico de un modelo de teoría de agencia”, Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, Vol. 5, N. 2, pp. 137-148.
• BASU, A.K.; LAL, R.; SRINIVASAN, V. y STAELIN, R. (1985). “Salesforce compensation plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective”, Marketing Science, Vol. 4, N. 4, pp. 267-291.
• BAUMOL, M.J. (1958): “On the theory of oligopoly”, Economica, Vol. 25, pp. 56-59.
• CAMERON, K.; KIM, M . Y. y WHETTON, D.A. (1987): “Organizational effects of decline and turbulence”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, pp. 222-240.
• DEARSEN, J.A. y LILIEN, G.L. (1990): “On optimal salesforce compensation in the presence of production learning effects”, International Journal Research Marketing, Vol. 7, N. 2-3, pp. 179-188.
• DECKOP, J.R. y MAHONEY, T.M. (1982): “The economics of executive compensation”, en la 42 edition Annual National Academy of Management Proceedings, New York.
• EISENHARDT, K.M. (1988): “Agency and institutional theory explanations: The case of retail sales”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, 488-511.
• EISENHARDT, K.M. (1989): “Agency Theory: An assessment and review”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 57-74.
• FAMA, E. (1980): “Agency problems and the theory of the firm”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, pp. 288-307.
• FAMA, E. (1994): “Problemas de agencia y teoría de la empresa”, en L. Putterm a n (ed.): La naturaleza económica de la empresa, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
• GALVE GÓRRIZ, C. y SALAS FUMAS, V. (1994): “Propiedad y resultados de la empresa: una revisión de la literatura teórica y empírica”, Economía Industrial, Vol. 300, pp. 171-195.
• JENSEN, M. y MECKLING, W. (1979): “Rights and production functions: an application to labor managed firms and codetermination”, Journal of Business, Vol. 52, pp. 469-506.
• JENSEN, M.C. y MECKLING, W.H. (1976): “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305-360.
• LAL, R. y SRINIVASAN, V. (1988): “Salesforce compensation plans: A dynamic perspective”, Working Paper, Research Papel N. 999. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
• LAL, R. y SRINIVASAN, V. (1996): “Compensation plans for singleand multi-product salesforces: An application of Holmström-Milgrom Model”, Marnagement Science, Vol. 39, N. 7, pp. 777-793.
• LAL, R. y STAELIN, R. (1986): “Salesforce compensation plans in environments with asymetric information”, Marketing Science, Vol. 5, N. 3, pp. 179-198.
• LAWRIWSKY, M.L. (1984): Corporate structure and performance: The role of owners, managers and markets, Londres, Croom Helm.
• LEWELLEN, W.; LODERER, C. y ROSENFELD, A. (1989): “Mergers, executive risk reduction, and stockholder wealth”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 24, pp. 459-472.
• LEWELLEN, W.G. y HUNTSMAN, B. (1970): “Managerial pay and corporate performance”, American Economic Review, Vol. 60, pp. 710-720.
• MASON, E.S. (1939): “Price and production policies of large-scale enterprises”, American Economic Review, Vol. 29, pp. 61-67.
• MURPHY, K. (1985): “Corporate performance and managerial remuneration”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 7, pp. 11-42.
• PALACÍN SÁNCHEZ, M.J. (1996): Fusiones de empresas: el mercado español de control corporativo en los noventa, Sevilla, Tesis doctoral no publicada.
• PUTTERMAN, L. (1994): La naturaleza económica de la empresa, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
• SIMON, H.A. (1957): “The compensation of executives”, Sociometry, Vol. 20, pp. 32-35.