Basketball training influences shot selection assessmenta multi-attribute decision-making approach

  1. Llorca-Miralles, J.
  2. Sánchez Delgado, Guillermo
  3. Piñar López, María Isabel
  4. Cárdenas Vélez, David
  5. Perales López, José César
Revista:
Revista de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1132-239X,  1988-5636

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Páginas: 223-226

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del deporte

Resumen

In spite of the fact that shoot selection is a crucial ingredient of performance in basketball, the judgment and decision making processes involved in it have been largely neglected. In the present work, we explore individuals' strategies to assess the adequateness of shooting (in a simulation laboratory task) in situations varying in the degree of physical defensive pressure, rebound, defensive balance and shooting distance. Our results showed that the four target dimensions have an impact on participants' judgments. More importantly, training influences the degree to which one of the non-obvious dimensions (defensive balance) is taken into account by participants in order to make their judgments. These results stress the necessity to develop measures of shot selection decisional quality beyond scoring rates.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alarcón, F. (2008). Incidencia de un programa de entrenamiento para la mejora táctica colectiva del ataque posicional de un equipo de baloncesto masculino. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Granada.
  • Alarcón, F., Cárdenas, D., Miranda, M. T. and Ureña, N. (2010). El proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de la táctica en baloncesto. Murcia: Diego Marín.
  • Alarcón, F. Cárdenas, D. Miranda, M. T., Ureña, N. and Piñar, M. I. (2011). Influencia del programa de entrenamiento reflexivo sobre el conocimiento declarativo de un equipo de baloncesto. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 11(1), 19-28.
  • Bar-Eli, M., Avugos, S. and Raab, M. (2006). Twenty years of "hot hand" research: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 525-553.
  • Burns, B. D. (2004). Heuristics as beliefs and as behaviors: The adaptiveness of the "hot hand". Cognitive Psychology, 48(3), 295-331.
  • Gómez-Ruano, M. A., Lorenzo, M., Ortega. E. and Olmedilla, A. (2007). Diferencias de los indicadores de rendimiento en baloncesto femenino entre ganadores y perdedores en función de jugar como local o como visitante. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 16(1), 41-54
  • Perales, J. C., Cárdenas, D., Piñar, M. I., Sánchez, G. and Courel, J. (2011). El efecto diferencial de la instrucción incidental e intencional en el aprendizaje de las condiciones para la decisión de tiro en baloncesto. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 20(2), 729-745.
  • Rao, Justin M. (2009). Experts' Perceptions of Autocorrelation: The Hot Hand Fallacy Among Professional Basketball Players. Unpublished technical manuscript. California. San Diego. Downloaded from http://www.justinmrao.com/ playersbeliefs.pdf. (July 11th 2012).
  • Romanowich, P., Bourret, J. and Vollmer, T. R. (2007). Further analysis of the matching law to describe two-and three-point shot allocation by professional basketball players. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 311-315.
  • Sporis, G., Sango, J., Vucetic, V. and Maaina, T. (2006). The latent structure of standard game efficiency indicators in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 6(1), 120-129.
  • Trininic, S., Dizdar, D. and Luksic, E. (2002). Differences between winning and defeated top quality basketball teams in final tournaments of European club championship. Collegium Antropologicum, 26(2), 521-531.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet