Spanish Adaptation of the Memory Characteristics Questionnaire (MCQ)

  1. Pegalajar Chica, Joaquín
  2. Acosta Mesas, Alberto
  3. Castillo, Miguel
  4. Higueras Cortés, Lorenzo
  5. Padilla García, José Luis
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 18

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2015.91 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

The Memory Characteristics Questionnaire (MCQ) was developed by Johnson, Foley, Suengas, and Raye (1988) to assess the characteristics of memories of external and internal origin, postulated in the source monitoring model (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993). The MCQ was translated into Spanish using a back-translation method. Psychometric properties of the translated MCQ were tested using responses collected from an experimental study simulating a forensic context. Ten police officers and 8 psychologists individually interviewed 240 university students who completed the MCQ after reporting what they had seen in a film. Half of the participants were asked to tell the truth, while the other half were asked to lie. The results have shown adequate psychometric properties of the Spanish MCQ items for the total sample and across experimental conditions. Cronbach�s alpha value was .79 for the total sample, .78 for the honest condition, and .76 for the lie condition. Validity evidence of dimensionality supports that the factor structure of Spanish MCQ was equivalent to that proposed by the authors of the original version. Also, a two-factor ANOVA (video clip x condition) was performed to analyze experimental data. Neither interaction effects, F(236) = 1.189; p = .277, nor main effects were found to be significant between those asked to tell the truth and those asked to lie. These results demonstrate that the Spanish MCQ has adequate psychometric properties.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Bentler P. M., & Bonnet D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • Caccioppo J. T., & Gardner W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.
  • Corp I. B. M. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NuevaYork, NY: IBM Corp.
  • Feldt L. S. (1969). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach’s alpha or Kuder-Richardson Coefficient Twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika, 34, 363–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289364
  • Hashtroudi S., Johnson M. K., & Chrosniak L. D. (1990). Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Psychology and Aging, 5, 119–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.119
  • Herrero G. (Producer), & Lombardi F. (Director). (1996). Bajo la piel. [Under the skin][Film]. Barberá del Vallés, Spain: (Available from Pioneer Electronics España, S.A. Avd. Salvatella, 122. P.I. Salvatella. Barberá del Vallés. Spain 08210).
  • Higueras L. (2003). Aplicación de la entrevista cognitiva con los criterios del control de fuentes a la evaluación de la credibilidad del testimonio [Application of the cognitive interview with source monitoring criteria for the assessment of the credibility of testimony]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Granada, Spain.
  • International Test Commission (2010). International Test Commission Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. Retrieved from International Test Commission Webpage https://www.intestcom.org/page/16
  • Johnson M. K., Foley M. A., Suengas A., & Raye C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.4.371
  • Johnson M. K., Hashtroudi S., & Lindsay D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.114.1.3
  • Johnson M. K., & Raye C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.88.1.67
  • Johnson M. K., & Raye C. L. (1998). False memories and confabulation. Trends in Cognitive Scicences, 2, 137–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01152-8
  • Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom D. (1993).Testing structural equation modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–317). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom D. (2007). LISREL 8.8. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Kline (1994). A handbook of test construction. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Scholz U., Gutiérrez-Doña B., Sud S., & Schwarzer R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 Countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251.
  • Scott R., & Polk M. (1991). Thelma and Louise.[Film]. (Available from Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment España, S.A Avda. Burgos, 8, Madrid, Spain 28036).
  • Sireci G., & Padilla J. L. (2014). Validity assessments: Introduction to special issue. Psicothema, 26, 97–99.
  • Sporer S. L., & Küpper B. (1995). Realitätüberwachung und die beuerteilung des wahrheitsgehaltes von erzählungen: Eine experimentelle studie [Reality monitoring and assessment of credibility of the stories: An experimental investigation]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, 173–193.
  • Suengas A. G., & Johnson M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental psychology: General, 117, 377–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.4.377
  • Takahashi M., & Shimiza H. (2007). Do you remember the day of your graduation ceremony from junior high school?: A factor structure of the Memory Characteristics Questionnaire. Japanese Psychological Research, 49, 275–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2007.00353.x
  • van de Vijver F. J. R., & Hambleton R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet