Dimensiones de la apreciación del humor

  1. Buela Casal, Gualberto
  2. Pérez Meléndez, Cristino
  3. Carretero Dios, Hugo
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2006

Volumen: 18

Número: 3

Páginas: 465-470

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AERA, APA y NCME (1999). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, National Council on Measurement in Education.
  • Armstrong, T.S., Cohen, M.Z., Eriksen, L. y Cleeland, C. (2005). Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: an illustration from the development of the Brain Tumor Module of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32, 669-676.
  • Attardo, S., Hempelmann, C.F. y Di Maio, S. (2002). Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: modeling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 3-46.
  • Billing, M. (2002). Freud and the language of humour. The Psychologist, 15, 452-455.
  • Bremmer, J. y Roodenburg, H. (1999). Una historial cultural del humor: desde la antigüedad hasta nuestros días. Madrid: Sequitur.
  • Cameron, K. (1993). Humour and History. Oxford: Intellect.
  • Carballo, J.L., García, O., Secades, R., Fernández-Hermida, J.R., García-Cueto, E., Erraste, J.M. y Al-Halabi, S. (2004). Construcción y validación de un cuestionario de factores de riesgo interpersonales para el consumo de drogas en la adolescencia. Psicothema, 16, 674-679.
  • Carretero-Dios, H. y Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. Internacional Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5, 521-551.
  • Derks, P., Staley, R.E. y Haselton, M.G. (1998). Sense of humor: perception, intelligence or expertise? En W. Ruch (ed.): The sense of humor: explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 143-158). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Forabosco, G. (1992). Cognitive aspects of the humor process: the concept of incongruity. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 5, 45-68.
  • Ford, T.E. y Ferguson, M.A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: a prejudiced norm theory. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8, 79-94.
  • Freud, S. (1994). El chiste y su relación con lo inconsciente. Madrid: Alianza (orig. 1905).
  • Fry, W.F. (2002). Humor and the brain: a selective review. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 305-333.
  • Gruner, C.R. (1997). The game of humor: a comprehensive theory of why we laugh. New Brunswick, Nueva York: Transaction.
  • Haladyma, T. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hambleton, R.K. (2004). Theory, methods and practices in testing for the 21st century. Psicothema, 16, 696-701.
  • Harris, C. y Christenfeld, N. (1997). Humour, tickle and the Darwin-Hecker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 103-110.
  • Henson, R. y Douglas, J. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.
  • Herzog, T.H. (1999). Gender differences in humor appreciation revised. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 12, 411-423.
  • Johnson, A.M. (1992). Language ability and sex affect humor appreciation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 571-581.
  • Joubert, L. (2002). Tratado de la risa. Madrid: Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría (orig, 1579).
  • Lampert, M. y Ervin-Tripp, S. (1998). Exploring paradigms: the study of gender and sense of humor near the end of the 20th century. En W. Ruch (ed.): The sense of humor: explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 231-270). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Lefcourt, H.M. y Shepherd, R.S. (1995). Organ donation, authoritarianism and perspective-taking humor. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 121-138.
  • Lord, F.M. y Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Lowis, M.J. y Nieuwoudt, J.M. (1995). The use of a cartoon rating scale as a measure for the humor construct. Journal of Psychology, 129, 133-144.
  • Martin, R.A. (1998). Approaches to the sense of humor: a historical review. En W. Ruch (ed.): The sense of humor: explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 15-62). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Martin, R.A. (2000). Humor and Laughter. En A.E. Kazdin (ed.): Encyclopedia of Psychology, vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Maxwell, W. (2003). The use of gallows humor and dark humor during crisis situation. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 5, 93-98.
  • Moreno, R., Martínez, R. y Muñiz, J. (2004). Directrices para la construcción de ítems de elección múltiple. Psicothema, 16, 490-497
  • Muñiz, J. (2004). La validación de los tests. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5, 121-141.
  • Muñiz, J. (2005). La validez desde una óptica psicométrica. Acta Comportamentalia, 13, 9-20.
  • Osterlind, S.J. (1989). Constructing Test Items. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Pelechano, V. (2000). Psicología sistemática de la personalidad. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Pelechano, V. y Servando, M.A. (2004). ¿Qué es la personalidad? Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
  • Perlmutter, D.D. (2000). Tracing the origin of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 13, 457-468.
  • Roeckelein, J. (2002). The Psychology of Humor: a reference guide and annotated bibliography. London: Greenwood Press.
  • Ruch, W. (1992). Assessment of appreciation of humor: Studies with the 3 WD humor test. En C.D. Spielberger y J.M. Butcher (eds.): Advances in personality assessment (pp. 27-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ruch, W. (1995). Humor-Test 3 WD. Documento no publicado. Universidad de Dusseldorf: Alemania.
  • Ruch, W. (1996). Measurement approaches to the sense of humor: introduction and overview. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9, 239-250.
  • Ruch, W. (1998). Sense of humor: a new look at an old concept. En W. Ruch (ed.): The sense of humor: explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 3-14). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Ruch, W. y Hehl, F.J. (1983). Intolerance of ambiguity as a factor in the appreciation of humour. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 443-449.
  • Ruch, W. y Hehl, F.J. (1998). A two-model of humor appreciation: its relation to aesthetic appreciation and simplicity-complexity of personality. En W. Ruch (ed.): The sense of humor: explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 109-142). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Soler, E., Barreto, P. y González, R. (2005). Cuestionario de respuesta emocional a la violencia doméstica y sexual. Psicothema, 17, 267-274.
  • Svebak, S. (1974). A theory of sense of humor. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 99-107.
  • Vogt, D.S., King, D.W. y King, L.A. (2004). Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhacing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychological Assessment, 16, 231-243.
  • Walsh, W.B. (2001). Tests and assessment. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wycoff, E.B. y Prior, B. (2003). Cognitive processing, creativity, apprehension and the humorous personality. North American Journal of Psychology, 5, 31-44.