¿Es lo bello siempre tan bueno? Influencia del atractivo físico en la percepción social del acoso sexual

  1. Antonio Herrera
  2. M. Carmen Herrera
  3. Francisca Expósito
Journal:
International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

ISSN: 0213-4748,  1579-3680

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 31

Issue: 2

Pages: 238-253

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2016.1143179 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Research has shown that the perception of sexual harassment depends on factors such as gender, the situational context, the type of harassment, the ideology of the perceiver, the physical attractiveness of the harasser and victim and the relationship between them. This study focuses on examining the influence of physical attractiveness in the perception of a situation like sexual harassment. Through a questionnaire, 205 participants read a scenario in which a male worker (attractive vs. unattractive) engaged in gender harassment against a female colleague (attractive vs. unattractive). The participants then answered the measurements on the perception of harassment, responsibility, motivation and ideology. The main results were that the situation was more often perceived as sexual harassment when the victim of the harassment was physically attractive than when she was unattractive. Furthermore, the higher the participants’ acceptance of harassment myths the more they tended to blame the victim. We can conclude from this study the importance of the influence of certain myths or preconceived ideas about sexual harassment, which are found in both men and women, on how these situations are perceived

Bibliographic References

  • Agthe, M., Spörrle, M., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Does being attractive always help? Positive and negative effects of attractiveness on social decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1042–1054. doi:10.1177/0146167211410355
  • Angelone, D. J., Mitchell, D., & Carola, K. (2009). Tolerance of sexual harassment: A laboratory paradigm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 949–958. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9421-2
  • Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768
  • Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351879
  • Brand, R. J., Bonatsos, A., D’Orazio, R., & DeShong, H. (2012). What is beautiful is good, even online: Correlations between photo attractiveness and text attractiveness in men’s online dating profiles. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 166–170. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.023 Campbell, R., Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239–1259. doi:10.1177/088626001016012002
  • Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39–50.
  • Cleveland, J. N., & Kerst, M. E. (1993). Sexual harassment and perceptions of power: An underarticulated relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 49–67. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1993.1004
  • Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C. H. (1995). Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261
  • Diehl, C., Rees, J., & Bohner, G. (2012). Flirting with disaster: Short-term mating orientation and hostile sexism predict different types of sexual harassment. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 521–531. doi:10.1002/ab.21444 Influence of attractiveness on the perception of harassment / Influencia del atractivo en la percepción del acoso 251
  • Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
  • Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (E.E.O.C.). (2008). Sexual harassment [on-line]. Retrieved 4 September 2008 from: http://www.eeoc.gov/types/sexual_har assment.html
  • Expósito, F., Herrera, A., Valor-Segura, I., Herrera, M. C., & Lozano, L. M. (2014). Adaptación española de la Escala de Mitos hacia el Acoso Sexual de Illinois. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1–13.
  • Expósito, F., & Moya, M. (2005). Violencia de género. In F. Expósito & M. Moya (Eds.), Aplicando la psicología social (pp. 201–227). Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.
  • Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlatos. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159–169. doi:10.1174/021347498760350641
  • Fitzgerald, L. F. (1996). Sexual harassment: The definition and measurement of a construct. In M. Paludi (Ed.), Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the Ivory power (pp. 25–48). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.578
  • Freeman, J. (2011). Women in the workplace: Wages, respect, and equal rights. New York, NY: Rosen Publishing Group.
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
  • Golden, J. H., Johnson, C. A., & Lopez, R. A. (2002). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Exploring the effects of attractiveness on perception of harassment. Sex Roles, 45, 767–784. doi:10.1023/A:1015688303023
  • Herrera, A., Pina, A., Herrera, M. C., & Expósito, F. (2014). ¿Mito o realidad? Influencia de la ideología en la percepción social del acoso sexual. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 24, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.apj.2014.07.002
  • Herrera, A., Valor-Segura, I., & Expósito, F. (2012). Is miss sympathy a credible defendant alleging intimate partner violence in a trial for murder? The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 4, 99–196.
  • Herrera, M. C., Herrera, A., & Expósito, F. (2014). Stop Harassment! Men’s reactions to victims’ confrontation. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6, 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.06.006
  • Hersch, J. (2011). Compensating differentials for sexual harassment. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 101, 630–634. doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.630
  • Instituto de la Mujer. (2009). Violencia sexual y tráfico de seres humanos. Retrieved from: http://www.inmujer.es/estadisticas/consulta.do?metodo=buscar
  • Johnston, V. S., & Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 183–199. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90005-3
  • Lemay, E. P., Clark, M. S., & Greenberg, A. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 339–353. doi:10.1177/0146167209359700
  • Leskinen, E. A., Cortina, L. M., & Kabat, D. B. (2011). Gender harassment: Broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 25–39. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9241-5 252 A. Herrera et al.
  • Lonsway, K. A., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles, 58, 599–615. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9367-1
  • Lonsway, K. A., Paynich, R., & Hall, J. N. (2013). Sexual harassment in law enforcement: incidence, impact, and perception. Police Quarterly, 16, 177–210. doi:10.1177/1098611113475630
  • Moore, F. R., Filippou, D., & Perrett, D. I. (2011). Intelligence and attractiveness in the face: Beyond the attractiveness halo effect. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 205–217. doi:10.1556/jep.9.2011.3.2
  • Popovich, P., Gehaulf, D., Jelton, J., Everton, W., Godinho, R., Mastrangelo, P., & Somers, J. (1996). Physical attractiveness and sexual harassment: Does every picture tell a story or every story draw a picture? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 520–542. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb02729.x
  • Pryor, J. B., & Day, J. D. (1988). Interpretations of sexual harassment: An attributional analysis. Sex Roles, 18(7–8), 405–417. doi:10.1007/BF00288392
  • Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Salman, S., & Turgut, S. (2010). Predictors of Turkish women’s and men’s attitudes toward sexual harassment: Ambivalent sexism, and ambivalence toward men. Sex Roles, 63, 871–881. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9847-6
  • Samuels, H. (2003). Sexual harassment in the workplace: A feminist analysis of recent developments in the UK. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26, 467–482. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2003.08.004
  • Sheppard, L. D., Goffin, R. D., Lewis, R. J., & Olson, J. (2011). The effect of target attractiveness and rating method on the accuracy of trait ratings. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10, 24–33. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000030
  • Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2005). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687– 696. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
  • Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 410–414. doi:10.1037/h0076472
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290– 312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
  • Topa, G., Morales, J. F., & Depolo, M. (2008). Perceived sexual harassment at work: Meta analysis and structural model of antecedents and consequences. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 207–218. doi:10.1017/S113874160000425X
  • Wiener, R. L., Reiter-Palmon, R., Winter, R. J., Richter, E., Humke, A., & Maeder, E. (2010). Complainant behavioral tone, ambivalent sexism, and perceptions of sexual harassment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 56–84. doi:10.1037/a0018434
Data source: Dialnet