Spanish researchers’ opinions, attitudes and practices towards open access publishing

  1. Sergio Ruiz-Pérez 1
  2. Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar 2
  1. 1 European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2017

Título del ejemplar: Comunicación política I

Volumen: 26

Número: 4

Páginas: 722-734

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2017.JUL.16 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Resumen

El movimiento de acceso abierto (open access en inglés, OA) ha explosionado en los últimos años. En 2016 invitamos a 1.896 investigadores de instituciones españolas a rellenar una encuesta sobre su opinión, actitudes y prácticas con respecto al OA. Analizamos las 554 respuestas recibidas de investigadores en todas las áreas del conocimiento (ratio de respuesta del 29%). La mayoría de los investigadores (86%) conocen revistas en OA en su campo y creen que el OA es beneficioso para su disciplina (76%). Sin embargo no se posicionan claramente con respecto a la calidad de dichas revistas, aunque se observan diferencias entre disciplinas. Casi el 70% de los investigadores han publicado al menos un artículo en OA en los últimos 5 años. La mitad de ellos tuvo que pagar tasas para publicar que fueron cubiertas con fondos de investigación.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alemayehu, Muluken-Wubayehu (2010). Researchers’ attitude to using institutional repositories: a case study of the Oslo University Institutional Repository (DUO). Master thesis. Oslo University College. https://goo.gl/Zoy7mV
  • Austin, Anthony; Heffernan, Maree; David, Nikki (2008). Academic authorship, publishing agreements and open access: Survey results. Open acces to knowledge (OAK) law project. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/13623/1/13623_3.pdf
  • De-Beer, Jennifer-Anne (2005). Open access scholarly communication in South Africa: Current status, significance, and the role for National Information Policy in the National System of Innovation. Master of Philosophy thesis. University of Stellenbosch. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/5976/ DeBeerJenniferMThesisFinal-pdfimproved.pdf
  • Bernal, Isabel (2010). Perceptions and participation in the open access movement at CSIC: Report of Digital.CSIC survey to researchers. Madrid: Digital.CSIC.
  • Björk, Bo-Christer; Solomon, David (2014). Developing an effective market for open access article processing charges. Final report, 71 pp. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/developingeffective-market-for-open-access-article-processing-chargesmar14.pdf https://doi.org/doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.951966
  • BOAI (2002). Budapest open access initiative. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
  • Bongiovani, Paola; Gómez, Nancy-Diana; Miguel, Sandra (2012). “Opiniones y hábitos de publicación en acceso abierto de los investigadores argentinos. Un estudio basado en los datos de la encuesta SOAP”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 35, n. 3, pp. 453-467. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.3.903
  • Borrego, Ángel (2016). “Measuring compliance with a Spanish Government open access mandate”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 4, pp. 757-764. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23422
  • Brown, Sheridan; Swan, Alma (2007). Researchers’ use of academic libraries and their services: A report commissioned by the Research Information Network and the Consortium of Research Libraries. Research Information Network; Consortium of Research Libraries. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/263868
  • Budden, Yvonne C. (2011). Report on the “Unlocking attitudes to open access” survey, May-July 2011. Coventry: University of Warwick. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/37817
  • Coonin, Bryna; Younce, Leigh (2009). “Publishing in open access journals in the social sciences and humanities: Who’s doing it and why”. In: ACRL 14th national conference, pp. 85-94. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/ conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/seattle/papers/85. pdf
  • Cozzarelli, Nicholas R.; Fulton, Kenneth R.; Sullenberger, Diane M. (2004). “Results of a PNAS author survey on an open access option for publication”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1111. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307315101
  • Creaser, Claire (2010). “Open access to research outputs — institutional policies and researchers’ views: Results from two complementary surveys”. New review of academic librarianship, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 4-25. https://goo.gl/Q37yRh https://doi.org/10.1080/13614530903162854
  • Dallmeier-Tiessen, Suenje; Darby, Robert; Goerner, Bettina; Hyppoelae, Jenni; Igo-Kemenes, Peter; Kahn, Deborah; Lambert, Simon; Lengenfelder, Anja; Leonard, Chris; Mele, Salvatore; Nowicka, Malgorzata; Polydoratou, Panayiota; Ross, David; Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio; Schimmer, Ralf; Swaisland, Mark; Van-der-Stelt, Wim (2011a). Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What scientists think about open access publishing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5260
  • Dallmeier-Tiessen, Suenje; Darby, Robert; Goerner, Bettina; Hyppoelae, Jenni; Igo-Kemenes, Peter; Kahn, Deborah; Lambert, Simon; Lengenfelder, Anja; Leonard, Chris; Mele, Salvatore; Nowicka, Malgorzata; Polydoratou, Panayiota; Ross, David; Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio; Schimmer, Ralf; Swaisland, Mark; Van-der-Stelt, Wim (2011b). “Open access journals What publishers offer, what researchers want”. Information services and use, v. 31, n. 1-2, pp. 85-91. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2011-0624
  • Dallmeier-Tiessen, Suenje; Goerner, Bettina; Darby, Robert; Hyppoelae, Jenni; Igo-Kemenes, Peter; Kahn, Deborah; Lambert, Simon; Lengenfelder, Anja; Leonard, Chris; Mele, Salvatore; Nowicka, Malgorzata; Polydoratou, Panayiota; Ross, David; Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio; Schimmer, Ralf; Swaisland, Mark; Van-der-Stelt, Wim (2011c). “Open access oublishing today”. In: SOAP symposium, Berlin, 13-01. http://edoc.mpg.de/524968
  • Deoghuria, Swapan; Roy, Satyabrata (2007). “Open access: What scientists think? a survey of researchers’ attitude towards open access”. In: ICSD-2007, pp. 568-577. http://arxiv.iacs.res.in:8080/jspui/handle/10821/165
  • Eger, Thomas; Scheufen, Marc; Meierrieks, Daniel (2013). The Determinants of Open Access Publishing: Survey Evidence from Germany https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2232675
  • Eger, Thomas; Scheufen, Marc; Meierrieks, Daniel (2014). “The determinants of open access publishing: Survey evidence from countries in the Mediterranean open access network (MedOANet)”. SSRN electronic journal, June 22, 30 pp. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2457550
  • Frass, Will; Cross, Jo; Gardner, Victoria (2013). Open access survey: Exploring the views of Taylor & Francis and Routledge authors. Taylor Francis Group, 47 pp. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pdf/open-access-surveymarch2013.pdf
  • Frass, Will; Cross, Jo; Gardner, Victoria (2014). Open access survey. Taylor & Francis http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/open-accesssurvey-june2014.pdf
  • Harjuniemi, Marja-Leena; Lehto, Sinikka (2012). Open access survey The summary: Survey of academic attitudes towards open access and institutional repositories. Jyväskylä University Library. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/37729
  • Harnad, Stevan (1990). “Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry”. Psychological science, v. 1, n. 6, pp. 342-344. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990. tb00234.x
  • Hernández-Borges, Ángel A.; Cabrera-Rodríguez, Raúl; Montesdeoca-Melián, Abián; Martínez-Pineda, Begoña; Torres-Álvarez-de-Arcaya, María-Luisa; Jiménez-Sosa, Alejandro (2006). “Awareness and attitude of Spanish medical authors to open access publishing and the ‚author pays’ model”. Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA), v. 94, n. 4, pp. 449-451, e218. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1629440
  • Hess, Thomas; Wigand, Rolf T.; Mann, Florian; Von-Walter, Benedikt (2007). Open access & science publishing Results of a study on researchers’ acceptance and use of open access publishing. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (Germany); University of Arkansas at Little Rock (EUA). https://www.econbiz.de/archiv1/2010/101264_open_ access_publishing.pdf
  • Kennan, Mary-Anne (2007). “Academic authors, scholarly publishing, and open access in Australia”. Learned publishing, v. 20, n. 2, pp. 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1087/174148507X185117
  • King, C. Judson; Harley, Diane; Earl-Novell, Sarah; Arter, Jennifer; Lawrence, Shannon; Perciali, Irene (2006). Scholarly communication: Academic values and sustainable models. Center for studies in higher education. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4j89c3f7
  • Laakso, Mikael; Björk, Bo-Christer (2016). “Hybrid open access. A longitudinal study”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 4, pp. 919-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.08.002
  • Laakso, Mikael; Welling, Patrik; Bukvova, Helena; Nyman, Linus; Björk, Bo-Christer; Hedlund, Turid (2011). “The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009”. PLoS one, 2011, v. 6, n. 6, p. e20961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
  • Liu, Mingnan; Kuriakose, Noble; Cohen, Jon; Cho, Sarah (2016). “Impact of web survey invitation design on survey participation, respondents, and survey responses”. Social science computer review, v. 34, n. 5, pp. 631-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315605606
  • Nariani, Rajiv; Fernández, Leila (2012). “Open access publishing: What authors want”. College & research libraries, v. 73, n. 2, pp. 182-195. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-203
  • Nature Publishing Group (2015a). “Author insights 2014 survey”. Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1204999.v4
  • Nature Publishing Group (2015b). “Author insights 2015 survey”. Nature Research. https://figshare.com/articles/Author_Insights_2015_ survey/1425362
  • Nature Publishing Group (2016). “Author insights 2016 survey”. Nature Research. https://figshare.com/articles/Open_Data_Survey/4010541
  • Nicholas, David; Huntington, Paul; Rowlands, Ian (2005). “Open access journal publishing: The views of some of the world’s senior authors”. Journal of documentation, v. 61, n. 4, pp. 497-519. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510607499
  • Nicholas, David; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena (2017a). “Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices”. Learned publishing, n. March, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102
  • Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena; Herman, Eti (2017b). “Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1098
  • Odell, Jere; Dill, Emily; Palmer, Kristi (2014). “Open access policies: A survey of Iupui faculty attitudes”. In: Iupui University Library and DLIS Joint conference on research scholarship and practice 2014. Indianapolis. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/5933
  • Over, Albert; Maiworm, Friedhelm; Schelewsky, André (2005). Publication strategies in transformation? Results of a study on publishing habits and information acquisition with regard to open access. Bonn: DFG. ISBN: 978 3 527317080 http://www.dfg.de/en/dfg_profile/facts_figures/evaluation_ studies_monitoring/studies/study_publication_strategies
  • Rowlands, Ian; Nicholas, David (2005). New journal publishing models: An international survey of senior researchers. Ciber. https://goo.gl/Uni1ii
  • Rowlands, Ian; Nicholas, David; Huntington, Paul (2004). “Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want?”. Learned publishing, v. 17, n. 4, pp. 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1087/0953151042321680
  • Rowley, Jennifer; Johnson, Frances; Sbaffi, Laura; Frass, Will; Devine, Elaine (2017). “Academics’ behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 5, pp. 1201-1211. https://goo.gl/RMLfpx https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23710
  • Sánchez-Tarragó, Nancy; Fernández-Molina, Carlos (2008). “Conocimientos y actitudes de los investigadores cubanos de la salud hacia las revistas de acceso abierto”. Acimed, v. 17, n. 3, pp. 0-0. https://goo.gl/MvLucN
  • Schöpfel, Joachim; Ferrant, Coline; André, Francis; Fabre, Renaud (2016). “Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS)”. Interlending & document supply, v. 44, n. 4, pp. 141-149. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01399422 https://doi.org/10.1108/ILDS-06-2016-0023
  • Schroter, Sara; Tite, Leanne; Smith, Richard (2005). “Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors”. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), v. 330, n. 7494, p. 756. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82
  • Shamash, Katie (2016). Article processing charges (APCs) and subscriptions: Monitoring open access costs. JISC. https://goo.gl/33gWGv
  • Singson, Mangkhollen; Joy, M. Gnanaselvi; Thiyagarajan, Senthilvelan; Dkhar, Valerie (2015). “Perceptions of open access publishing by Faculty at Pondicherry University: A survey”. International information & library review, v. 47, n. 1-2, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2015.1021625
  • Solomon, David J.; Björk, Bo-Christer (2012). “Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 1, pp. 98-107. http://www.openaccesspublishing.org/apc/preprint.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21660
  • Stone, Graham (2013). Raport on the university repository survey, October-November 2010. University of Huddesrsfield. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/9257
  • Suber, Peter (2012). Open access. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262517638
  • Swan, Alma; Brown, Sheridan (2003). “Authors and electronic publishing: What authors want from the new technology”. Learned publishing, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103320995069
  • Swan, Alma; Brown, Sheridan (2004a). “Authors and open access publishing”. Learned publishing, v. 17, n. 3, pp. 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315104323159649
  • Swan, Alma; Brown, Sheridan (2004b). JISC/OSI Journal authors survey. Report. Key perspectives. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/261002/1/JISCOAreport1.pdf
  • Swan, Alma; Brown, Sheridan (2005). Open access self-archiving: An author study. Key perspectives. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/260999
  • Teplitzky, Samantha; Phillips, Margaret (2016). “Evaluating the impact of open access at Berkeley: Results from the 2015 survey of Berkeley research impact initiative (BRII) funding recipients”. College & research libraries, v. 77, n. 5, pp. 568-581. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.568
  • University of California (2007). Faculty attitudes and behaviors regarding scholarly communication: Survey findings from the University of California. University of California Office of Scholarly Communication. http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/userresearch/surveys/2007_ CDL_OSC_Survey.pdf
  • White, Richard; Remy, Melanie (2016). University of Otago open access publishing survey results. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/6947
  • Xia, Jingfeng (2010). “A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open-access journal publishing”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 3, pp. 615-624. https://goo.gl/ZLYKCU https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21283
  • Zhu, Yimei (2017). “Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice”. Scientometrics, v. 111, n. 2, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet