Aspectos organizativos y estructurales de una iniciativa MOOC institucionalel caso de la UGR

  1. Blanco, Ignacio J. 1
  2. Pérez, Raquel 1
  3. Arjona, Emilio 1
  4. Cordón, Óscar 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Journal:
International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies: IJISEBC

ISSN: 2387-0184

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 5

Issue: 1

Pages: 101-110

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies: IJISEBC

Abstract

Universities have a formative responsibility towards their students but they also have a responsibility to return the knowledge generated in them to society. usually, this return of knowledge is carried out through exhibitions, exhibitions and conferences open to the general public. However, all of these outreach activities are geographically limited. for both regulated training and lifelong learning (Lifelong Learning), the MOOC methodology has proven to be an effective way to fulfill this responsibility, both in structured environments and in continuous learning. In any case, the deployment of Open Elearning Resources (OER) and massive online open Courses (MOOCs) by an educational institution entails a responsibility for the institution itself, which makes it necessary to establish certain controls over the quality of the generated product, especially in relation to its structure and the performance of the people who transmit the knowledge and who support such transmission. In this article we review all the aspects referring to the procedures followed for the creation of MOOCs in a particular experience: the MOOCs UGR Initiative.

Bibliographic References

  • abierta.ugr.es (2018a). AbiertaUGR. (https://abierta.ugr.es/)
  • abierta.ugr.es (2018b). (https://abierta.ugr.es/la_alhambra/)
  • abierta.ugr.es (2018c). (https://abierta.ugr.es/curriculum2punto0/)
  • abierta.ugr.es (2018d). (https://abierta.ugr.es/lorca/)
  • abierta.ugr.es (2018e). (https://abierta.ugr.es/emprende/)
  • ceprud.ugr.es (2018). (http://ceprud.ugr.es/)
  • CEVUG (2018). http://cevug.ugr.es/
  • ELGG (2018). (http://elgg.org)
  • Griesbaum, J. (2014). Students as teachers in MOOCs? The double gain of MOOCs as an in-class teaching method experiences from a studentmade MOOC “Online data privacy”. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(1), 29-34
  • Montes, R.; Gea, M.; Gámiz, V. (2018). AbiertaUGR: Diseño, uso y conclusiones de un MOOC en la Universidad de Granada
  • Montes, R.; Gea, M.; et al. (2013). Turning out a social community into an e-Learning platform for MOOC: the case of AbiertaUGR. TEEM '13, November 14 - 15 2013, Salamanca, Spain.
  • Proyecto (2010). “Testing an Open Education Resource Framework for Europe: OERtest”, Erasmus Programme KA3 Virtual Campuses, 510718-LLP-1-2010-ES-ERASMUS-EVC, (http://edunetworks.ugr.es/oertest/)
  • OCW UGR (2018). (http://ocw.ugr.es/)
  • Open Courseware Consortium (2018). (http://www.oeconsortium.org/)
Data source: Dialnet