Influencia de los contactos de negocios en la orientación a la innovación de las empresas de mujeres

  1. Fuentes Fuentes, María del Mar
  2. Ruiz Arroyo, Matilde
  3. Bojica Bojica, Ana María
Revista:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Año de publicación: 2012

Título del ejemplar: Mujer y desafío emprendedor en España

Número: 383

Páginas: 85-94

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Economía industrial

Resumen

Este trabajo estudia los efectos de los contactos de negocios en la orientación a la innovación en empresas de mujeres. Para contrastar estas hipótesis analizamos dos muestras diferenciadas, referidas a España y al año 2006. El análisis de ambos conjuntos de datos indica que el conocer a un emprendedor puede constituir un modelo a seguir, más que un contacto útil para obtener recursos destinados a innovar. Asimismo, la edad de la empresa resulta fundamental para determinar qué contactos de negocios son relevantes para su orientación a la innovación. A medida que la empresa se consolida, la variedad de contactos relevantes aumenta

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AHUJA G. (2000): Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, nº 45, pp. 425-455.
  • ALLEN, E., ELAM, A., LANGOWITZ, N. Y DEAN, M. (2008): 2007 Report on Women y Entrepreneurship. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. The Center for Women’s Leadership at Babson College, Massachusetts, USA.
  • ANNA A.L., CHYLER G.N., JANSEN E. y MERO N.P. (2000): Women business owners in traditional and non-traditional industries. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 15, nº 3, pp. 279-303.
  • BATJARGAL, B. (2003): Social Capital y Entrepreneurial Performance in Russia: A Longitudinal Study, Organization Studies, nº 24, pp. 535-556.
  • BECKER, W. y DIETZ, J. (2004): «R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms –evidence for the German manufacturing industry». Research Policy, nº 33, pp. 209-223.
  • BLAKE M. y HANSON, S. (2005): Rethinking innovation: context and gender. Environment and Planning, nº 37, pp. 681-701.
  • BODEN, R. y NUCCI, A. (2000): On The Survival Prospects Of Men’s and Women’s New Business Ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 15, nº 4, pp. 347-362.
  • BRUSH C., CARTER N., GREENE P., GATEWOOD E., y HART M. (2001): The Diana Project. Women business owners and equity capital: The myths dispelled. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership at the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation: Missouri.
  • CAPALDO, A. (2007): Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability, Strategic Management Journal, nº 28, pp. 585-608.
  • CHAN, S. y FOSTER, M. J. (2001): Strategy formulation in small business: The Hong Kong experience. International Small Business Journal, vol. 19, nº 3, pp. 56-71.
  • CHESBROUGH H. (2003): Open Innovation. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • COLEMAN, S. (2000): Access to capital y terms of credit: a comparison of men and women-owned small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 38, nº 3, pp. 37-52.
  • CROMIE, S. y BIRLEY, S. (1992). Networking by female business owners in Northern Ireland. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 7, nº 3, pp. 237-251.
  • DAVIDSSON, P. y B. HONIG (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, nº 18, pp. 301-331.
  • DE BRUIN, A., WELTER, F. y BRUSH, C.G. (2006): Introduction to special issue: Advancing Cumulative Knowledge on Women’s Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory y Practice, vol. 30, nº 5, pp. 585-593.
  • DECAROLIS, D.M., LITZKY, B.E. y EDDLESTON, K.A. (2009): Why Networks Enhance the Progress of New Venture Creation: The Influence of Social Capital and Cognition, Entrepreneurship Theory y Practice, March, pp. 527-545.
  • DHANARAJ, C. y PARKHE, A. (2006): Orchestrating innovation network. Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, nº 3, pp. 659-669.
  • DÍAZ, M.C.y CARTER, S. (2009): Resource mobilization through business owners networks: is gender a issue?. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, nº 3, pp. 226-252.
  • DU RIETZ, A. y HENREKSON, M. (2000): Testing the Female Underperformance Hypothesis, Small Business Economics, vol. 14, nº 1, pp. 1-10.
  • ELFRING, T. & HULSINK, W. (2003): Networks in entrepreneurship: the case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, nº 21, pp. 409–422.
  • FOSS, L. (2010): Research on entrepreneur networks. The case for a constructionist feminist theory perspective. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, vol. 2, nº 1, pp. 83-102.
  • FOSS, N.J., LAURSEN, K. y PEDERSEN, T. (2011). Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices. Organization Science, vol. 22nº 4, pp. 980-999.
  • GELETKANYCZ, M.A., BOYD, B.K. y FINKELSTEIN, S. (2001): The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, nº 22, pp. 889-898.
  • GREVE A. y SALAFF J.W. (2003). Social Networks y Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall, pp. 1-22.
  • GUPTA, A.K., TESLUK, E.G. y TAYLOR, M.S. (2007). Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science, vol. 18, nº 6, pp. 885-897.
  • HAIR, J.F., YERSON, R.E., TATHAM, R.L. y BLACK, W.C. (1999): Análisis Multivariante (5th Edition). Madrid: Prentice-Hall.
  • HAMPTON, A., COOPER, S. y McGOWAN, P. (2009): Female Entrepreneurial Networks and Networking Activity in Technologybased Ventures: An Exploratory Study. International Small Business Journal, nº 27 (April), pp.193-214.
  • HISRICH, R. y BRUSH, C. (1986): The woman entrepreneur. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • HOANG, H. y B. ANTONCIC (2003): Network-based research in entrepreneurship. A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, nº 18, pp. 165-187.
  • HURLEY, R.F. y HULT G.T.M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, nº 62, pp. 42-54.
  • INKPEN, A.C. y TSANG, E.W.K. (2005): Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, vol. 30, nº 1, pp. 146-165.
  • JOHANNISSON, B. (2000): Networking y entrepreneurial growth. In: Sexton, D., Lyström, H. (Eds.), Hybook of Entrepreneurship. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 368.386.
  • KAJIKAWA, Y.,TAKEDA, Y., y MATSUSHIMA, K.I. (2010): Multiscale analysis of interfirm networks in regional clusters. Technovation, nº 30, pp. 168.180.
  • KATILA, R. y SHANE, S. (2005): When does lack of resources make new firms innovative?. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, nº 5, pp. 814-829.
  • KATZ, J.A. y WILLIAMS, P.M. (1997): Gender, self-employment and weak-tie networking through formal organizations. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, vol. 9, nº 3,pp, 183-197.
  • KERLINGER, F. N. (2002): Investigación del comportamiento. Madrid: McGraw Hill.
  • KLYVER, K. & GRANT, S. (2010): Gender differences in entrepreneurial networking and participation. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, vol. 2, nº 3, pp. 213-227.
  • LANGOWITZ, N. y MINNITI, M. (2007): The entrepreneurial propensy of women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 31, nº 3, pp. 341-364.
  • LAURSEN K., y SALTER, A. (2006): Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms, Strategic Management Journal, nº 27, pp. 131-150.
  • LECHNER, C. y DOWLING, M. (2003). Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, nº 15, pp. 1-26.
  • LEVIE, J. y AUTIO, E. (2008): A Theoretical Grounding y Test of the GEM Model, Small Business Economics,nº 31, pp. 235-263.
  • LILIEN, G.L., MORRISON, P.D., SEARLS, K., SONNACK, M. y VON HIPPEL, E. (2002): Performance assessment of the lead user ideageneration process for new product development. Management Science, nº 48, pp. 1042-1059.
  • LUMPKIN, G.T. y DESS, G.G. (1996): Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, nº 21, pp. 135-172.
  • MAURER, I., BARTSCH, V. y EBERS, M. (2011): The Value of Intraorganizational Social Capital: How it Fosters Knowledge Transfer, Innovation Performance, y Growth. Organization Studies, nº 32, pp. 157-185.
  • McGOWAN, P. y HAMPTON, A. (2006): An exploration of the networking practices of female entrepreneurs, in Henry, C., Johnston, K. (Eds), Promoting Female Entrepreneurship, Routledge, London.
  • MENZIES, T., DIOCHON, M. y GASSE, Y. (2004). Examining Venture-Related Myths concerning Women Entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, vol. 9, nº 2, pp. 89-97.
  • MITRA, R. (2002). The Growth Pattern of Women-Run Enterprises: An Empirical Study in India. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship vol. 7, nº 2, pp. 217-237.
  • MOORE, D.P. y BUTTNER, E.H. (1997): Women Entrepreneurs: Moving Beyond the Glass Ceiling. Sage Publications, Thousy Oaks.
  • O’CONNOR, G.y AYERS, A.D., (2005): Building a radical innovation competency. Research Technology Management, nº 1, pp. 23-31.
  • ORSER, B.J., RIDING, A.L. y MANLEY, K. (2006): Women Entrepreneurs and Financial Capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 30, nº 5, pp. 643-665.
  • ORZEN, E. y R.A. BARON (2007): Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, nº 22, pp. 174-192.
  • RENZULLI, L., ALDRICH, H. y MOODY, J. (2000): Family Matters: Gender, Networks, and Entrepreneurial Outcomes. Social Forces, vol. 79, nº 2, pp. 523-546.
  • REYNOLDS, P., BOSMA, N., AUTIO, E., HUNT, S., DE BONO, N., SERVAIS, I., LOPEZ-GARCIA, P. y CHIN, N. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998-2003, Small Business Economics, vol. 24, nº 3, pp. 205-231.
  • ROBINSON, S.y STUBBERUD, H.A. (2009): Sources of advice in entrepreneurship: gender differences in business owners’ social networks. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, nº 13, pp. 83-101.
  • ROSA, P y HAMILTON, D. (1994): Gender and Ownership in UK Small Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice, vol. 18, nº 3, pp. 11-28.
  • SALOMO, S., TALKE, K. y STRECKER, N., 2008. Innovation field orientation y its effect on innovativeness and firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 25, nº 6, pp. 560-576.
  • SHAW, E., MARLOW, S., LAM, W. y CARTER, S. (2009): Gender and entrepreneurial capital: implications for firm performance. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 25-41.
  • SLOTTE-KOCK S. y COVIELLO, N. (2010): Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, vol. 34, nº 1, pp. 31-57.
  • SORENSON, R.L., FOLKER, C.A. y BRIGHAM, K.H. (2008): The Collaborative Network Orientation: Achieving Business Success through Collaborative Relationships, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, July, pp. 615-634.
  • TSAI, K.H. (2009): Collaborative networks y product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, nº 38, pp. 765-778.
  • UZZI, B. (1997): Social structure y competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, nº 42, pp. 35-67.
  • WASTI, S.N. y LIKER, J.K. (197): Risky business or competitive power? Supplier involvement in Japanese product design. Journal of Production and Innovation Management, nº 14, pp. 337-355.
  • YLI-RENKO, H., AUTIO, E. y SAPIENZA, H.J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisitions, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, nº 6/7, pp. 587-613.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet