La relación entre la propiedad institucional y de los directivos y el desempeño medioambiental

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aguilera, R.V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., Jackson, G., 2008. An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science 19, 475-492.
• Al-Najjar, B., 2010. Corporate governance and institutional ownership: evidence from Jordan. Corporate Governance, International Journal of Business in Society. 10, 176-190.
• Álvarez-Gil, M.J., de Burgo Jiménez, J., Céspedes Lorente, J., 2001. Un análisis exploratorio de las estrategias medioambientales y el contexto organizativo de los hoteles espa{ogonek} noles. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 8, 5-32.
• Aragón-Correa, J.A., García-Morales, V.J., Hurtado-Torres, N.E., 2005. Un modelo explicativo de las estrategias medioambientales avanzadas para peque{ogonek}nas y medianas empresas y su influencia en los resultados. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 25, 29-52.
• Aragón-Correa, J.A., Sharma, S., 2003. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy ofManagement Review 28, 71-88.
• Bainbridge, S.M., 2008. The New Corporate Governance in theory and practice. Oxford University Press Inc, Nueva York
• Balaguer Franch, M.R., 2007. La inversión socialmente responsable y la responsabilidad social empresarial en los mercados financieros: una aplicación a las instituciones gestoras en Espa{ogonek}na. http://www.cnmv.es/DocPortal/Publicaciones/MONOGRAFIAS/MON200727.pdf
• Bansal, P., 2005. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26, 197-218.
• Bansal, P., Clelland, I., 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal 47, 93-103.
• Bansal, P., Hunter, T., 2003. Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 289-299.
• Bansal, P., Roth, K., 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43, 717-736.
• Baysinger, B.D., Kosnik, R.D., Turk, T.A., 1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal 34, 205-214.
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Larraza-Kintana, M., 2010. Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled-Firms Pollute Less? Administrative Science Quarterly 55, 82-113.
• Berrone, P., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., 2009. Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal 52, 103-106.
• Buysse, K., Verbeke, A., 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24, 453-470.
• Christmann, P., 2004. Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal 47, 747-760.
• Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Sharma, P., 1999 Summer. Defining the Family Business by Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19-39.
• Carbon Diclosure Project, 2008. Global 500 Report. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), www.cdproject.net
• Carbon Diclosure Project (2009): Espa{ogonek}na: las 85 mayores empresas por capitalización. Ecología y Desarrollo, www.ecodes.org
• Cordano, M., Frieze, I.H., 2000. Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal 43, 627-641.
• Darnall, N., Edwards, D.J., 2006. Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal 27, 301-320.
• David, P., Hitt, M.A., Insead, J.G., 2001. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Academy of Management Journal 44, 144-158.
• David, P., Kochhar, R., Levitas, E., 1998. The effect of institutional investors on the level and mix of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal 41, 200-208.
• Delgado-Ceballos, J. y Rueda-Manzanares, A., 2010. Public Disclosure of Corporate Environmental Performance: Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs). En: Stoner, J.A.F., Wankel, C., (Eds). Global Sustainability as a Business Imperative. Palgrave Macmillan, Nueva York
• Delmas, M., Russo, M.V., Montes-Sancho, M.J., 2007. Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management Journal 28, 189-209.
• EUROSIF, 2008. European SRI Study 2008. http://www.eurosif.org/publications/sri studies
• Fama, E.F., Jensen, M.C., 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325.
• Flannery, B.L., May, D.R., 2000. Environmental ethical decision making in the U.S. metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal 43, 642-662.
• Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Galve-Górriz, C., 2001. Repercusión de las inversiones en protección del medio ambiente en la productividad de las empresas espa{ogonek}nolas: un análisis empírico. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 8, 33-50.
• Garrido, J.M., 2002. La distribución y el control del poder en las sociedades cotizadas y los inversores institucionales. Publicaciones del Real Colegio de Espa{ogonek}na, Bolonia 2002.
• Goldman, M.D., Filleben, E.M., 2000. Corporate Governance: Current Trends and Likely Developments for the Twenty-First Century. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 25, 683-713.
• González, J.A., Junquera, B., Fernández, E., 2006. Regulación medioambiental preventiva y estrategia de producción de las empresas recuperadoras de automóviles. Un análisis de casos. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 27, 9-32.
• Graves, S.B., 1988. Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer Industry. Academy of Management Journal 31, 417-428.
• Graves, S.B., Waddock, S.A., 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 37, 1034-1046.
• Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Rolph, E., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., 2008. «Análisis multivariante»; traducción Esme Prentice, Diego Cano; revisión técnica y compilación de las lecturas complementarias Mónica Gómez Suárez. Prentice Hall Iberia, Madrid
• Hansen, G.S., Hill, C.W.L., 1991. Are institutional investors myopic? A time-series study of four technology-driven industries. Strategic Management Journal 12, 1-16.
• Hart, S.L., 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20, 986-1014.
• Henriques, I., Sadorsky, P., 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42, 87-99.
• Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Johnson, R.A., Grossman, W., 2002. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal 45, 697-716.
• Johnson, R.A., Greening, D.W., 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 42, 564-576.
• Kassinis, G., Vafeas, N., 2002. Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal 23, 399-415.
• Kassinis, G., Vafeas, N., 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal 49, 145-159.
• King, A.A., Lenox, M.J., 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal 43, 698-716.
• Klassen, R.D., Whybark, D.C., 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal 42, 599-615.
• Kochhar, R., David, P., 1996. Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal 17, 73-84.
• Kolk, A., 2003. Trends in sustainability reporting by the fortune global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment 12, 279-291.
• Kolk, A., 2008. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment 17, 1-15.
• Lewis, G.J., Harvey, B., 2001. Perceived environmental uncertainty: The extension of miller's scale to the natural environment. Journal of Management Studies 38, 201-233.
• López, M.D., Molina, J.F., Claver, E., 2008. Factores que condicionan la percepción del directivo sobre el medioambiente. Un estudio Qual/Quan. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 37, 123-172.
• Majumdar, S.K., Marcus, A.A., 2001. Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulations. Academy of Management Journal 44, 170-179.
• Marcus, A., Fremeth, A., 2009. Green management matters regardless. The Academy of Management Perspectives 23, 17-26.
• Marcus, A., Geffen, D., 1998. The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation. Strategic Management Journal 19, 1145-1168.
• Porter, M.E., Van Der Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environmentcompetitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 97-118.
• Ramus, C.A., Steger, U., 2000. The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee "ecoinitiatives" at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal 43, 605-626.
• Rugman, A.M., Verbeke, A., 1998. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal 19, 363-375.
• Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A., 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40, 534-559.
• Russo, M.V., Harrison, N.S., 2005. Organizational design and environmental performance clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal 48, 582-593.
• Sanders, W.G., 2001. Behavioral responses of CEOs stock ownerships and stock option pay. Academy of Management Journal 44, 477-492.
• Sharma, S., 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43, 681-697.
• Sharma, S., Henriques, I., 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal 26, 159-180.
• Sharma, A., Kesner, I.F., 1996. Diversifying entry: Some ex ante explanations for postentry survival and growth. Academy of Management Journal 39, 635-677.
• Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H., 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19, 729-753.
• Shrivastava, P., 1995a. Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16, 183-200.
• Shrivastava, P., 1995b. The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review 20, 936-960.
• Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T., 2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal 21, 689-705.
• Wright, P., Ferris, S.P., Sarin, A., Awasthi, V., 1996. Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Academy of Management Journal 39, 441-463.
• Zahra, S.A., Neubaum, D.O., Huse, M., 2000. Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management 26, 947-976.