Comparación entre diferentes procedimientos de actuación en las úlceras por presión

  1. Schmidt Río-Valle, Jacqueline
  2. García García, Inmaculada
  3. Gázquez López, María
Journal:
Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

ISSN: 1695-6141

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 13

Issue: 4

Pages: 44-56

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/EGLOBAL.13.4.178611 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

More publications in: Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the different procedures in the pressure ulcer (UPP) of the coccyx and heels and to compare results in the course of the ulcer in two different hospitals. Method: Observational study. The analysed dates were obtained over three months from May to July in two hospitals: Public Hospital (HP) and Concerted Hospital (HC). 25 UPP were followed, 11 located in coccyx and 14 in heels. 18 patients participated, 9 in the HP and 9 in the HC, all patients signed informed consent. The analysed dates were Barthel scale, Pfeiffer scale, Mini Nutritional Assesment (MNA) and the wound evolution by National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), photographs taken on site and the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Heading (PUSH). Results: PUSH was the best instrument used to assess the evolution of the UPP and to discern changes in the lesions. Although there is a protocol in the treatment of UPP there was certain variability in the performance of it in both hospitals. Statistically significant positive trends in injuries in heels were found by using PUSH as method of evaluation in the HP.

Bibliographic References

  • (1) Heras Fortuny R, Morros Torné C, Álvarez carrera A, Moix Manubens I, Sabria Martínez I, Santaeulàlia Potrony L. Prevalencia de úlceras por presión en atención primaria en dos comarcas catalanas. Enferm Clin. 2006; 6(1):35-8.
  • (2) Guía de práctica clínica para la prevención y el tratamiento de las úlceras por presión. Servicio 2007 [guía en Internet] [acceso 6 Mar 2010]: [72 p.]. Disponible en http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/servicioandaluzdesalud/publicaciones/listadodetermin ado.asp?idp=283.
  • (3) Hulsenboom MA, Bours GJ, Halfens RJ. Knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention: a cross-sectional and comparative study among nurses. Bio Med Central Nursing.2007; 6:2.
  • (4) Stausberg J, Lehmann N, Kröger K, Maier I, Schneider H, Niebel W. Increasing pressure ulcer rates and changes in delivery of care: a retrospective analysis at University Clinic. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(11-12):1504-9.
  • (5) Chaves LM, Grydonck MHF, Deefloor T. Protocols for pressure ulcer prevention: are they evidence-based? J Adv Nurs. 2010; 66(3):562-72.
  • (6) Moore Z, Price P. Nurses’ attitudes, behaviours and perceived barriers towards pressure ulcer prevention. J Clin Nurs. 2004; 13(8):942-51.
  • (7) Fernández de Maya J, Richard Martínez M. Variabilidad de la práctica clínica. Situación actual y retos para enfermería. Enferm Clin. 2010; 20(2):114-118.
  • (8) Gunningberg L, Fogelberg-Dahm M, Ehrenberg A. Improved quality and comprehensiveness in nursing documentation of pressure ulcers after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care. J Clin Nurs. 2009; 18(11):1557-64.
  • (9) Domingo Pozo M, Gómez Robles FJ, Torres Figueiras M, Gabaldón Bravo EM. Del cuidado registrado al diagnóstico enfermero. Enferm Clin.2005; 15(5):267-74.
  • (10) Rich SE, Shardell M, Margolis D, Baumgarten M. Pressure ulcer preventive device use among elderly patients early in the hospital stay. Nurs Res. 2009; 58(2):95- 104.
  • (11) Denby A, Rowlands A. The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine the feasibility of implememntign a pressure Ulcer Prevention Protocol in the emergency department (ED). Journal of WOCN. 2010; 37 (1): 35- 38.
  • (12) Zamora Castro S, Flamana Franco MJ, Rivero Acosta Y. Experiencia en la cura de úlceras por presión con sacarosa. Rev Cubana Enfermer. 2006; 22(3).
  • (13) Moore Z, Cowman S. A systematic review of wound cleansing for pressure ulcers. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17(15): 1963-72.
  • (14) Carrera González E, Noa Hernández JE, Marín Rojo CA. Explicación de apósitos de membrana amniótica en pacientes con deterioro de la integridad cutánea. Enferm Clin. 2011; 21(1):43-46.
  • (15) Günes UY. A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH tool) to assess Stage II, Stage III, and Stage IV pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009; 1; 55(5): 48-52.
  • (16) Molina Castillo E. Úlceras por presión. Actualización y puesta al día. 3.ª ed. Jaén: Asociación Alcalá; 2006.
  • (17) Kottner J, DassenT, Lahmann N. Comparison of two skin examination methods for grade 1 pressure ulcers. J Clin Nurs. 2009; 18(17):2464-9.
  • (18) Torra I Bou JE, Rueda López J, Camañes G, Herrero Narváez E, Blanco Blanco J, Ballesté Torralba J et al. Preventing pressure ulcers on the heel: A Canadian cost study. Dermatol Nurs. 2009; 21(5):268-72.
  • (19) Ousey K. Heel ulcerationAn exploration of the issues. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing. 2009; 13 (2): 97-104.
  • (20) Parish LC, Dryjski M, Cadden S. Prospective clinical study of a new adhesive gelling foam dressing in pressure ulcers. Int Wound J. 2008; 5(1):60-7.
  • (21) Hopkins A, Dealey C, Bale S, Defloor T, Worboys F. Patient stories of living with a pressure ulcer. J Adv Nurs. 2006; 56(4), 345–353.
  • (22) Kottner J, Dassen T & Lahmann N (2009). Prevalence of deep tissue injuries in hospitals and nursing homes: Two cross-sectional studies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 47(6):665-70.
  • (23) Kottner J, Antje Tannen A, Dassen T. Hospital pressure ulcer prevalence rates and number of raters. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(11):1550-6.
  • (24) Zapata Sampedro MA, Castro Varela L. Caso clínico. Lesiones por humedad. Enferm Clin. 2009; 19(4):225-230.
  • (25) Defloor T, Schoonhoven L. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs. J Clin Nurs. 2004; 13(8):952-9.
  • (26) Restrepo Medrano JC, Verdú J. Medida de la cicatrización en úlceras por presión. ¿Con qué contamos? GEROKOMOS 2011; 22 (1):35-42.
  • (27) Candela Zamora MD, Martín Gómez MA, Solas Gómez B, Fernández Pérez C, Martín Gonzáles M, Manzanedo Basilio L, et al. Estudio comparativo de efectividad de dos ácidos grasos hiperoxigenados en el tratamiento de úlceras de grado I en pacientes geriátricos hospitalizados. Enferm Clin. 2010; 20(1):10-16.
  • (28) Meesterberends E, Halfens R, Lohrmann C, de Wit R. Pressure ulcer quideline development and dissemination in Europe. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(11-12):1495-503.
  • (29) Ruzafa Martínez M, González María E, Moreno Casbas T, del Río Faes C, Albornoz Muñoz L, Escandell García C. Proyecto de implantación de Guías de Buenas Prácticas en España 2011-2016. Enferm Clin. 2011; 21(5):275-283.
  • (30) Ferrer Solá M, Chirveches Pérez E, Molist Señé G, Molas Puigvila M, Besolí Codina A, Jaumira Areñas E, et al. Prevalencia de la heridas crónicas en una comarca de la provincia de Barcelona. Enferm Clin. 2009; 19(1):4-10.
Data source: Dialnet