Observatorios territoriales y urbanos en Europa ¿entidades pasivas o instrumentos operativos para la planificación?

Referencias bibliográficas

• ALEXANDER, E. (2000): «Rationality revisited: Planning para digms in a post-postmodernist perspective». Journal of Planning Education and Research 19, 3: 242-256.
• ALFASI, N & J. PORTUGALI (2004): «Planning Just-intime versus planning Just-in-Case». Cities. 21: 29-39.
• BARREDO, J. I. & M. KASANKO & N. MCCORMICK & C. LAVALLE (2003): «Modelling dynamic spatial processes simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata». Landscape and Urban Planning, 64: 145-160.
• BOCK, S. (2003): «City 2030. 21 cities in quest of the future: New forms of urban and regional governance». European Planning Studies, 14, 3: 322- 334.
• BORJERSON, L. & M. HOJER & K.H. DREBORG & T. EKVALL & G. FINNVENDEN (2006): «Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user´s guide». Futures, 38, 723-739.
• CEC (Commission of The European Communities) (1991a): Europe 2000: outlook for the development of the of the community’s territory, Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (1991b): Sustainable Cities Project, Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (1992): V Programa de acción comunitaria por el medio ambiente, Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (1994): Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European territorial developments, Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (1997): Tratado Constitutivo de Amsterdam, Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (1999): European Spatial development perspective: towards a balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the Europa Union. Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (2001): Second report on economic and social cohesion, Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (2003a): Structural policies and European territories: competitiveness, sustainable development and cohesion Europe, Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (2003b): A new partnership for cohesion: Consequence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third report on economic and social cohesion, Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburgo.
• CEC (2007): Territorial State and Perspective of the Union: Agenda 2007, Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
• CEC (2008): Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength, DG Regional Policy, Brussels.
• CEC (2009): Sixth Progress Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Creative and Innovative regions. Offi ce for the Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• CEC (1990): El libro verde sobre medio ambiente urbano. Bruselas.
• CEMAT (Conferencia Europea de Ministros Responsables de la Ordenación del Territorio) (1983): Carta Europea de Ordenación del Territorio. Torremolinos, España.
• CEMAT (2000): Principios directores para el desarrollo territorial sostenible del continente europeo. Hannover, Alemania.
• CULLINGWORTH, B. & V. NADIN (2006): Town and country planning in the UK». Fourteenth edition (42th edition). Routledge, London.
• CULTUPLAN (2006): Planning Cultures in Europe – Exploring Cultural Differences as Resources and Restrictions for Interregional Cooperation 28th – 29th of June 2007 in Hamburg. www. cultplan. org.
• DAVOUDI, S. (2003): «Polycentricity in European Spatial Planning: From an Analytical Tool to a Normative Agenda». European Planning Studies. 11, 8: 980-999.
• DAVOUDI, S. (2005): «Understanding territorial cohesion». Planning, Practice & Research, 20, 4: 433-441.
• DAVOUDI, S. & I. Strange (eds.) (2009): Concepcions of space and place in strategic spatial planning. Routledge, London and New York.
• DE JONG, M & J. EDELENBOS (2007): «An insider’s look into policy transfer in transnational transfer network». European Planning Studies. 15, 5: 687- 706.
• DOUCET, P. (2006): «Territorial cohesion of tomorrow: A path to cooperation or competition?» European Planning Studies, 14, 1473–1485.
• DÜHR, S. (2007): The Visual Language of Spatial Planning. Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning in Europe. Routledge, London.
• DÜHR, S. & D. STEAD & W. ZONNENVELD (2007): «The Europeanization of Spatial Plnning through Territorial Cooperation». Planning, Practise & Research, 22, 30: 290-307.
• EEA (European Environment Agency) (2006a): Urban Sprawl in Europe. EEA Report, n.o 10/2006.
• EEA (2006b): Land Accounts for Europe. Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting. EEA Report, n.o 11/2006.
• FALUDI, A. (2003): «Unifi nished business: European sapatual planning in the 2000». Town Planning Review, 78, 1: 121-140.
• FALUDI, A. (2005): «Territorial cohesion: An unidentifi ed political objective», Town Planning Review, 76, 1-13.
• FALUDI, A. (2006a): «Evaluating plans: The application of the European spatial development perspective». en Ernest R. Alexander (ed.) Evaluation in planning: Evolution and prospects,: 119-43. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
• FALUDI, A. (2006b): «From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy». Regional Studies, 40: 667–678.
• FALUDI, A. (Ed.) (2007): Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
• FARINOS, J. & J. ROMERO (2007): «El gobierno del desarrollo territorial sostenible. A modo de presentación» en Joaquín Farinós i Dasí, Joan Romero González (coords.) Territorialidad y buen gobierno para el desarrollo sostenible: nuevos principios y nuevas políticas en el espacio europeo:11-18.
• FONT, A. (2004): «Un nuevo planeamiento para una nueva territorialidad». Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 141-142: 561-568.
• GEERTMAN, S. & J. STILLWELL (2004): «Planning support system: an inventory of current practice». Computers. Environment and Urban System. 28: 291-310.
• GESTEL, T. & A. FALUDI (2005): «Towards a European territorial cohesion assessment network. A bright future for ESPON?» Town Planning Review. 76, 1: 81-92.
• HEALEY, P. (1996): «The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy foundation». Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 23, 2: 217-34.
• HEALEY, P. (2010): Making better places. The planningproject in the Twenty-fi rst Century. Macmillan.
• HENDRIKS, P & D. VRIENS (2000): «From Geographical Information Systems to Spatial Group Decision Support Systems: a Complex Itinerary». Geographical & Environmental Modellin, 4: 83-104.
• HERRSCHEL, T. & P. NEWMAN (2002): Governance of Europe’s city regions: Planning, policy and politics. Routledge, London.
• HILDENBRAND, A. (1996): Política de ordenación del territorio en Europa. Editorial Universidad de Sevilla.
• KEINER, M. & K. ARLEY (2007): «Transnational city networks for sustainability». European Planning Studies, 15, 10: 1368-1395.
• KEIL, A. (2006). «New urban governance processes on the level of neighbourhoods». European Planning Studies, 15, 10: 336-364.
• LICHFIELD, N. (2001): «The philosophy and role of community impact evaluation in the planning system». En Recent develop ments in evaluation, ed. Henk Voogd:, 153-73. Geopress. Groningen, Neth erlands.
• MORPHET, J. (ed.) (2010): Effective practice in Spatial Planning. Routledge, London and New York.
• NEUMAN, M. (2006): «La gobernanza regional metropolitana. Grandes redes institucionales y fenómenos de multiescala». Urban, 11: 6-23.
• NEWMAN, P. & A. THORNELEY (1996): Urban Planning in Europe. Routledge, London and New York.
• OLIVEIRA, V. & P. PINHO (2010): «Evaluation in Urban Planning: Advances and Prospects» Journal of Planning Literature. May 24(4): 343-361.
• PETTIT, C. & D. PULLAR (1999): «An integrated planning tool based upon multiple criteria evaluation of spatial information». Computers, Environment and Urban System, 23: 339-357.
• PORTAS, N. (2003): «Ciudad contemporánea y gobernabilidad». En Antonio FONT (coord.), Planeamiento urbanístico: de la controversia a la renovación. Diputación de Barcelona, Xarxa de Municipios.
• RIVOLIN. U. & A. FALUDI (2005): «The hidden face of the European Spatial Planning. Innovations in governance». European Planning Studies, 13, 2: 195-215.
• VANOLO, A. (2010): «European Spatial Planning between competitiveness and territorial cohesion: shadows of neo-liberalism». European Planning Studies, 18.
• VETTORETTO, L. (2009). «A preliminaty critique of the best and good practices approach in european spatial planning and policy-making». European Planning Studies, 17: 1067-1083.
• Vonk, G. & S. Geertman & P. Schot (2005). «Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems». Environment and Planning A, 37: 909-924.