Nuevas tendencias en la relación entre los grupos de interés y la sostenibilidad corporativa

  1. Javier Delgado-Ceballos 1
  2. José Domingo Bea-López 1
  3. Jenny María Ruiz-Jiménez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Empresa, medio ambiente y competición

Número: 401

Páginas: 63-68

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Economía industrial

Resumen

Este trabajo de revisión de la literatura tiene como objeti- vo aumentar el conocimiento sobre la relación entre los stakeholder y la sostenibilidad corporativa. Las tres temáti- cas más importantes encontradas son: la influencia de los grupos de interés en el impulso de la sostenibilidad corpo- rativa, la gestión de stakeholders, sostenibilidad corporati- va y desempeño financiero y, por último, el desarrollo de marcos conceptuales de la relación entre stakeholders y sostenibilidad corporativa.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BANSAL, P. (2005). «Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 26, pp.197-218.
  • BARNETT, M. L. (2007). «Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility». Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, pp. 794-816.
  • BASU, K. y PALAZZO, G. (2008). «Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking». Academy of Management Review, vol.33, pp.122-136.
  • BRIDOUX, F y STOELHORST, J.W. (2014). «Microfoun-dations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives». Strategic Management Journal, vol.35, pp.107-125.
  • BUNDY, J.; SHROPSHIRE, C. ,y BUCHHOLTZ, A.K. (2013). «Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns». Academy of Management review, vol. 38, nº 3, pp. 352-376.
  • BUYSSE, K y VERBEKE, A. (2003). «Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management pers-pective». Strategic Management Journal, vol.24, pp. 453-470.
  • CARROLL, A.B. (1979). «A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance». Academy of management review, vol. 4, pp. 497-505.
  • CASTELLÓ, I.; ETTER M. y NIELSEN, F. (2016). «Strategies of Legitimacy Through Social Media: The Networked Strategy». Journal of Management Studies. vol. 53, pp. 402-432.
  • DARNALL, N.; HENRIQUES, I. y SADORSKY, P. (2010). «Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size». Journal of Management Studies, vol. 47, nº 6, pp. 10721094.
  • DE LANGE, D.; D ARMANIOS, D.; DELGADO-CEBALLOS, J. y SANDHU, S. (2015). «From Foe to Friend Complex Mutual Adaptation of Multinational Corporations and Nongovernmental Organizations». Business & Society, 0007650314568537
  • DOH, J. P.; HOWTON, S.D. y HOWTON, S.W. (2010). «Does the Market Respond to an Endorsement of Social Responsibility?. The Role of Institutions, Information, and Legitimacy». Journal of Management, vol. 36, pp. 1461-1485.
  • ECCLES, R.G.; IOANNOU, I. y SERAFEIM, G. (2014). «The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organiza-tional Processes and Performance». Management Science, vol. 60, pp. 2835-2857.
  • FREEMAN, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman/Ballinger
  • FREEMAN, R.E.; WICKS, A.C. y PARMAR, B. (2004). «Stakeholder Theory and The Corporate Objective Re-visited». Organization Science, vol.15, nº 3, pp. 364-369.
  • FREEMAN, R.E.; HARRISON, J. S.; WICKS, A.C.; PARMAR, B. L.; y DE COLLE, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art Cambridge. University Press.
  • FROOMAN, J. (1999). «Stakeholder influence strategies». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 24, nº 2, pp. 191-205.
  • GLADWIN, T.N.; KENNELLY, J.J., y KRAUSE, T. (1995). «Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research». Academy of Management review, vol. 20, nº 4 pp. 874-907.
  • GODFREY, P.C.; MERRILL, C.B. y HANSEN, J.M. (2009). «The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 30, nº 4, pp. 425-445.
  • HARRISON, J.S.; BOSSE, D.A. y PHILLIPS, R.A. (2010). «Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage». Strategic Management Journal, vol.31, pp. 58-74.
  • HART, S. L. y DOWELL, G. (2011). «Invited editorial: A naturalresource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after». Journal of Management, vol. 37, nº 5, pp. 1464-1479.
  • HÖRISCH, J.; FREEMAN, R.E., y SCHALTEGGER, S. (2014). «Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework». Organization y Environment, vol. 27, pp. 328-346.
  • KASSINIS, G. y VAFEAS, N. (2006). «Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, pp. 145-159.
  • MADSEN, P.M. y RODGERS, Z.J. (2015). «Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 36, pp. 776-794.
  • MONTIEL, I. (2008). «Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability separate pasts, common futures». Organization y Environment, vol. 21, nº 3,pp. 245-269.
  • MONTIEL, I. y DELGADO-CEBALLOS, J. (2014). «Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet?». Organization y Environment, vol. 27,nº 2, pp .113-139.
  • RAMCHANDER S.; SCHWEBACH R.G. y STAKING, K. (2012). «The informational relevance of corporate social responsibility: evidence from DS400 index reconstitutions». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, nº 3, pp. 303-314.
  • SCHERER, A.G.; PALAZZO, G. y SEIDL, D. (2013). «Ma-naging Legitimacy in Complex and Heteroge-neous Environments: Sustainable Development in a Globalized World». Journal of Management Studies, vol. 50, nº 2, pp. 259-284.
  • SHARMA, S. y HENRIQUES, I. (2005). «Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry». Strategic Management Journal, vol.26, nº 2, pp. 159-180.
  • SURROCA, J.; TRIBÓ, J.A., y ZAHRA, S.A. (2013). «Stake-holder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries». Academy of Management journal, vol. 56, nº 2, pp. 549-572.
  • TANTALO, C. y PRIEM, R.L. (2016). «Value creation through stakeholder synergy». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 37, nº 2, pp. 314-329.
  • WANG, H.; CHOI, J., Y LI, J. (2008). “Too little or too much? untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance”. Organization science, vol.19, núm.1, pp.143-159.
  • WANG, H., Y QIAN, C. (2011). «Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access». Academy of Management journal, vol.54, núm.6, pp.1159-1182.
  • WCED, U. (1987). Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development Oxford University Press.
  • ZHAO, M., PARK, S. H., ZHOU, N. (2014). «MNC strategy and social adaptation in emerging markets». Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 45, nº 7, pp. 842-861.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet