"Having it All"Women's Perception of Impact of Female Promotion on Threat of Domestic Violence

Referencias bibliográficas

• Amnesty International (2007). Report 2007 - The state of the world's human rights. Madrid, Spain: Author.
• Anderson, K. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 655-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353952
• Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.5.651
• Babcock, J., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N., & Gottman, J. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.61.1.40
• Cameron, C. (1977). Sex-role attitudes. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Attitudes and opinions (pp. 339-359). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Crowson, H. M., DeBacker, T., & Thoma, S. J. (2006). The role of authoritarianism, perceived threat, and need for closure or structure in predicting post-9/11 attitudes and beliefs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 733-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.6.733-750
• Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1998). Rethinking violence against women. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Dutton, D. G. (1988). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. Needham heights, MA: Ally and Bacon.
• Exposito, F., & Moya, M. (2005). Violencia de genero. In F. Exposito & M. Moya (Eds.), Aplicando la Psicología Social (pp. 201-227). Madrid, Spain: Piramide
• Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2000). The control motive in intimate partner violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 86-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2695883
• Fischer, A. R. (2006). Women's benevolent sexism as a reaction to hostility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 410-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00316.x
• Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (1995). Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organizational change. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 97-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01311.x
• Fleury, R. E., Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (2000). When ending the relationship does not end the violence: women's experiences of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women, 6, 1363-1383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10778010022183695
• Frese, B., Moya, M., & Lopez Megias, J. (2004). Social perception of rape. How rape myths acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. The Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 143-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260503260245
• Frieze, I. H., & McHugh, M. C. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 449-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00268.x
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491
• Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J, Abrams, D., Masser, B., Lopez, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.763
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.2.109
• Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., Wells, R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713
• Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., & Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 675-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351768
• Instituto de la Mujer (2009). Estadísticas. Situación laboral [Statistics. employment situation]. Retrieved from http://www.inmujer.migualdad.es/mujer/mujeres/cifras/empleo
• Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353683
• Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
• Lenton, R. L. (1995). Power versus feminist theories of wife abuse. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 305-330.
• Mahalik, J. R., Aldarondo, E., Gilbert-Gokhale, S., & Shore, E. (2005). The role of insecure attachment and gender role stress in predicting controlling behaviors in men who batter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 617-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269688
• Mahlstedt, D. L., & Welsh, L. A. (2005). Perceived causes of physical assault in heterosexual dating relationships. Violence Against Women, 11, 447-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801204273298
• McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00097.x
• Millet, K. (1970). Sexual Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
• Morales-Marente, E. (2005). Análisis psicosocial del poder en las relaciones de género (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Granada. Granada, Spain.
• Moya, M., & Exposito, F. (2001). Nuevas formas, viejos intereses: Neosexismo en varones españoles [New forms, old interests: Neosexism in Spanish men]. Psicothema, 13, 643-649.
• Moya, M., Glick, P., Exposito, F., De Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It's for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women's reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421-1434.
• O'Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: the roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718-1729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167205278261
• Pratto, F., & Walker, A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd Ed., pp. 242-268). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
• Sagrestano, L. M., Heavey, C. L., & Christensen, A. (1999). Perceived power and physical violence in marital conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 65-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00105
• Sanday, P. R. (1990). Fraternity gang rape: Sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus. New York, NY: New York University Press.
• Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 3-32). New York, NY: Praeger.
• Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c'est pareil [Neo-sexism: The more things change, the more they stay the same]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218007
• Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021342912248
• White, J. W. (2001). Aggression and Gender. In J. Worell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender (Vol. 1, pp. 81-93) New York, N.Y: Academic Press.
• White, J. W., & Kowalski, R. M. (1998). Male violence toward women: An integrated perspective. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnesrstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research and implications for social policy (pp. 202-228). New York, N.Y: Academic Press.
• Wuest, J., Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., & Berman, H. (2003). Intrusion: The central problem form family health promotion among children and single mothers after leaving an abusive partner. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 597-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732303013005002
• Yllo, K. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies in family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Zuo, J., & Bian, J. (2001). Gendered resources, division of housework, and perceived fariness. A case in urban China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1122-1133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01122.x