El concepto de acoso en el derecho de la Unión Europea

  1. Robles Carrillo, Margarita
Revista:
Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo

ISSN: 1138-4026

Año de publicación: 2014

Año: 18

Número: 49

Páginas: 805-846

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo

Resumen

El acoso es una categoría jurídica relativamente novedosa que se incorpora en el marco de la UE a partir de la década de los años ochenta y es objeto, desde entonces, de un continuo proceso de definición y reformulación. Ese proceso se inicia con la adopción de algunos actos normativos del Consejo y de la Comisión que introducen una concepción amplia y poco precisa del acoso. El concepto normativo de acoso se define a partir del 2000 por una doble vía: por una parte, las directivas europeas establecen un concepto de acoso y otro de acoso sexual; y, por otra parte, la normativa sobre funcionarios y agentes ofrece un concepto de acoso psicológico y otro de acoso sexual. La definición jurisprudencial ha conducido hacia una progresiva objetivación de la noción de acoso y hacia una interpretación conciliadora de los distintos conceptos normativos. A pesar de ello, la ausencia de un concepto normativo único o uniforme de acoso constituye un serio y grave obstáculo para garantizar una protección jurídica eficaz frente a ese fenómeno.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Escobar Pérez, B., Fernández, M. and Mónica, L., 2012. Mobbing: Acoso moral o psicológico en el trabajo. Verba Iuris, 28, pp. 135-151.
  • EUROFOUND, 2012. Fifth European Working Conditions Survey, .
  • Franks, M.A., 2012. Sexual harassment 2.0. Md.L.Rev., 71(3), pp. 655-704.
  • Friedman, G.S. and Whitman, J.Q., 2003. The European Transformation of Harassment Law: Discrimination versus Dignity. Columbia Journal of European Law, 9(2), pp. 241-274.
  • Gimeno Lahoz, R., 2004. La presión laboral tendenciosa (Mobbing), , pp. 29-30.
  • Gonçalves Gouveira, C., 2007. From Laissez-faire to Fair Play: Workplace Violence and Psychological Harassment. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, 65(2), pp. 137-166.
  • Guardo, R.P., 2012. The limitations in the quantification of sexual harassment in the workplace in Spain. Athenea Digital, 12(2), pp. 199-219.
  • Guerrero, M.I.S., 2004. The development of moral harassment (or mobbing) law in Sweden and France as a step towards EU legislation. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 27(2), pp. 477-500.
  • Harthill, S., 2011. Workplace bullying as an occupational safety and health matter: A comparative analysis. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 34(2), pp. 253-301.
  • Hippensteele, S.K., 2006. Mediation Ideology: Navigating Space from Mith to Reality in Sexual Harassment Dispute Resolution. Journal of Gender, Social Policy & The Law, 15.
  • Husbands, R., 1992. Sexual harassment law in employment: An international perspective. International Labour Review, 131(6), pp. 535-559.
  • Kaplan, J.F., 2010. Help is on the way: A recent case sheds light on workplace bullying. Houston Law Review, 47(1), pp. 141-173.
  • Lerouge, L., 2010. Moral harassment in the workplace: French law and european perspectives. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 32(1), pp. 109-152.
  • Lerouge, L. and Hébert, L.C., 2013. The law of workplace harassment of the United States, France, and the European union: Comparative analysis after the adoption of France's new sexual harassment law. CLLPJ, 35(1), pp. 93.
  • Leymann, H., 1996. The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), pp. 165-184.
  • Leymann, H., 1990. Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and victims, 5(2), pp. 119-126.
  • Lippel, K., 2010. The law of workplace bullying: An international overview. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 32(1), pp. 1-13.
  • Liu, X.-., Kwan, H.K. and Chiu, R.K., 2014. Customer sexual harassment and frontline employees' service performance in China. Human Relations, 67(3), pp. 333-356.
  • Medeiros De Oliveira, F. P., 2005. El acoso laboral.
  • Meenan, H., 2014. Age discrimination and the future development of elder rights in the European Union: Walking side by side or hand in hand? Beyond Elder Law: New Directions in Law and Aging. pp. 57-97.
  • Milczarek, M., 2010. Workplace violence and harassment: A European picture. Workplace Violence and Harassment: A European Picture, .
  • Molina Navarrete, C., 2006. La tutela frente al acoso moral en el ámbito de la función pública: Cómo vencer las persistentes resistencias. Acoso moral en el trabajo.Concepto, prevención, tutela procesal y reparación de daños, , pp. 236-237.
  • Olmedo, M. and González, P., 2006. La violencia en el ámbito laboral: La problemática conceptuación del mobbing, su evaluación, prevención y tratamiento. Acción Psicológica, 4(2), pp. 107-128.
  • Owens, J.M., Morgan, J.F. and Gomes, G.M., 2003. Implementing the EU's New Sexual Harassment Directive: Are Employers Entitled to a Defence? Journal of Individual Employment Rights, 11(2), pp. 89-110.
  • Patten, A., 2001. Empty Human Rights Lip Service: France's Roma Expulsions and the Failure of the European Union to Exercise its Racial Equality Directive. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 31, pp. 315-347.
  • Pereira, B., 2013. Du harcèlement moral au harcèlement managérial: Les limites de l'objectivation légale. Revue Francaise de Gestion, 233(4), pp. 33-54.
  • Pesta, B.J., Hrivnak, M.W. and Dunegan, K.J., 2007. Parsing work environments along the dimensions of sexual and non-sexual harassment: Drawing lines in office sand. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 19(1), pp. 45-55.
  • Raver, J.L. and NISHII, L.H., 2010. Once, Twice, or Three Times as Harmful? Ethnic Harassment, Gender Harassment, and Generalized Workplace Harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), pp. 236-254.
  • Rimalt, N., 2008. Stereotyping women, individualizing harassment: The dignitary paradigm of sexual harassment law between the limits of law and the limits of feminism. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 19, pp. 391-447.
  • Robles Carrillo, M., 2014. Los convenios regionales en materia de protección frente a la violencia de género. Violencia de género: Perspectiva multidisciplinar y práctica forense, .
  • Rubenstein, M. and De Vries, I., 1993. Cómo combatir el acoso sexual en el trabajo: Guía para aplicar el Código de conducta de la Comisión europea, .
  • Saguy, A.C., 2000. Employment discrimination or sexual violence? Defining sexual harassment in American and French law. Law and Society Review, 34(4), pp. 1091-1128.
  • Sánchez Pérez, J., 2012. El acoso moral en el trabajo: Una perspectiva global de derecho comparado desde distintos continentes. Revista General de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social, (35), pp. 345-374.
  • Schlachter, M., 2012. The prohibition of age discrimination in labor relations. General Reports of the xviiith Congress of the International Academy o Comparative Law/Rapports Generaux Du xviiieme Congres de l'academie Internationale De Droit Compare. pp. 423-451.
  • Schultz, V., 1998. Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment. Yale Law Journal, 107(6), pp. 1683-1805.
  • Skidmore, P., 2000. Improving the Position of Lesbians and Gay Men at Work in the Light of the Framework Directive for Equal Treatment in Employment: A German Case-Study. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 3, pp. 425-455.
  • Smartt, U., 2001. The stalking phenomenon: Trends in European and international stalking and harassment legislation. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 9(3), pp. 209-232.
  • Squelch, J. and Guthrie, R., 2010. The Australian legal framework for workplace bullying (the law of workplace bullying). Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 32(1), pp. 15-54.
  • Srivastava, D.K. and GU, M., 2009. Law and policy issues on sexual harassment in China: Comparative perspectives. Oregon Review of International Law, 11(43), pp. 43-69.
  • Tobler, C., 2013. The Prohibition of Discrimination in the Union's Layered System of Equality Law: From Early Staff Cases to Mangold Approach. The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case Law, .
  • Toggenburg, G.N., 2001. The race directive: A new dimension in the fight against ethnic discrimination in Europe. European Yearbook of Minority Issues, 1(1), pp. 231-244.
  • Toth, M.A., 2008. The Right to Dignity at Work: Reflections on Article 26 of the Revised European Social Charter. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 29, pp. 275-316.
  • Vallejo Dacosta, R., 2006. Acoso sexual y acoso por razón de sexo: Riesgos de especial incidencia en la mujer trabajadora. Trabajo, (17),.
  • Van Der Aa, S., 2011. International (Cyber)Stalking: Impediments to Investigation and Prosecution.
  • Robles Carrillo, M., 2014. El acoso: Una perspectiva internacional. Tratamiento integral del acoso, .
  • Vicentine Xavier, A., La respuesta jurídica frente al acoso moral en el trabajo, , pp. 30-31.
  • Vickers, L., 2010. Religious Discrimination in the Workplace: An Emerging Hierarchy? Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 12(3), pp. 280-303.
  • Vickers, L., 2006. Is all harassment equal? the case of religious harassment. Cambridge Law Journal, 65(3), pp. 579-605.
  • Welsh, S., Carr, J., Macquarrie, B. and Huntley, A., I'm not thinking of it as sexual harassment.Understyanding Harassment across Race and Citizenship, .
  • Zippel, K., 2009. The European union 2002 directive on sexual harassment: A feminist success. Comparative European Politics, 7(1), pp. 139-157.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet