Do potential past and future events activate the left-right mental timeline?

  1. Roberto Aguirre 1
  2. Julio Santiago 2
  1. 1 Universidad de la República de Uruguay
  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Journal:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 38

Issue: 2

Pages: 231-255

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Abstract

Current evidence provides support for the idea that time is mentally represented by spatial means, i.e., a left-right mental timeline. However, available studies have tested only factual events, i.e., those which have occurred in the past or can be predicted to occur in the future. In the present study we tested whether past and future potential events are also represented along the left-right mental timeline. In Experiment 1 participants categorized the temporal reference (past or future) of either real or potential events and responded by means of a lateralized (left or right) keypress. Factual events showed a space-time congruency effect that replicated prior findings: Participants were faster to categorize past events with the left hand and future events with the right hand than when using the opposite mapping. Crucially, this also ocurred for potential events. Experiment 2 replicated this finding using blocks of trials comprising only potential events. In order to assess the degree of automaticity of the activation of the mental timeline in these two kinds of events, Experiment 3 asked participants to judge whether the expressions referred to factual or potential events. In this case, there was no space-time congruency effect, showing that the lateralized timeline is active only when relevant to the task. Moreover, participants were faster to categorize potential events with the left hand and real events with the right hand than when using the opposite mapping, suggesting for the first time a link between the mental representations of lateral space and potentiality

Bibliographic References

  • Barsalou, L.W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513-562
  • Baumeister, R.F., & Masicampo, E.J. (2010). Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal-culture interface. Psychological Review, 117, 945-971. doi:10.1037/a0019393
  • Bonato, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2012). When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2257-2273. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007
  • Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. (2014). Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 473-479. doi: 10.1037/a0033297
  • Chang, S., & Cho, Y.S. (2015). Polarity correspondence effect between loudness and lateralized response set. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00683
  • Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42-45. doi.10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
  • Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371. doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
  • De Vega, M., & Urrutia, M. (2012). Discourse updating after reading a counterfactual event. Psicológica, 33(2), 157-173
  • De Vega, M., De León, I., Hernández, J. A., Valdés, M., Padrón, I., & Ferstl, E. C. (2014). Action sentences activate sensory motor regions in the brain independently of their status of reality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1363-1376. doi:10.1162/jocn
  • Fattorini, E., Pinto, M., Rotondaro, F., & Doricchi, F. (2015). Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention. Cortex, 73, 298-316. doi.org.proxy.timbo.org.uy:443/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.007
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
  • Ferguson, H. J., Fresh, M., & Leblond, J. (2013). Examining mental simulations of uncertain events. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 391-399. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0348-1
  • Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555-556. doi.10.1038/nn1066
  • Flumini, A., & Santiago, J. (2013). Time (also) flies from left to right… if it is needed! In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachmuz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Mental timeline for potential events 251 Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2315-2320). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430-1451. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01105.x
  • Gilead, M., Liberman, N., & Maril, A. (2012). Construing counterreal worlds: The role of abstraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 391-397. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1862
  • Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 280-285. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.001
  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71-115.
  • Kaup, B., Yaxley, R.H., Madden, C.J., Zwaan, R.A., & Lüdtke, J. (2007). Experiential simulations of negated text information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 976-990. doi:10.1080/17470210600823512
  • Lakens, D. (2012). Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: Structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 726-736. doi:10.1037/a0024955
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Núñez, R.E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401-450. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
  • Orenes, I., Beltrán, D., & Santamaría, C. (2014). How negation is understood: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 36-45. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.001
  • Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Israeli, Z., & Gabay, S. (2010). Is the future the right time? Experimental Psychology, 57, 308-314. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000036
  • Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1985). De la lógica del niño a la lógica del adolescente. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.
  • Proctor, R.W., & Cho, Y.S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416-442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532. doi: 0.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
  • Ruiz Campillo, J.P. (2014). La lógica del espacio. Un mapa operativo del sistema verbal del español. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 1:1, 62-85, doi:10.1080/23247797.2014.898518
  • Santiago, J., & Lakens, D. (2015). Can conceptual congruency effects between number, time, and space be accounted for by polarity correspondence? Acta Psychologica, 156, 179-191. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.016
  • Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M.J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 512-516. doi: 10.3758/bf03194099
  • Santiago, J., Román, A., Ouellet, M., Rodríguez, N., & Pérez-Azor, P. (2010). In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research, 74, 59-70. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0220-0
  • Schlemenson, S. (2004). Subjetividad y lenguaje en la clińica psicopedagógica. Voces presentes y pasadas. Buenos Aires. Paidoś.
  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
  • Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745-757. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67
  • Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515-557. doi: 0010-0285/9
  • Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117, 126-138. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.001
  • Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 426-430. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.426
Data source: Dialnet