Google Scholar¿una herramienta para la evaluación de la ciencia?

Bibliographic References

• Bauer, Kathleen; Bakkalbasi, Nisa. “An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment”. D-Lib magazine, 2005, v. 11, n. 9.
• Friend, Frederick J. “G-S: Potentially good for users of academic information”. Journal of electronic publishing, 2006, v. 9, n. 1.
• Harzing, Anne-Wil; Van Der Wal, Ron. “G-S as a new source for citation analysis”. Ethics in science and environmental politics, 2008, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 61-73.
• Jacsó, Peter. “G-S revisited”. Online information review, 2008a, v. 32, n. 1, pp. 102-114.
• Jacsó, Peter. “The pros and cons of computing the hindex using G-S”. Online information review, 2008b, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 437-452.
• Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike. “G-S citations and Google web/url citations: a multi-discipline exploratory analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, v. 58, n. 7. pp. 1055-1065.
• Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike. “Sources of G-S citations outside the Science Citation Index: a comparison between four science disciplines”. Scientometrics, 2008, v. 74, n. 2, pp. 273-294.
• Meho, Lokman, I.; Yang, Kiduk. “Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: WoS vs Scopus and G-S”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, v. 58, n. 13, pp. 2105-2125.
• Noruzi, Alireza. “G-S: the new generation of citation indexes”. Libri, 2005, v. 55, n. 4, pp. 170-180.
• Neuhaus, Chris; Neuhaus, Ellen; Asher, Alan; Wrede, Clint. “The depht and breadth of G-S: an empirical study”. Libraries and the academy, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 127-141.