Drivers for performance in innovative research groupsthe mediating role of transactive memory system

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ackerman, B.P., Izard, C.E., Kobuk, R., Brown, E.D., Smith, C., Relation between reading problems and internalizing behavior in school for pre-adolescent children from economically disadvantaged families. Child Dev. 78 (2007), 581–596.
• Akgun, A.E., Byrne, J.C., Keskin, H., Lynn, G.S., Imamoglu, S.Z., Knowledge network in new product development project: a transactive memory perspective. Inf. Syst. 42 (2005), 1105–1120.
• Akgun, A.E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G.S., Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 53 (2006), 95–111, 10.1109/TEM.2005.857570.
• Alder, N.J., A typology of management studies involving culture. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 14 (1983), 29–47.
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., Zhou, J., Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J. Manag. 40 (2014), 1–37.
• Ardito, L., Messeni, A.P., Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: the moderating role of strategic human resource practices. Eur. Manag. J. 35 (2017), 261–272.
• Austin, J.R., Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 88 (2003), 866–878.
• Baer, M., Frese, M., Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 24 (2003), 45–68.
• Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51 (1986), 1173–1182.
• Bayona, C., García, M.T., Huerta, E., Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Manag. 32 (2002), 321–341.
• Benítez-Ávila, C., Hartmann, A., Dewulf, G., Henseler, J., Interplay of relational and contractual governance in public–private partnerships: the mediating role of relational norms, trust and partners’ contribution. Int. J. Project Manag. 36 (2018), 429–443.
• Bhattacherjee, A., Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test. JMIS 19 (2002), 211–241.
• Bouncken, R.B., Innovation by operating practices in project alliances: when size matters. Br. J. Manag. 22 (2011), 586–608, 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00688.x.
• Brandon, D.P., Hollingshead, A.B., Memoria transactiva en equipos de toma decisiones: implicaciones para la efectividad de equipo. J. Psicothema 18 (2004), 750–756.
• Brown, J.S., Duguid, P., Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12 (2001), 198–213.
• Brown, V.A., Utopian thinking and the collective mind: beyond transdisciplinarity. Futures: J. Pol. Plann. Fut. Stud. 65 (2015), 209–216.
• Byrne, B.M., Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
• Cabeza, P.D., Gutierrez, G.L.J., Llorens, M.J.F., Transactive memory system and TQM: exploring knowledge capacities. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 113 (2013), 294–318.
• Cabeza, P.D., Gutierrez, G.L.J., Llorens, M.F.J., Quality management and collective mind: investigating university R&D from a group focus. Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 28, 2016, 3.
• Cabeza, P.D., Llorens, F.J.M., Gutierrez, L.J.G., Network ties and transactive memory systems: leadership as an enabler. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 38 (2017), 56–73.
• Caldera, A., Debande, O., Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: an empirical analysis. Res. Pol. 39 (2010), 1160–1173.
• Cao, X., Ali, A., Enhancing team creative performance through social media and transactive memory system. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 39 (2018), 69–79.
• Chang, S.J., Witteloostuijn, V., Eden, L., From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41 (2010), 178–184.
• Chen, K.K., Lune, H., Queen, E.L., How values shape and are shaped by nonprofit and voluntary organizations: the current state of the field. Nonprof. Volunt. Sect. Q. 42 (2013), 856–885, 10.1177/0899764013480273.
• Chen, W., Rainie, L., Wellman, B., Networked work. Rainie, H., Wellman, B., (eds.) Networked: The New Social Operating System, 2012, MIT Press, Cambridge, 171–196.
• Chiu, C.H.M., Hsu, M.H., Wang, E.T.G., Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis. Supp. Syst. 42 (2006), 1872–1888.
• Cumming, L.L., Bromiley, P., Kramer, R.M., Tyler, T.R., (eds.) The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and Validation. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 1996, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 302–330.
• Danneels, E., The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strat. Manag. J. 23 (2002), 1095–1121, 10.1002/smj.275.
• Darlington, R., Hayes, A., Regression Analysis and Linear Models: Concepts, Applications, and Implementation. 1st ed., 2016, Guilford Publications.
• De Saá-Pérez, P., Díaz-Díaz, N.L., Aguiar-Díaz, I., Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J.L., How diversity contributes to academic research teams performance. R&D Manag., 47, 2017, 2.
• Dimitrova, D.A., Gruzd, D., Mok, Z., Hayat, G.Y., Mo, B., Wellman, Zhuo, X., NAVEL: studying a networked organization. Kranakis, E., (eds.) Advances in Network Analysis and its Applications, 2013, Springer, Berlin.
• Dolfsma, W., Eijk, R.V., Network position and firm performance – the mediating role of innovation. Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag. 19 (2017), 556–568.
• Dolfsma, W., Van der Eijk, R., Distances in organizations: innovation in an R&D lab. Br. J. Manag. 27 (2016), 271–286, 10.1111/1467-8551.12114.
• Dougherty, D., Takacs, H.C., Team play: the boundary of heedful interrelating for innovation. Long Range Plann. 37 (2004), 569–590.
• Fan, H.-L., Chang, P.F., Albanese, D., Jing-Jyi, W., Ming-Jen, Y., Hao-Jun, Ch., Multilevel influences of transactive memory systems on individual innovative behavior and team innovation. Think. Skills Creat. 19 (2016), 49–59, 10.1016/j.tsc.2015.11.001.
• Fernandez, I., Winter, T., Equipos de alto desempeño: un gran desafío para las organizaciones. Ser. Psicol. Empresa 4 (2003), 1–26.
• Ferres, N., Connell, J., Travaglione, A., Co-worker trust as a social catalyst for constructive employee attitudes. J. Manag. Psychol. 19 (2004), 608–622.
• Fleming, L., Sorenson, O., Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Res. Pol. 30 (2001), 1019–1039.
• Galunic, C.H., Sengupta, K., Louise, P.J., Deus ex machina? Career progress and the contingent benefits of knowledge management systems. Eur. Manag. J., 32, 2014, 1.
• García-Aracil, A., Gutiérrez Gracia, A., Pérez-Marín, M., Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: an empirical case. Scientometrics 67 (2006), 213–230.
• García-Sánchez, P., Díaz-Díaz, N.L., De Saá-Pérez, P., Social capital and knowledge sharing in academic research teams. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., 2017, 1–17.
• Gibson, C.B., Gibbs, J.L., Unpacking the concept of virtuality: the effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 51 (2006), 451–495.
• Gill, H., Boies, K., Finnegan, J., McNally, J., Antecedents of trust: establishing a boundary condition for the relation between propensity to trust and intention to trust. J. Bus. Psychol. 19 (2005), 287–302.
• Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., Amaral, L.A.N., Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308 (2005), 697–702.
• Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L.J., Bustinza Sánchez, O.F., Barrales Molina, V., Six Sigma, absorptive capacity and organizational learning orientation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50 (2012), 661–675.
• Haavisto, P., Observing discussion forums and product innovation: a way to create consumer value?. Case heart-rate monitors. Technovation 34 (2014), 215–222.
• Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Transactive memory systems and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective. Organ. Sci. 26 (2015), 941–959, 10.1287/orsc.2015.0979.
• Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., Okamuro, H., Bridging the cultural divide: trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea. Technovation 34 (2014), 605–616.
• Hewitt-Dundas, N., Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Res. Pol. 41 (2012), 262–275.
• Hite, J., Hesterly, W., The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strat. Manag. J. 22 (2001), 275–286.
• Hollingshead, A.B., Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81 (2001), 1080–1089.
• Hood, A.C., Bachrach, D.G., Zivnuska, S., Bendoly, E., Mediating effects of psychological safety in the relationship between team affectivity and transitive memory systems. J. Organ. Behav. 37 (2015), 307–486, 10.1002/job.2050.
• Hormiga, E., De Saá-Pérez, P., Díaz-Díaz, N.L., Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J.L., The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on the performance of academic research groups: the mediating role of knowledge sharing. J. Technol. Transf. 42 (2017), 10–32.
• Huang, C.C., Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: an empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation 2 (2009), 786–797.
• Huang, C.C., Huang, T.J., Knowledge sharing and KM effectiveness in technology R&D teams: transactive memory system and team-based outcome expectations perspectives. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE IEEM, 2007.
• Hulland, J., Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strat. Manag. J. 20 (1999), 195–204.
• Human, S.E., Provan, K.G., Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: a comparative study of success and demise. Adm. Sci. Q. 45 (2000), 327–365.
• Jarvenpaa, S.L., Leidner, D.E., Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10 (1999), 791–815.
• Jin Bih, H.C.H., Chun, Y., The value creation model of patent market intermediaries. Glob. J. Bus. Res. 9 (2015), 75–86.
• Katzenbach, J.R., Smith, D.K., El Trabajo en Equipo: Ventajas y Dificultades. 2000, Ediciones Granica, SA, Spain.
• Kotlarsky, J., Van den Hooff, B., Houtman, L., Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams. Commun. Res. 42 (2015), 319–344.
• Kvale, H., Brinkman, S., Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Interviewing. 2nd ed., 2009, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Lai, Y., Tsai, W., Industry structuration: innovative behaviors and industrial capability construction in Taiwan bicycle industry. International Conference on Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, Athens, Greece, 2010.
• Lee, J.Y., Bachrach, D.G., Lewis, K., Social network ties, transactive memory, and performance in groups. Organ. Sci. 25 (2014), 1–17.
• Lewis, K., Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psychol. 88 (2003), 587–604.
• Lewis, K., Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: a longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Manage. Sci. 50 (2004), 1519–1533.
• Lewis, K., Herndon, B., Transactive memory systems: current issues and future research directions. Organ. Sci. 22 (2011), 1254–1265.
• Liang, D.W., Moreland, R., Argote, L., Group versus individual training and group performance: the mediating role of transactive memory. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21 (1995), 384–393.
• Liao, J., O'Brien, A.T., Jimmieson, N.L., Lloyd, S., Predicting transactive memory system in multidisciplinary teams: the interplay between team and professional identities. J. Bus. Res. 68 (2015), 965–977.
• Lungeanu, A., Contractor, N.S., The effects of diversity and network ties on innovations: the emergence of a new scientific field. Am. Behav. Sci. 59 (2015), 548–564, 10.1177/0002764214556804.
• Majchrzak, A., More, P.H.B., Faraj, S., Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23 (2012), 951–970.
• Mariano, S., Al-Arrayed, S., Combinations of absorptive capacity metaroutines: the role of organizational disruptions and time constraints. Eur. Manag. J. 36 (2018), 171–182.
• Mattes, J., Formalisation and flexibilisation in organisations: dynamic and selective approaches in corporate innovation processes. Eur. Manag. J. 32 (2014), 475–486.
• Mayer, R., Davis, J., Schoorman, F., An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20 (1995), 709–734.
• McDermott, C.M., Managing radical product development in large manufacturing firms: a longitudinal study. J. Oper. Manag. 17 (1999), 631–644.
• Meo, S.A., Usmani, A.M., Impact of R&D expenditures on research publications, patents and high-tech exports among European countries. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 18 (2014), 1–9.
• Messeni, A.P., The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: a joint-patent analysis. Technovation 31 (2011), 309–319.
• Mitchell, J.C., Boissevain, J., Mitchell, J.C., (eds.) Networks, Norms and Institutions, 1973, Network Analysis, The Hague, Mouton.
• Monge, P.R., Contractor, N.S., Theories of Communication Networks. 2003, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
• Moore, D., McCabe, G.P., Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. 5th ed., 2006, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
• Moreland, R.L., Myaskovsky, L., Exploring the performance benefits of group training: transactive memory or improved communication?. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82 (2000), 117–133.
• Mouzas, S., Henneberg, S., Inter-cognitive representations in business networks. Ind. Market. Manag. 48 (2015), 61–67.
• Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Van Alstine, J., Bennet, N., Lind, S., Stilwell, C.D., Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol. Bull. 105 (1989), 430–445.
• Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S., Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 (1998), 242–266.
• Nunnally, J., Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed., 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Patanakul, P., Pinto, J.K., Examining the roles of government policy on innovation. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 25 (2014), 97–107.
• Pavitt, K., The social shaping of the national science base. Res. Pol. 27 (1998), 793–805.
• Peltokorpi, V., Transactive memory directories in small work units. Person. Rev. 33 (2004), 446–467.
• Peltokorpi, V., Transactive memory system coordination mechanisms in organizations: an exploratory case study. Group Organ. Manag. 39 (2014), 444–471.
• Peltokorpi, V., Hasu, M., The impact of transactive memory systems and transformational leadership on team innovation. Best Papers Proceedings, Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 12–16, San Antonio, USA, 2011.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P., Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65 (2012), 539–569.
• Prajogo, D.I., Hong, S.W., The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: a perspective from South Korean firms. Technovation 28 (2008), 855–863.
• Prajogo, D.I., Sohal, A.S., The integration of TQM and technology and R&D management in determining organizational performance: an Australian perspective. Omega 34 (2006), 296–312.
• Praveen, K.P., Hoegl, M., Muethel, M., Team characteristics and employees’ individual learning: a cross-level investigation. Eur. Manag. J. 33 (2015), 287–295.
• Rasmus, O., Conny, H.A., Phase-specific relationships between team learning processes and transactive memory development. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 24 (2015), 726–741, 10.1080/1359432X. 2014.1000872.
• Ren, Y., Argote, L., Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: an integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5 (2011), 189–229, 10.1080/19416520.2011.590300.
• Rhee, J., Park, T., Hyung-Lee, D., Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: mediation of learning orientation. Technovation 30 (2010), 65–75.
• Robertson, R., Gockel, C., Brauner, E., Trust your teammates or bosses? Differential effects of trust on transactive memory, job satisfaction, and performance. Empl. Relat. 35 (2013), 222–242.
• Roldán, B.M.I., Lloréns, M.F.J., Ruiz, M.A., Open innovation and quality management: the moderating role of interorganisational IT infrastructure and complementary learning styles. Prod. Plann. Control 28 (2017), 744–757.
• Rothaermel, F.T., Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strat. Manag. J. 22 (2001), 687–699, 10.1002/smj.180.
• Ruiz-Jiménez, J.M., Fuentes-Fuentes, M.M., Management capabilities, innovation, and gender diversity in the top management team: an empirical analysis in technology-based SMEs. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 19 (2016), 107–121.
• Ryan, J.C., Hurley, J., An empirical examination of the relationship between scientists’ work environment and research performance. R&D Manag. 37 (2007), 345–354.
• Sánchez, M., Ramón, R.M., Gil, F., San Martín, R., Memoria transactiva en equipos de toma de decisiones: implicaciones para la efectividad de equipo. Psicothema 18 (2006), 750–756.
• Scarbrough, H., Robertson, M., Swan, J., Diffusion in the face of failure: the evolution of a management innovation. Br. J. Manag. 26 (2015), 365–387, 10.1111/1467-8551.12093.
• Serrano-Bedia, A.M., López-Fernández, M.C., García-Piqueres, G., Complementarity between innovation knowledge sources: does the innovation performance measure matter?. BRQ Bus. Res. Q., 2017, 10.1016/j.brq.2017.09.001.
• Spanos, Y., Vonortas, N.S., Voudouris, I., Antecedents of innovation impacts in publicly funded collaborative R&D projects. Technovation 36 (2015), 53–64.
• Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed., 2007, Allyn and Bacon, New York.
• Tamayo-Torres, J., Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L., Ruiz, A., The relationship between exploration and exploitation strategies, manufacturing flexibility, and organizational learning: an empirical comparison between non-ISO and ISO certified firms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 232 (2014), 72–86.
• Taylor, A., Greve, H.R., Superman or the fantastic four?: knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Manage. J. 49 (2006), 723–740.
• Un, C.A., Asakawa, K., Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: the benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain. J. Product Innov. Manag. 31 (2015), 138–153.
• Uribe, A.F., Molina, J.M., Contreras, F., Barbosa, D., Liderar equipos de alto desempeño: un gran reto para las organizaciones actuals. Univer. Empresa 25 (2013), 53–71.
• Vásquez-Urriago, A.R., Barge-Gil, A., Modrego-Rico, A., Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: empirical evidence from Spain. Res. Pol. 45 (2016), 137–147.
• Verdu-Jover, A., Alos-Simo, L., Gomez-Gras, J.M., Adaptive culture and product/service innovation outcomes. Eur. Manag. J., 2017, 10.1016/j.emj.2017.07.004 In press.
• Verona, G., Ravasi, D., Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study on continuous product development. Ind. Corpor. Change 12 (2003), 577–606.
• Wegner, D.M., Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen, B., Goethals, G.R., (eds.) Theories of Group Behavior, 1986, Springer, New York, NY, 185–208.
• Wegner, D.M., Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen, B., Goethals, G.R., (eds.) Theories of Group Behavior, 1987, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 185–208.
• Weick, K., Roberts, K., Collective mind in organizations: heedful relations in flight decks. Adm. Sci. Q. 38 (1993), 357–381.
• West, M.A., Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: an integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Appl. Psychol. 51 (2002), 355–387.
• Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., Griffin, R.W., Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Manage. J. 18 (1993), 293–321.
• Wu, L., Lin, C.Y., Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., Value of social network. Paper Presented at the Winter Information Systems Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2009 Retrieved from http://smallblue.research.ibm.com/projects/snvalue.
• Yoo, Y., Kanawattanachai, P., Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 9 (2001), 187–208.
• Zajac, S., Gregory, M.E., Bedwell, W.L., Kramer, W.S., Salas, E., The cognitive underpinnings of adaptive team performance in ill-defined task situations: a closer look at team cognition. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 4 (2014), 49–73.
• Zand, D.E., Trust and managerial problem solving. Adm. Sci. Q. 17 (1972), 229–239.
• Zhang, Z.X., Hempel, P.S., Han, Y.L., Tjosvold, D., Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 92 (2007), 1722–1730.
• Zhanga, H., Patton, D., Kenney, M., Building global-class universities: assessing the impact of the project. Res. Pol. 42 (2013), 765–775.
• Mackelprang, A.W., Habermann, M., Swink, M., How firm innovativeness and unexpected product reliability failures affect profitability. J. Oper. Manag. 38 (2015), 71–86.