When interdependence shapes social perceptioncooperation and competition moderate implicit gender stereotyping

  1. Lemus Martín, Soledad de 1
  2. Bukowski, Marcin 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Jagellonian University
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2013

Número: 16

Páginas: 1-7

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2013.96 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

We examined the influence of interdependence goals on the accessibility of implicit gender stereotypical associations. Participants were asked to cooperate with or compete against a woman on a mathematical abilities task and subsequently the relative activation of positive and negative warmth and competence traits was measured using a primed categorization task. Results showed that female primes (vs. male primes) facilitated the activation of low warmth and high competence in the competition condition, whereas high warmth was activated in the cooperation condition and no differences were found for competence traits. These results are discussed referring to the stereotype content model and the compensation effect in person perception. The goal dependent nature of implicit gender stereotypes is emphasized.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abele A., & Wojciszke B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751.
  • Bem S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 42, 155-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fh0036215.
  • Blair I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207%2FS15327957PSPR0603-8.
  • Brambilla M., Rusconi P., Sacchi S., & Cherubini P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744.
  • Bukowski M., Moya M., de Lemus S., & Szmajke A. (2009). Selective stereotype activation: The joint impact of interpersonal goals and task context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 317-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fejsp.585.
  • Caprariello P. A., Cuddy A. J. C., & Fiske S. T. (2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the stereotype content model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 147-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1368430208101053.
  • de Lemus S., Moya M., Bukowski M., & Lupianez J. (2008). Medicion de la activacion automatica de las dimensiones estereotipicas de genero mediante un paradigma de priming. [Automatic activation of competence and warmth dimensions in the case of gender stereotyping]. Psicologica, 29, 115-132.
  • de Lemus S., Spears R., Bukowski M., Moya M., & Lupianez J. (2013). Reversing implicit gender stereotype activation as a function of exposure to traditional gender roles. Social Psychology, 44, 109-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000140.
  • Devine P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.56.1.5.
  • Eagly A. H., & Mladinic A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167289154008.
  • Eckes T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A1021020920715.
  • Fazio R. H., Jackson J., Dunton B., & Williams C. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.69.6.1013.
  • Fiske S. T., Cuddy A., & Glick P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.92.4.631.
  • Fiske S. T., Cuddy A., Glick P., & Xu J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and Warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.82.6.878.
  • Fiske S. T., Lin M., & Neuberg S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Fiske S., & Neuberg S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Judd C., James-Hawkins L., Yzerbyt V., & Kashima Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.89.6.899.
  • Kervyn N., Yzerbyt V., Judd C., & Nunes A. (2009). A question of compensation: The social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 828-842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0013320.
  • Kunda Z., & Thagard P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits and behaviors: A parallelconstraint- satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0033-295X.103.2.284.
  • Lenton A. P., Sedikides C., & Bruder M. (2009). A metaanalysis on the malleability of automatic gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 183-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6402.2009.01488.x.
  • Neuberg S. L., & Fiske S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracydriven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.53.3.431.
  • Ratcliff R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.114.3.510.
  • Rudman L. A., Greenwald A. G., & McGhee D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279009.
  • Ruscher J. B., & Fiske S. T. (1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 832-842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.58.5.832.
  • Russell A. M. T., & Fiske S. T. (2008). It's all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1193-1201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fejsp.539.
  • Seidenberg M. S. (1990). Lexical access: A theoretical soup stone? In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 33-71). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Skowronski J. J., & Carlston D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin 105, 131-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0033-2909.105.1.131.
  • Spencer S. J., Fein S., Wolfe C. T., Fong C., & Dunn M. A. (1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1139-1152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F01461672982411001.
  • Wade M. L., & Brewer M. B. (2006). The structure of female subgroups: An exploration of ambivalent stereotypes. Sex Roles, 54, 753-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9043-x.
  • Wojciszke B. (2005). Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F10463280500229619.
  • Wojciszke B., Abele A. E., & Baryła W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973-990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.595.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet