La economía política institucionalbalance y perspectivas

  1. García Quero, Fernando 1
  2. López Castellano, Fernando 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought

ISSN: 2386-5768

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 3

Número: 2

Páginas: 188-200

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/IJHE.54625 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought

Resumen

Los recientes debates sobre el papel de las instituciones en el desarrollo han mostrado la existencia de dos grandes corrientes teóricas en lo que al pensamiento institucionalista se refiere: la “Nueva Economía Institucional” y la “Economía Política Institucionalista”. La primera, encabezada por premios Nobel de Economía como Ronald Coase, Douglass North, Oliver Williamson y Elinor Ostrom, ha sido ampliamente analizada y documentada. En cuanto a la Economía Política Institucionalista, aún puede apreciarse un vacío importante de contribuciones académicas que analicen sus raíces y sus principales aportaciones. El presente artículo trata de superar, en parte, esta laguna mostrando las aportaciones principales de la que, a juicio de algunos autores, puede considerarse como la única corriente “explícitamente institucionalista”, la Economía Política Institucional (EPI), que se sitúa en torno a la obra de Ha-Joon Chang. El objetivo del trabajo es doble: ofrecer una aproximación a la EPI y realizar una propuesta de clasificación de las instituciones a partir de las contribuciones de sus principales autores.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albert, Michel.1991. Capitalism vs. Capitalism. New York, Four Walls Eight Windows. Alt, JamenyShepsle, Kenneth.(eds.) 1990.Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Bardhan, Pranab.2001. Deliberative Conflicts, Collective Action and Institutional Economics. En Meier, G. and Stiglitz, J. (eds.),Frontiers of Development Economics: the Future in Perspective. New York, Oxford University Press, 269-290.
  • Berger, Suzanney Dore, Ronald P. 1996. -ational Diversity and Global Capitalism. New York, Cornell University Press.
  • Block, Fred. 2000. Deconstructing capitalism as a system. Rethinking Marxism, 12 (3), 83-98.
  • Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1986. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742.
  • Bronfenbrenner, Urie and Morris, Pamela. 1998. The ecology of developmental processes. En Damon,W. yLerner,R.M. (eds.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 1, 993-1023. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Buchanan, James. 1986. Liberty, Market and State. Brighton, Wheatsheaf Books Ltd. Burlamaqui, Leonardo; Castro, Ana Celiay Chang Ha-Joon. (ed) (2000). Institutions and the role of State.Chentelham, Edward Elgar.
  • Burton, John. 1983. Picking Losers…?:The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. London, Institute of Economic Affairs.
  • Case, Robbiey Okamoto, Yukari.1996. The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 246(6), 1-26
  • Case, Robbiey Okamoto, Yukari.Chang, Ha-Joon. 1994a. State, Institutions, and Structural Change, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2), 293-313.
  • Case, Robbiey Okamoto, Yukari.Chang, Ha-Joon. 1994b. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. London and Basingstoke, Macmillan.
  • Case, Robbiey Okamoto, Yukari.Chang, Ha-Joon. 2000. An Institutionalist Perspective on the Role of the State –Towards an Institutionalist Political Economy.En Burlamaqui, L.;Castro,A. y Chang,H-J. (eds.), Institutions and the Role of the State, 3-26. Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
  • Case, Robbiey Okamoto, Yukari.Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002a. Breaking the Mould –An Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to the Neo-Liberal Theory of the Market and the State.Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(5), 539– 559.
  • Case, Robbiey Okamoto, Yukari.Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002b. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. London, Anthem Press.
  • Case, Robbiey Okamoto, Yukari.Chang, Ha-Joon. 2005. Globalization, Global Standards and the Future of East Asia. Global Economic Review, 34(4), 363–378.
  • Case, Robbiey Okamoto, Yukari.Chang, Ha-Joon. 2011. Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 473-498.
  • Chang, Ha-Joon. (ed.). 2007. Institutional Change and Economic Development. London, Anthems Press.
  • Chang, Ha-Joony Evans, Peter.2005. The Role of Institutions in Economic Change. EnDymski Gary y Da Paula,Silvina(eds.), Reimagining Growth. London, Zed Press, 99-129.
  • Chang, Ha-Joony Rowthorn, Robert.1995. Role of the State in Economic Change – Entrepreneurshipand Conflict Management. En Chang,H.-J.y Rowthorn,R. (eds.), The Role of the State in Economic Change. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 31-50.
  • Di John, Johnathan. 2004. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Venezuela, 1920-1998. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Economics University of Cambridge.
  • Ellerman, David. 1999. Helping Others to Help Themselves: The Challenge of Autonomy- Compatible Development Assistance.Washington DC, World Bank.
  • Epstein, Gerald. 2006. Central Banks as Agents of Economic Development. WIDER Research Papar, 2006-54. Helsinki, UNU-WIDER.
  • Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Evans, Peter. 2007. Extending the institutional turn: property, politics, and development trajectories. In Chang, Ha-Joon (ed.),Institutional Change and Economic Development. London, Anthems Press, 35-52.
  • Flavell, John H. 1992. Cognitive Development: Past, Present and Future. Developmental Psychology, 28 (2), 191-204.
  • Frey, Bruno. 1997.-ot Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Galbraith, James K. 1955. The affluent society.Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
  • Galbraith, James K. 1967. The new industrial State.Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
  • Galbraith, James K. 1987. A history of economics: The past as the present. London, H. Hamilton.
  • García-Quero, Fernando.2013. Desarrollo y economía política institucionalista: una reinterpretación del comportamiento, el estado, la política y el cambio institucional. Tesis doctoral. Granada, Editorial Universidad de Granada.
  • García-Quero, Fernandoy López Castellano, Fernando. (2011). Other institutionalism for Development Studies, Real-world Economics Review, 58(12), 126-133.
  • Greif, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the path to modern economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Hayek, Friedrich. 1949. Individualism and Economic Order. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1988. Economics and Institutions: a manifesto for a modern institutional economics. Cambridge, Policy Press.
  • Hayek, Friedrich. 1993. Economics and Evolution. Cambridge, Policy Press.
  • Hayek, Friedrich. 1998. The Approach of Institutional Economics,Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 166- 92.
  • Hayek, Friedrich. 2001. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London, Routledge.
  • Hayek, Friedrich. 2004a. The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London, Routledge.
  • Hayek, Friedrich. 2004b. Darwinism, causality and the social sciences, Journal of Economic Methodology, 2(2), 175-194.
  • Hayek, Friedrich. 2006. What are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25.
  • Hayek, Friedrich. 2007. The Revival of Veblenian Institutional Economics, Journal of Economic Issues; 41(2), 325-340.
  • Hodgson, Geoffrey. y Knudsen, Thorbjørn. 2004. The Complex Evolution of a simple Traffic convention: the functions and implications of habit, Journal of Economics Behaviour and Organizations, 54(1), 19-47
  • Kapp, K.William. 1968. In Defense of Institutionalism. Swedish Journal of Economics, 70(1), 1-18.
  • Lazonick, William. 2006. Corporate Governance, Innovate Enterprise, and Economic Development, WIDER Research Paper 2006-71, Helsinki, UNU-WIDER.
  • Lazonick, William. 1991. Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge, Nueva York, University Press.
  • Lewis, OrionySteinmo, Sven. 2011. Tomemos en serio la evolución: Análisis institucional y teoría evolutiva. Revista de Economía Institucional, 13(24), 111–151.
  • List, Friedrich.1885 [1841]. The -ational System of Political Economy. London, Green and Company.
  • López Castellano, Fernando y García-Quero, Fernando 2012. Institutional approaches to economic development: The current status of the debate, Journal of Economic Issues, 46(4), 921-940.
  • López Castellano, Fernando y García-Quero, Fernando 2013. Instituciones y desarrollo: perspectivas desde la heterodoxia. En Arias, X. C. y Caballero, G. (eds.), -uevo institucionalismo: gobernanza, economía y políticas públicas, 81-102. Madrid, CIS-Centro de InvestigacionesSociológicas.
  • Mayhew, Anne. 1989. Contrasting origins of the two institutionalisms: the social science context. Review of Political Economy, 1(3), 319-333.
  • March, Jamesy Olsen, Johan.1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York, The Free Press.
  • Mantzavinos, Chrysostomoa; North, Douglass y Shariq, Syed.2004. Learning, institutions and economic performance. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 75-84
  • North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional change and Economic Performance. New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • North, Douglass. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Olson, Mancur. 1996. Big bills left on the sidewalk: why some nations are rich and others poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2), 3-24.
  • Parke, Ross; Ornstein, Peter;Riesesm, Johny Zahn-Waxler, Carolyn.1994A Century on Development Psychology. Washington DC, American Psychological Association.
  • Piaget, Jean. 1977. The development of thought: equilibration of cognitive structures. California, Viking Press University of California.
  • Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston, Massachusetts, Beacon Press.
  • Reinert, Erik. 1995. Competitiveness and its predecessors: a 500 years Cross national Perspective. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(1), 23-42.
  • Reinert, Erik. 2004. Globalization, Economic Development and Inequality: An alternative Perspective. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Reinert, Erik. 2006. Institutionalism Ancient, Old and New: A Historical Perspective on Institutions and Uneven Development. World Institute for Economic Development Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nation University, Research Paper 2006/77.
  • Reinert, Erik. 2007. How Rich Countries Got Rich … and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London, Constable & Robinson.
  • Rutherford, Malcolm. 1994. Institutions in Economics–the old and the new institutionalism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmoller, Gustav. 1910 [1884].The journal Schmoller´sJahrbuch.The Mercantile System and its Historical Significance.Nueva York, Mamillan.
  • Simon, Herbert. 1983. Reasons in Human Behaviour. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  • Sperry, Roger W. 1991. In Defense of Mentalism and Emergent Interaction. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 12(2), 221–46.
  • Toboso, Fernando. 1997. ¿En qué se diferencian los Enfoques de Análisis de la vieja y la nueva Economía Institucional? Hacienda Pública Española, 143, 175-192.
  • Veblen, Thorstein. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. An Economic Study in the evolution of Institutions. New York, Mcmillan Company.
  • Veblen, Thorstein. 1914. The instinct of Workmanship, and the State of the industrial Art. New York, Mcmicllan Vira, Bhaskar. 1997. The political Coase theorem: Identifying differences between neoclassical and critical institutionalism, Journal of Economic Issues, 31(3), 761-780.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. 2000. The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595-613.
  • Woo-Cumings, Meredith J. 1999. The Developmental State. New York, Cornell University Press
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet