Modelo para la evaluación de ontologías. Aplicación en Onto-Satcol

Referencias bibliográficas

• Boehm, B. W. (1981): Software Engineering Economics. New York; Prentice-Hall.
• Brank, J.; Grobelnik, M., y Mladenic, D. (2005): A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. Paper presented at the SIKDD 2005 at multiconference IS 2005, Ljubljana, Slove nia. http://eprints.pascal-network.org/archive/00001198/01/BrankEvaluationSiKDD2005.pdf.
• Brewster, C.; Alani, H.; Dasmahapatra, S., y Wilks, Y. (2004): Data Driven Ontology Evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2004), Lisboa, Portugal.
• Domíguez, S. (2010): PROTEX (Version beta) [Lematizador]. Santa Clara, Cuba: Universidad Central de las Villas, Departamento de automática.
• Evermann, J. E., y Fang, J. (2010): Evaluating ontologies: Towards a cognitive measure of quality. Information Systems, vol. 35, 391-403.
• Fahad, M., y Abdul Qadir, M. (2008): A Framework for Ontology Evaluation. Paper presented at the Supplementary Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS’08), Toulouse, France. http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen. de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-354/p59r.pdf.
• Fellbaum, C. (1998): WordNet – An Electronic Lexical Database. Massachusetts: MIT-Press.
• Fernández-Breis, J. T.; Egaña Aranguren, M., y Stevens, R. (2009): Quality evaluation framework for bio-ontologies. Paper presented at the ICBO: International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, Buffalo: New York.
• Fernández-López, M.; Gómez-Pérez, A., y Juristo, N. (1997): Methontology: from ontological art towarads ontological engineering. Paper presented at the Spring Symposium on Ontological. Engineering of AAAI, California.
• Gangemi, A.; Catenacci, C.; Ciaramita, M., y Lehmann, J. (2005): A Theoretical Framework for Ontology Evaluation and Validation.
• Gómez Pérez, A. (1994): Some Ideas and Examples to Evaluate Ontologies. Conference paper at an IEEE Event.
• Grunninger, M., y Fox, M. S. (1995): Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. Paper presented at the Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, IJCAI-95, Montreal.
• Guarino, N., y Welty, C. (2002): Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM, vol. 45 (2), 61-65.
• Hartmann, J.; Spyns, P.; Giboin, A.; Maynard, D.; Cuel, R.; Suárez-Figueroa, M. C., y otros. (2005): D1.2.3 Methods for ontology evaluation, Knowledgeweb.
• Kent, A. (1955): Machine literature searching. VIII. Operational Criteria for Designing Information Retrieval Systems. American Documentation, vol. 6 (2), 93-101.
• Kuhn, T. (1979): The structure of scientifi c revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Leiva-Mederos, A.; Senso, J. A.; Domínguez-Velasco, S., e Hípola, P. (2009): An Automat for the Semantic Processing of Structured Information. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications.
• Lozano-Tello, A., y Gómez-Pérez, A. (2004): ONTOMETRIC: A method to choose the appropriate ontology. Journal of Database Management, vol. 15 (2).
• Maedche, A.; Motik, B.; Stojanovic, L.; Studer, R., y Volz, R. (2003): Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management. EEE Intelligent System, 26-34.
• Maedche, A., y Staab, S. (2002): Measuring Similarity between Ontologies. Paper presented at the In: Proc. of the European Conference on Knowledge Acquisition and Management – EKAW-2002, Madrid: Spain.
• Maiga, G., y Ddembe, W. (2008): A Systems Approach to User Evaluation of Biomedical Ontologies Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Ontologies in Interactive Systems.
• Ning, H., y Shihan, D. (2006): Structure-Based Ontology Evaluation. Paper presented at the International Conference on e-business on Engineering.
• Obrst, L.; Werner, C.; Inderjeet, M.; Ray, S., y Smith, B. (2007): The Evaluation of Ontologies: Toward Improved Semantic Interoperability. En C. J. O. Baker & K.-H. Cheung (Eds.), Semantic Web: Revolutionizing Knowledge Discovery in the Life Sciences: Springer.
• Paslaru Bontas, E., y Mochol, M. (2005): A Cost Model for Ontology Engineering. En F. U. Berlin (Ed.).
• Qadir, M., y Noshairwan, W. (2007): Warnings for Disjoint Knowledge Omission in Ontologies. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW07).
• Ramos, E.; Núñez, H., y Casañas, R. (2009): Esquemas para evaluar ontologías únicas para un dominio de conocimiento. Revista Venezolana de Información, Tecnología y Cococimiento, vol. 6 (1), 57-71.
• Sabou, M.; López, V.; Motta, E., y Uren, V. (2006): Ontology Selection:Ontology Evaluation on the Real Semantic Web. Paper presented at the WWW2006, Edimburgo.
• Salton, G.; Wong, A., y Yang, C. S. (1975): A Vector Space Model for Automatic Indexing. Communications of the ACM, vol. 18 (11), 613-620.
• Spyns, P. (2005): EvaLexon: Assessing triples mined from texts. Bruselas.
• Staab, S. (2004): Why Evaluate Ontology Technologies? Because It Works! IEEE Intelligent Systems.
• Uschold, M., y King, M. (1995): Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing.
• Yao, H.; Mark, A.; Orme, M., y Etzkorn, L. (2005): Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application. Journal of Computer Science, vol. 1 (1), 107-113.
• Yu, J.; James, A. T., y Tam, A. (2009): Requirements-oriented methodology for evaluating ontologies. Information Systems, vol. 34, 766-791.
• Zhang, T.; Xu, D., y Chen, J. (2008): Application-oriented purely semantic precision and recall for ontology mapping evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 21, 794-799.