Interpersonal effects of emotion in a multi-round Trust Game

  1. María I. Tortosa 1
  2. Tatiana Strizhko 1
  3. Mariagrazia Capizzi 1
  4. María Ruz 1
  1. 1 University of Granada (Spain)
Revista:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 34

Número: 2

Páginas: 179-198

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Resumen

Las emociones que otras personas expresan juegan un papel importante en las decisiones que tomamos en contextos sociales. Sin embargo, la mayoría de la investigación hasta la fecha se ha focalizado en la emoción subjetiva de la persona que toma la decisión, en vez de en la emoción mostrada por los compañeros en una interacción. Nuestro estudio se diseñó para explorar cómo las expresiones de felicidad y enfado de otras personas afectan a las respuestas de cooperación en un Juego de Confianza de interacciones múltiples. Los resultados muestran que los compañeros felices generan niveles de cooperación más altos que los enfadados, incluso después de interacciones repetidas en las que las emociones no predicen la tasa de cooperación de los compañeros. Dicho efecto desaparece cuando el significado social de las emociones se elimina del juego. Otro experimento adicional muestra que los participantes son capaces de aprender asociaciones específicas entre emociones discretas y diferentes tendencias cooperativas, aunque necesitan más evidencia cuando la asociación es contraria a las expectativas previas. En conjunto, nuestros resultados muestran que las emociones se emplean como señales en las interacciones entre personas, y que su efecto es duradero incluso en contextos en los que carecen de predictividad real.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adolphs, R. (2003) Cognitive neuroscience of human social behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165-178.
  • Aguiar, F., Branas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R., Jimenez, N., & Miller, L.M. (2009) Are women expected to be more generous? Experimental Economics, 12, 93-98.
  • Angie, A.D., Connelly, S., Waples, E.P., & Kligyte, V. (2011) The influence of discrete emotions on judgment and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Cognition & Emotion 15, 1-30.
  • Averbeck, B.B., & Duchaine, B. (2009) Integration of social and utilitarian factors in decision making. Emotion, 5, 599-608.
  • Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K.D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
  • Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142.
  • Boone, R. T., & Buck, R. (2003). Emotional expressivity and trustworthiness: The role of nonverbal behavior in the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 163-182.
  • Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Camerer, C. F., & Weigelt, K. (1988). Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica, 56, 1-36.
  • Camerer, C.F. (2003). Behavioural game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.
  • Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1611-1618.
  • Dunn, J.R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736-748.
  • Eckel, C.C., & Wilson, R.K. (2003). The human face of game theory: Trust and reciprocity in sequential games. In E. Ostrom & J. Walker (Eds.), Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research (pp. 245-274). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Fehr, E., & Camerer, C.F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 419-427.
  • Fridlund, A.J. (1995). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. London: AcademicPress.
  • Gaertig, C., Moser, A.R., Alguacil, S. & Ruz, M. (2012). Social information and economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, 6:103.
  • Harlé, K.M., & Sanfey, A.G. (2007). Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game. Emotion, 7, 876-881.
  • Jennings, J.R. and Wood, C.C. (1976). The adjustment procedurefor repeated-measures analyses of variance. Psychophysiology, 13, 277-278.
  • Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 505-521.
  • Kleinhesselink, R.R., & Edwards, R.E. (1975). Seeking and avoiding belief- discrepant information as a function of its perceived refutability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 787-790.
  • King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C.F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P.R. (2005). Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 78-83.
  • Krumhuber, E., Manstead, A.S., Cosker, D., Marshall, D., Rosin, P.L., & Kappas, A. (2007). Facial dynamics as indicators of trustworthiness and cooperative behavior. Emotion, 7, 730-735.
  • Niedenthal, P.M., Mermillod, M., Maringer, M., & Hess U. (2010). The simulation of smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 33, 417-433.
  • Olsson, A., & Ochsner, K.N. (2008). The role of social cognition in emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 65-71.
  • Parkinson, B., & Simons, G. (2009). Affecting others: social appraisal and emotion contagion in everyday decision-making. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1071-1084.
  • Ruz, M., & Tudela, P. (2011). Emotional conflict in interpersonal interactions. Neuroimage, 54, 1685-91.
  • Ruz, M., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (in press) Interactions between emotion and cognitive control in an interpersonal game. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
  • Ruz, M., Moser, A., & Webster, K. (2011) Social expectations bias decision-making in uncertain interpersonal situations. PLoS ONE 6(2): e15762. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015762.
  • Sanfey, A.G. (2007). Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science, 318, 598-602.
  • Scharlemann, J.P.W., Eckel, C.C., Kacelnik, A., & Wilson, R.K. (2001). The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 617-640.
  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime User's Guide. Pittsburg: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
  • Tice, D.M. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 711-725.
  • Tortosa, M., Lupiañez, J., & Ruz, M. (2013). Race, Emotion and Trust: an ERP study. Brain Research, 1494, 44-55.
  • Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J.W., Leon, A.C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T.A., Marcus, D.J., Westerlund, A., Casey, B.J., & Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242-249.
  • Van Kleef, G.A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184-188.
  • Van Kleef, G.A., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotions in social decision-making: The emotions as social information model. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42 (pp. 45-96). Burlington: Academic Press.
  • Wubben, M.J.J., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2009). How emotion communication guides reciprocity: Establishing cooperation through disappointment and anger Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 987-990.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet