La divulgación de información sobre responsabilidad corporativa en administraciones públicasun estudio empírico en gobiernos locales

  1. Navarro Galera, Andrés
  2. Alcaraz Quiles, Francisco José
  3. Ortiz, David
Revista:
Revista de contabilidad = Spanish accounting review: [RC-SAR]

ISSN: 1138-4891

Año de publicación: 2010

Volumen: 13

Número: 2

Páginas: 285-314

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/S1138-4891(10)70019-4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de contabilidad = Spanish accounting review: [RC-SAR]

Información de financiación

En cuanto al análisis de factores asociados, no hemos encontrado evidencia para soportar que el desarrollo de las prácticas de publicación de información RSC pueda ser favorecido por el tamaño de la entidad, el volumen de gasto, el nivel de competencia política y el signo político del partido gobernante.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aranguren, N. y Ochoa, E. (2008). Divulgaciön de informaciön sobre empleados y medio ambiente en España y Alemania: una nota de investigaciön, Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 11(2), 123-142.
  • Archel, P. (2003). La divulgaciön de la informaciön social y medioambiental en la gran empresa española en el período 1994-1998: Situaciön actual y perspectivas, Revista Española de Financiaciön y Contabilidad, XXXII (117), 571-601.
  • Archel, P. y Lizarraga, F. (2001). Algunos determinantes de la informaciön medioambiental divulgada por las empresas españolas cotizadas, Revista de Contabilidad, 4(7), 129-153.
  • Asociaciön Española de Contabilidad y Administraciön de Empresas (AECA) (2004). Marco conceptual de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa, AECA, Madrid.
  • Audit Commission for Local Authorities and National Health Service in England and Wales (2007). Corporate Governance inspection: key lines of enquiry, www.audit-commission.gov.uk
  • Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1990). Statement of Accounting no.2, Objective of general purpose financial reporting, Caulfield: AARF.
  • Ball, A. (2004). A Sustainability Accounting Project for the UK Local Government Sector? Testing the Social Theory Mapping Process and Locating a Frame of Reference. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(8), 1009-1035.
  • Ball, A. (2005). Environmental accounting and change in UK local government. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 18(3), 346-373.
  • Ball, A. y Bebbington, J. (2008). Editorial: Accounting and Reporting for Sustainable Development in Public Service Organizations. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 323-326.
  • Ball, A., Broadbent, J. y Jarvis, T. (2006). Waste management, the challenges of the PFI and sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(4), 258-274.
  • Ball, A. y Grubnic, S. (2007). Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector. En Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O'Dwyer, B. (Eds) Sustainability Accounting and Accontability, Routledge, London.
  • Banerjee, S.B. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Bastida, F. y Benito, B. (2007). Central government budget practices and transparency: an international comparison. Public Administration, 85(3), 667-716.
  • Bebbington, J., Larrinaga-González, C. y Moneva, J. (2008). Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3), 337-361.
  • Benito B. y Bastida, F. (2008). Política y Gestiön Financiera Municipal, Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 11(2), 43-66.
  • Bernhart, M. (2009). The rules of The Game. Communication World, 26(5), 25-28.
  • Bowerman, M. y Hutchinson, F. (1998). The role of local authority accountants in environmental decision-making. Financial Accountability and Management, 14(4), 229-317.
  • Breitbarth, T., Harris, P. y Aitken, R. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the European Union: a new trade barrier?. Journal of Public Affairs, 9(4), 239-255.
  • Brusca Alijarde, I. (1997), Un modelo de informaciön contable para el análisis de la viabilidad financiera en la administraciön local. Ed. Ayuntamiento de Zaragoza.
  • Burrit, R.L. y Welch, S. (1997). Annual reports of AustralianCommonwealth authorities: an analysis of their environmental disclosures. Abacus, 33(1), 69-87.
  • Cameron, W. (2004). Public accountability: Effectiveness, equity, ethics. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(4), 59-67.
  • Campbell, T. (2007). The Normative Grounding of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Human Rights Approach. En McBarnet, D.J., Voiculescu, A. and Campbell, T. (Eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
  • Casado Robledo, S. (1999). La Contabilidad de las Administraciones Públicas. Ed. Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas.
  • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) (1990). Public Sector Accounting. Local Government Financial Statements, Toronto, Statement No. 6, Objectives and General Principles. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
  • Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) (2006). Sustainability: A Reporting Framework for the Public Services. London: CIPFA.
  • Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) (2007), Delivering good governance in local government. London: CIPFA.
  • Chen, S. y Bouvain, P. (2009). Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 299-317.
  • Condit, J. y Fagan, B.D. (2001). Citizens' Access to On-line State Legislative Documents. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 105-121.
  • Crane, A. y Matten, D. (2007), Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Crane, A., Matten, D. y Spence, L.J. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility. Readings and cases in a Global Context. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Crognale, G. (2008). The Global Reporting Initiative G3 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (Part 1). Business and the Environment, 19(12), 12-14.
  • Crognale, G. (2009a). The Global Reporting Initiative G3 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (Part 2). Business and the Environment, 20(1), 10-12.
  • Crognale, G. (2009b). The Global Reporting Initiative G3 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (Conclusion). Business and the Environment, 20(2). 11-14.
  • Cueto Cedillo, C. (2009). La aplicaciön de modelos de transparencia y responsabilidad por las Corporaciones Locales y su potencial efecto multiplicador sobre el desarrollo sostenible global. Boletín AECA, junio: 10-14.
  • Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-A theoretical foundation?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (3), 282-311.
  • Dutta, S.K. y Lawson, R.A. (2009). Aligning Performance Evaluation and Reward Systems with Corporate Sustainability Goals. Cost Management, 23(6), 15-23.
  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
  • Erdmenger, C. (1998). From business to municipality-and back. Local Environment, 3(3), 371-379.
  • Escobar, B. y González, J.M. (2006). Resposabilidad social corporativa: ¿compromiso u oportunismo?, Revista de Contabilidad, 8, 67-98.
  • Ettredge, M., Richardson, J.V. y Scholz, S. (2001). The presentation of financial information at Corporate Web Sites. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2(3), 149-168.
  • Fox, T., Ward, H. y Howard, B (2002). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: a baseline study. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
  • Frost, G. (2007). The introduction of mandatory environmental reportingguidelines: Australian Evidence. Abacus, 43(2), 190-216.
  • Fundaciön La Caixa (2008), Anuario Social de España, Barcelona: Colecciön Estudios Sociales, Fundaciön La Caixa.
  • Garriga, E. y Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics. 53(1/2), 51-71.
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2000). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental and Social Performance. Boston: Global Reporting Initiative.
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2002). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Boston: Global Reporting Initiative.
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2005). Sector Supplement for Public Agencies, Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2006). G3 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
  • Godfrey, P. C. y Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87-98.
  • Gore, A. (2006). An Inconvenient Truth. London: Rodale Book.
  • Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) (1987). Objectives of Financial Reporting. USA: Norwalk. Concepts Statements no 11, www.gasb.org
  • Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) (1999). Concepts Statement on SEA Reporting Performance Measurement Information Clearinghouse for Governments, www.gasb.org
  • Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organizational value creation: whose value? Whose creation?. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793-819.
  • Guthrie, J. y Farneti, F. (2008). GRI Sustainability Reporting by Australian Public Sector Organizations. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 361-366.
  • Huang, C.J., y Chao, M.H. (2001). Managing WWW in Public Administration: Uses and Misutes. Government Information Quarterly, 18(4), 357-373.
  • Husillos, J. y Álvarez-Gil, M.J. (2008). Una aproximaciön desde la Teoría de los Stakeholder a la divulgaciön de informaciön medioambiental de las pequeñas y medianas empresas (PYMEs), Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 11(1), 125-156.
  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001). Governance in the Public Sector: A governing body perspective. New York: IFAC.
  • Intervenciön General de la Administraciön del Estado (IGAE) (1995). Manual de Contabilidad Pública, Ed. Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda.
  • Intervenciön General de la Administraciön del Estado (IGAE) (2007). Indicadores en el ámbito del Sector Público, Ed. IGAE.
  • Lamprinidi, S. y Kubo, N. (2008). Debate: The Global Reporting Initiative and Public Agencies. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 326-329.
  • Larrán, M. y Lopez, A. (2009). ¿Son las Universidades Públicas Andaluzas Socialmente. Responsables?. ¿Por qué?. Workshop en Responsabilidad Social, Gobierno Corporativo y Transparencia Informativa. Granada 2-3 Julio.
  • Larrinaga-González, C. y Pérez-Chamorro, V. (2008). Sustainability Accounting and Accountability in Public Water Companies. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 337-343.
  • Lewis, T. (2008). Public Sector Sustainability Reporting-Implication for Accountants. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 329-331.
  • Mar, M. C. y Serrano, C. (2001). Bank failure: a multidimensional scaling approach. European Journal of Finance, 7(2), 165-183.
  • Marcuccio, M. y Steccolini, I. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in local authorities. Public Management Review, 7(2), 155-176.
  • Meijer, A.J. (2007). Publishing public performance results on the Internet. Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold Dutch public service organizations to account?. Government Information Quarterly, 24(1), 165-185.
  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. y Wright, P. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
  • Milne, M.J. y Gray, R. (2007). Future prospects for corporate sustainability reporting. En Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. y O'Dwyer, B. (Eds), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. London: Routledge.
  • Moon, J. (2004). Government as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility. Research Paper, International Center for Corporate Social Responsibility, Nottingham, 20-2004.
  • Murillo, D. y Lozano, J.M. (2009). Pushing forward SME RSC through a network: an account from the Catalan model. Business Ethics: An European Review, 18(1), 7-20.
  • Navarro Galera, A. (2005). A proposal for the application of the international standards' valuation model to the Spanish public entities assets. Revista Española de Financiaciön y Contabilidad, XXXIV(126), julio-septiembre, 637-661.
  • Navarro Galera, A., Ortiz Rodríguez, D. y Löpez Hernández, A. (2008). Identifying barriers to the application of standardized performance indicators in local government. Public Management Review, 10(2), 241-262.
  • Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary?. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613-627.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002). OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency. OECD Journal on Budgeting. Paris: OECD.
  • Ortiz, D., Navarro, A. y Löpez, A. (2006). Consensus among public managers as strategy for standardization of performance indicators. International Public Management Journal, 9(4), 371-398.
  • Palazzo, G.S. y Scherer, A.G. (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71-88.
  • Palazzo, G.S. y Scherer, A.G. (2007). Towards a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096-1120.
  • Pardo Merino, A. y Ruiz Diaz, M. A. (2005). Análisis de Datos con SSPS 13 Base. Aravaca: MCGraw-Hill.
  • Pérez, C. (2001). Técnicas estadísticas con SSPS. Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Perrini, F., Pogutz, S. y Tencati, A. (2006), Developing Corporate Social Responsibility-A European Perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Pina, V., Torres, L., y Acerete,B. (2007). Are ICTs promoting government accountability?: A comparative analysis of e-governance developments in 19 OECD countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18(5), 583-602.
  • Pina, V., Torres, L. y Marti, C. (2009). Accrual Accounting in EU local governments: one method, several approaches. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 765-807.
  • Piotrowski, S.J. y Van Ryzin, G.G. (2007). Citizen Attitudes towards transparency in Local Government. American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306-323.
  • Rodríguez Bolivar, M.P., Caba Pérez, M.C. y Löpez Hernández, A.M. (2006). Cultural contexts and governmental digital reporting. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 269-290.
  • Rodríguez Bolivar, M.P., Caba Pérez, M.C. y Löpez Hernández, A.M. (2007). E-Government and public financial reporting: the case of Spanish regional governments. American Review of Public Administration, 37(2), 142-177.
  • Royo, S. (2008). El gobierno electrönico en la rendiciön de cuentas de la Administraciön local. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
  • Spence, L. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(9), 163-172.
  • Stern, N. (2006). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P. y Collin, S. (2009). What Explains the Extent and Content of Social and Environmental Disclosures on Corporate Websites: A Study of Social and Environmental Reporting in Swedish Listed Corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 352-364.
  • Zafra Gömez, J.L., Löpez Hernández, A. M. y Hernández Bastida, A. (2008). Developing a model to measure financial condition in Local Governments. American Review of Public Administration, 39(4), 425-449.
  • Zafra Gömez, J.L., Löpez Hernández, A. M. y Hernández Bastida, A. (2009). Developing an alert system for local governments in financial crisis. Public Money & Management, 29(3), 175-181.