Meta-ranking de universidadesposicionamiento de las universidades españolas

  1. Teodoro Luque-Martínez 1
  2. Nina Faraoni 1
  3. Luis Doña-Toledo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada, España
Journal:
Revista española de documentación científica

ISSN: 0210-0614,  1988-4621

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 41

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3989/REDC.2018.1.1456 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista española de documentación científica

Abstract

This study proposes the elaboration of a meta-ranking, including the 14 Spanish universities which appear in at least four of the five global rankings considered in this study, that are some of the world’s most influential. It is necessary to differentiate between research rakings that use bibliometric data and rankings that take into account other aspects and other forms of data collection, basically based on surveys. Spanish universities attain better positions in the first group. The investigation highlighted that the higher weaknesses we can find are in the internationalization, the reputation or in the student-teacher ratio. The one exception is for universities that stand out in the two dimensions. Regarding the outcome, there is an evident need for a greater internationalisation, to improve the reputation of the higher education institutions and to enhance the international visibility of the Spanish universities.

Bibliographic References

  • Aghion, P.; Dewatripont, M.; Hoxby, C.; Mas-Colell, A.; Sapir, A. (2010). The governance and performance of universities: Evidence from Europe and the US. Economic Policy, 25 (61), 7–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2009.00238.x
  • Altbach, P. (2015). The dilemmas of ranking. International Higher Education, 42. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2006.42.7878
  • Alves, H. (2011). The measurement of perceived value in higher education: a unidimensional approach. The Service Industries Journal, 31 (12), 1943-1960. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2011.550042
  • Alves, H.; Raposo, M. (2010). The influence of university image on student behaviour. International Journal of Educational Management, 24 (1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011013060
  • Brown, R. M.; Mazzarol, T. W. (2009). The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education. Higher Education, 58 (1), 81- 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9183-8
  • Buela-Casal, G.; Gutiérrez-Martínez, O.; Bermúdez-Sánchez, M. P.; Vadillo-Mu-oz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71 (3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8
  • Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2012). Cómo se cocinan los rankings universitarios. How to cook the university rankings. Dendra médica, 11 (1), 43-58.
  • Docampo, D. (2008). Rankings internacionales y calidad de los sistemas universitarios. Revista de Educación, (1), 149-176.
  • Docampo, D. (2010). On using the Shanghai ranking to assess the investigation performance of university systems. Scientometrics, 86 (1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0280-y
  • Docampo, D.; Herrera, F.; Luque-Martínez, T.; Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Efecto de la agregación de universidades españolas en el Ranking de Shanghai (ARWU): caso de las comunidades autónomas y los campus de excelencia. El Profesional de la Información, 21 (4), 428-432. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.jul.16
  • Franke, N.; Schreier, M. (2008). A meta-ranking of technology and innovation management/ entrepreneurship journals. Entrepreneurship Journals. Die Betriebswirtschaft (DBW).
  • Grewal, R.; Dearden J. A.; Lilien, G. L. (2008). The University Rankings Game: Modeling the Competition among Universities for Ranking. The American Statistician, 62 (3), 232-237. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313008X332124
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2012). The Effects of Rankings on Student Choices and Institutional Selection. En Jongbloed, B.; Vossensteyn, H. (eds.), Access and Expansion Post- Massification: Opportunities and Barriers to Further Growth in Higher Education Participation. London: Routledge.
  • Hernández, M.; Sureda, B.; Escribano Rodríguez, B.; Carrera, E.; Martínez, J.; A., Aguado, J. C.; Cot, M. y Busquets, P. (2016). Informe sobre la Competència de Sostenibilitat i Compromís Social a la Universitat Politècnica Catalunya.
  • IBM SPSS Advanced Statistics 20.0 (2011).
  • Ishikawa, M. (2009). University rankings, global models, and emerging hegemony. Critical analysis from Japan. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13 (2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308330853
  • Liu, N. C.; Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30 (2), 127- 136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720500260116
  • Luque-Martínez, T. (2013). La actividad investigadora de la universidad española en la primera década del siglo XXI: la importancia del tama-o de la universidad. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 36 (4): e026. doi: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.4.1046
  • Luque-Martínez, T. (2015a). Horizon 2031. The University of Granada in Light of its V Century. Reflections on the Future of the University. Granada (España): Editorial Universidad de Granada. http://biotic.ugr.es/pages/ horizon-2031.
  • Luque-Martínez, T. (2015b). Actividad investigadora y contexto económico. El caso de las universidades públicas españolas. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 38 (1): e076. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2015.1.1135
  • Luque-Martínez, T.; Barrio-García, S. del (2009). Modelling university image: The teaching staff viewpoint. Public Relations Review, 35 (3), 325-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.03.004
  • Luque-Martínez, T.; Barrio-García, S. del (2016). Constructing a synthetic indicator of research activity. Scientometrics, 108 (3), 1049-1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2037-8
  • Marginson, S.; Van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11 (3-4), 306-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303544
  • Olssen, M.; Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20 (3), 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718
  • Rainer Jr, R. K.; Miller, M. D. (2005). Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the ACM, 48 (2), 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1145/1042091.1042096
  • Rauhvargers, A. (2014). Where are the global rankings leading us? An analysis of recent methodological changes and new developments. European Journal of Education, 49 (1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12066
  • Robinson-García, N. (2014). Classifying and visualizing the disciplinary focus of universities. The invisible factor of university ranking. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Granada.
  • Robinson-García, N.; Torres-Salinas, D.; López-Cózar, E. D.; Herrera, F. (2014). An insight into the importance of national university rankings in an international context: the case of the I-UGR rankings of Spanish universities. Scientometrics, 101 (2), 1309-1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1263-1
  • Sanz-Casado, E.; García-Zorita, C.; Serrano-López, A. E.; Efraín-García, P.; De Filippo, D. (2013). Rankings nacionales elaborados a partir de múltiples indicadores frente a los de índices sintéticos. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 36 (3): e012. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.3.1.023
  • Sung, M.; Yang, S. U. (2008). Toward the model of university image: The influence of brand personality, external prestige and reputation. Journal of Public Relations Investigation, 20 (4), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802153207
  • Waltman, L.; Calero-Medina, C.; Kosten, J.; Noyons, E.; Tijssen, R. J.; Eck, N. J.; Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (12), 2419- 2432. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22708
Data source: Dialnet