Estudio de validación de la Escala para la Evaluación del Proceso de Enseñanza-Aprendizajeversión del estudiantes (EEPEA-E)

Referencias bibliográficas

• Arbuckle, J.L., (2008). AMOS 16.0. Chicago: SPSS Corporation.
• Apodaca, P. & Grad, H. (2005). The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching: integration of uni and multidimensional models. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 723-748.
• Berbén, A.B.G. (2005). A study of approaches to learning in students of Educational and School Psychology. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 6, 3(2), 109-126.
• Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
• Bentler, P. M., & Dijkstra, T. (2000). Efficient estimation via linearization in structural models. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate Analysis VI (9-42). Amsterdam: North-Holland
• Bigg, J. (2001). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Biggs, J., Kember, D. & Leung, D. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: RSPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
• Butler, R. & Shibaz, L. (2009). Achievement goals for teaching as predictor of students' perception of instructional practices and students' help seeking and cheating. Learning & Instruction, 18(59), 453-467.
• Byrne, B. (2001). Structural Equation Modelling in AMOS; Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Cardelle-Elawar, M.C., Irving, L., & Sanz de Acedo, M.L. (2007). A cross cultural analysis of Motivational Factors that Influence the Professional Identity. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 565-592.
• Coll, C., Rochera, M.J., Mayordomo, R.M., & Naranjo, M. (2007). Continuous assessment and support for learning. An experience in educational innovation with ICT support in higher education. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 783-804.
• Chen, F., Curran, P.J., Bollen, K.A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462-494.
• De la Fuente, J. & Cardelle-Elawar, M.C. (2009). Research on actionemotion style and study habits: Effects of individual differences on learning and academic performance of undergraduate students. Learning & Individual Differences, 19 (5), 567-576.
• De la Fuente, J. & Eissa, M.A. (2010). International Handbook on Applying Self-Regulated Learning in Different Settings. Almería (Spain): Education & Psychology I+D+i, e-Publishing Series.
• De la Fuente, J. & Justicia, F. (2001). Escala para la Evaluación del Proceso de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje, EEPEA. [Scale for the Assessment of the Teaching-Learning Process, ATLP.] Almería (spain): University Publications Service.
• De la Fuente, J. & Justicia, F. (2007). The DEDEPRO Model for Regulating Teaching and Learning: recent advances. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 535-564.
• De la Fuente, J. & Justicia, F. (2010). Assessment of the Teaching-Learning Process (ATLP). Almería (Spain): Education & Psychology I+D+i, e-Publishing Series. In press.
• De la Fuente, J., Justicia, F. & Berbén, A.B.G. (2005). Enfoques de aprendizaje, percepción del proceso de enseñanza/aprendizaje y rendimiento de universitarios. [Learning approaches, perception of the teaching/learning process and performance of university students.] Revista de Psicología y Educación, 1(2), 87-102.
• De la Fuente, J., Justicia, F., & Berbén, A.B.G. (2006). An Interactive Model of Regulated Teaching and Selfregulated Learning. International Journal of Learning, 12(7), 217-225.
• De la Fuente, J. & Martínez, J. M. (2007). Scale for Interactive Assessment of the Teaching-Learning Process, IATLP. Almería (Spain): Education & Psychology I+D+i, e-Publishing Series.
• Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students' conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35, 299-316.
• Emanuel, R. & Adams, J. N. (2006). Assessing college student perceptions of instructor customer service via the quality of instructor service to students (QISS) questionnaire. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), 535-549.
• Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual basis of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325-345.
• Entwistle, N.J. & Peterson, E.R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behavior and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 407-428.
• Entwistle, N. & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169-194.
• Ginns, P., Prosser, M., & Barrie, S. (2007). Students' perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: the perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 603-615.
• Harris, J.M., Wickline, V.B., & Iliescu, C.S. (2004). Construct Validation of Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) with an American College Sample. Poster presented at the 16th Annual Convention, May, Chicago (Illinois). Accessed on June 10, 2004 at: http://www.psychologicalscience.org/convention/program/search/results.cf m?Author=40 18
• Harvey, L. & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.
• Hounsell, D., Entwistle, N., et al. (2001-2003). ETL project. Enhancing Teaching-Leaning Environments in Undergraduate Courses. The School of Education, University of Edinburgh.
• Hugener, I., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2009). Teaching patterns and learning quality of Swiss and German mathematics lesson. Learning & Instruction, 19(1), 66-78.
• Husbands, C. T & Fosh, P. (1993). Students' evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: experiences from European countries and some implications for practice (1). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(2), 95-114.
• Jarvinen, A. & Kohonen, V. (1995). Promoting Professional Development in Higher Education through Portfolio Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(1), 25-36.
• Justicia, F., Pichardo, M. C. Cano, C., Berbén, A.B.G. & De la Fuente, J. (2008). The revised TwoFactor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses at Item Level. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(3), 355-372.
• Kelvin, A. (1993). Increasing students' participation in the learning process. Higher Education, 26, 449-469.
• Kember, D. & Wong, A. (2000). Implications for evaluation from a study of students' perceptions of good and poor teaching. Higher Education, 40(1), 69-97.
• Kember, D., Jenkins, W. & Chi, K. (2004). Adult students' perceptions of good teaching as a function of their conceptions of learning-Part 2. Implications for the evaluation of teaching. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 81-97.
• Kinchin, I.M., Lygo-Baker, S., & Hay, D.B. (2008). Universities as centres of nonlearning. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 89-103.
• Klassen, R.M. (2004). Optimism and realism: a review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 205-230.
• Leung, M. & Chan, K. (2001).Construct Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Revised Two-factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) in the Hong Kong Context. Paper presented at the AARE 2001 Conference, December, Perth (Australia).
• Oyserman, D., Coon H., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.
• Phan, H.P. (2008). Multiple regression analysis of epistemological beliefs, learning approaches, and self-regulated learning. Electronic Journal Research in Education Psychology, 14, 6(1), 157-184.
• Pilcher, R. (2002). Analysis of the Approaches to Learning by Accounting and Business Students in Australia-Evaluating the Classroom. Poster presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Accounting Association, August, Honolulu, (Hawaii). Accessed on October 8th, 2003, at: http://aaahq.org/AM2003/ StrategicLearning01/05.htm
• Postareff, L. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers' description of teaching: broadening the understanding of teaching higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109-120.
• Pratt, D.D. (1997). Reconceptualizing the evaluation of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 34, 23-44.
• Print, M. & Hattie, J. (1997). Measuring quality in universities: An approach to weighting research productivity. Higher Education, 33, 453-469.
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd. Ed.) New York: Roudlege Falmer.
• Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453-472.
• Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of The Approach to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 409-424.
• Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75-84.
• Tweed, R.G. & Lehman, D.R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89-99.
• Vermunt, J.D. & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257-280.
• Weinstein, C.D. & Mayer, R.E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.Wittrock, Handbook of Research of Teaching (pp. 257-274). New York: MacMillan.
• Wehmeyer, M.L., Abery, B., Mithaug, D.E., & Stancliffe, R.J. (2003). Theory in Self-Determination: Foundations for Educational Practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher, LTD.
• Wehmeyer, M.L., Agran, M., Hughes, C., Martin, J.E., Mithaug, D.E., & Palmer, S.B. (2007). Promoting self-determination in students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
• Zohar, A. & Bracha, P. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low-and high-achieving students. Learning & Instruction, 18(2), 337-352.