Eficacia de un curso en ple, multilingüe, para la enseñanza del ensayo científico

  1. Arroyo González, Rosario 1
  2. Jiménez Baena, Abraham 1
  3. Martínez Sánchez, Estefanía 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Journal:
Profesorado: Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado

ISSN: 1989-6395,  1138-414X

Year of publication: 2016

Issue Title: Colaboraciones

Volume: 20

Issue: 2

Pages: 400-422

Type: Article

DOI: 10.30827/PROFESORADO.V20I2.10426 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Profesorado: Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The aim of this research is to review a multilingual writing program of the scientific essay, accessible from PLE. For this purpose, a mixed design is appliedwhich, on the one hand, let us investigate the significant differences in the perception of writing self-efficacy and the students’ writing competence in English and Spanish; and on the other, it is a question of discovering if writing self-efficacy may establish a mutual relation with the knowledge of other writing competences. Likewise, it is analyzed which writing competences improve and which ones do not, in English and in Spanish. Finally, the use of resources and telematic applications in the process of learning of each student, which can have an influence on theprogram effects, are described.

Bibliographic References

  • Andrade, H.L., Wang, X., Du, Y &Akawi. R. L. (2009). Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment and SelfEfficacy for Writing.TheJournal of EducationalResearch, 102(4), 287-300.
  • Arroyo, R. (2009a). Escritura Multilingüe y Ciudadanía Digital. En J.A. Ortega; J.A. Fuentes; Y, Aragón., Mª.C. Robles [CD] Educación, Movilidad Virtual y Sociedad del conocimiento (pp.175-191). Granada: Nativola.
  • Arroyo, R. (2009b). Desarrollo Metacognitivo y Sociocultural de la Composición Escrita. Interculturalidad y Tecnologías en la enseñanza de la escritura multilingüe. Granada: Nativola.
  • Arroyo, R (2013). Descripción de procesos en la composición escrita de estudiantes universitarios para un desarrollo multilingüe y tecnológico. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31 (1), 167-184.
  • Arroyo, R. (2012). Gestión de Programas Interculturales. En M. Lorenzo y M. López (Coors.),Respuestas Emergentes desde la organización de instituciones educativas (pp:225-228). Granada: Universidad de Granada
  • Arroyo, R., Salvador, F., Gervilla, Mª., Caballero, J. & Calvo, J. (2010). La innovación docente como estrategia de formación del profesorado universitario para dar respuesta a los problemas multilingües a los que se han de enfrentar los futuros profesionales de las sociedades del conocimiento. En T. Susinos, (Coor.), Actas del Congreso Internacional La Educación Inclusiva hoy: escenarios y protagonistas y XXVII Jornadas Nacionales de Universidades y Educación Especial (pp.863-877). Santander: Universidad de Cantabria.
  • Arroyo, R. & Gutiérrez-Braojos, C. (2013). Operativización de procesos escritos multilingües. Manuscrito presentado para su publicación.
  • Bandura, A. (2003). Self-efficacy:Theexercice of control. New York: W.H Freeman
  • Bazerman, C. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of research on writing.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • De La Paz, S. &McCutchen, D. (2010). Learning to Write. In R.E. Mayer & P.A. Alexander (Eds.),Handbook of Research on Learnig and Instruction (pp:32-54). New York: Routledge.
  • Cabero, J. & Llorente, Mª.C. (2007). La interacción en el aprendizaje en red: uso de las herramientas, elementos de análisis y posibilidades educativas. RIED, 10 (2), 97-123.
  • Canagarajah, S., &Jerskey, M. (2009).Meeting the Needs of Advanced Multilingual Writers.En Beard, R., Myhill, D., Riley, J., &Nystrand, M. (Eds.),The Sage Handbook of Writing Development (pp.473-488).Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
  • Cleaveland, M.C.&Larkins, E.R. (2004). Web-based practice and feeback improve tax students´ written communication skills. Journal of Accounting Education, 22, 211-228. DOI:101016/j.jaccedu.2004.08.001.
  • Can, G. & Walker, A. (2011). A Model for Doctoral students´ perceptions and attitudes toward written feedback for academic writing.Research High Education, 52, 508-563.
  • Dysthe, O. (2007). How a Reform Affects Writing in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (2),237-252.
  • Erkan, D. Y. &Saban, A.I. (2011). Writing Performance Relative to Writing Apprehension, Self-Efficacy in Writing, and Attitudes towards Writing: A Correlational Study in Turkish Tertiary-Level EFL. Asian E.F.L Journal, 13(1), 164-192.
  • Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Faigley, L., Daly, J. & Witte, S. (1981). The role of writing apprehension in writing performance and competence.Journal of Educational Research, 75, 16-21.
  • Featonby, A. (2012). The Use of the "Teaching as Inquiry Model" to Develop Students' Self-Efficacy in Literature Response Essay Writing.Weavingeducationalthreads.Weavingeducationalpractice, 13, 24-35.
  • Fox, D, J. (1981). El proceso de investigación en educación. Pamplona: Eunsa.
  • García, J. N.& Raquel F. (2008). Cambios en la autoeficacia en escritura después de una intervención en estrategias cognitivas en estudiantes con dificultad de aprendizaje: el rol mediador del género en la calibración. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 414-432.
  • García, J.N.&Fidalgo, R. (2004).El papel del autoconocimiento de los procesos psicológicos de la escritura en la calidad de las composiciones escritas. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 57(3), 281-297.
  • Graham, S. & Harris, K.R (2005).Writing better.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  • Graham, S., Schwartz, S.S. & MacArthur, C.A. (1993). Knowledge of Writing and the Composing Process, Attitude Toward Writing, and Self-Efficacy for Students With and Without Learning Disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 26(4), 237-249.
  • Graham, S., Schwrtz, S.S. & MacArthur, C.A. (1993). Knowledge of Writing and the Composing Process, Attitude Toward Writing and Self-Efficacy for Students whit and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities,26 (4), 237-249.
  • Guastella, A.J. &Dadds, M.R. (2006). Cognitive-Behavioral Models of Emotional Writing: A Validation Study. Cognitive Therapy Research, 30, 397-414.
  • Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L.H. (2006). Improving the Writing, Knowledge and Motivation of Struggling Young Writers: Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development With and Without Peer Support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295-340.
  • Heidi, L.A., Xiaolei, W., Ying D., Akawi, R.L. (2009). Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment and SelfEfficacy for Writing.The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287-300.
  • Kemner, L.(2010).The Impact of Intrusive Advising on Academic Self Efficacy Beliefs in First-Year Students in Higher Education. Dissertations.Paper 151.Recuperado de: http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/151
  • Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G. &Van Den Bergh, H. (2006). Writing as a learning tool: Testing the role of students’ writing strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 21(1),17-34.
  • Martinez, C.T.,Kock, N.& Cass, J. (2011). Pain and pleasure in Short Essay Writing: Factors Predicting University Students´ Writing Anxiety and Writing Self-Efficacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54 (5), 351-360.
  • Mayoraga, M.J. & Ruiz Baeza, V.M. (2002).Muestreos utilizados en la investigación educativa en España. RevistaElectrónica de Investigación y EvaluaciónEducativa, 8(2), 1-8.
  • Nystrand, M. (2006).The social and historical context for writing research.In C.A. MacArthur., S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.),Handbook of Writing Research (pp.11-27). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Nussbaum, E.M.&Kardash, C.M. (2005).The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing.Journal of Educational Psychology, 97( 2), 157-16.
  • Page-Voth, V. & Graham, S. (1999). Effects of Goal Setting and Strategy Use on the Writing Performance and Self-Efficacy of Students With Writing and Learning Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 230-240.
  • Pajares, F. (2007).Sources of Writing Self-Efficacy Beliefs oof Elementary, Middle, and High Schools Students.Research in the Teaching of English.42(1), 104-120.
  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19,149-172.
  • Pajares, F. &Valiante, G. (1997).Influence of Self-Efficacy on Elementary Students´ Writing.The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 353-360.
  • Pajares, F. &Valiente, G. (2006). Seelf-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development.In C. A. MacArthur., S, Graham & J. Fitzgerald. (Eds.),Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 158-170). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Shell, D. F., Bruning, R.H. & Colvin, C. (1995). Self-Efficacy, Attribution, and Outcome Expectancy Mechanisms in Reading and Writing Achievement: Grade-Level and Achievement-Level Differences. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 87(3).
  • Salvador, F. (2005). Procesos cognitivos en la expresión escrita: Modelos teóricos e investigación empírica. En F. Salvador, (Ed.),La expresión escrita de alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales. Procesos cognitivos (pp.15-44). Archidona:Aljibe.
  • Salvador, F. y García A. (2005). Metodología de la Investigación. En F. Salvador, (Ed.),La expresión escrita de alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales. Procesos cognitivos(pp. 45-70). Archidona: Aljibe.
  • Song, Y. &Ferretti, R.P (2013).Teaching critical questions about argumentation through the revisig process: Effects of strategy instruction on college students´ argumentative essays.Reading and Writing, 26(1), 67-90.
  • Takao, A. Y. & Kelly, G.J. (2003).Assessment of Evidence in University Students´Scientific Writing.Science & Education, 12, 341-363.
  • Tashakkori, A. &Teddlie, C. (2003).Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Torrance, M.S., Thomas, G. V. & Robinson, E. J. (2000).Individual differences in undergraduate essaywriting strategies: A longitudinal study. Higher Education,39,181-200.
  • Torrance, M.S., Thomas, G. V. & Robinson, E. J. (2004). The writing strategies of gradúate researcher students in the social sciences. Higher Education, 27, 379-392.
  • Venables, A.& Summit, R. (2003).Enhancing Scientific Essay Writing Using Peer Assessment.Innovations in EducationandTeachingInternational, 40 (3), 281-290.
  • Walker, G.E., Golde, C.M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A.C., &Huntchings, P. (2008).The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA:Jossy-Bass.
Data source: Dialnet