De la desindustrialización madura a la desindustrialización prematurala dinámica e inflexión del debate teórico

  1. José Antonio Camacho Ballesta
  2. Alexander Alfonso Maldonado Atencio
Revista:
Investigación económica

ISSN: 0185-1667

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 77

Número: 303

Páginas: 130-160

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.22201/FE.01851667P.2018.303.64157 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Investigación económica

Resumen

Resumen: Este artículo tiene por objetivo proporcionar una revisión de la literatura económica del fenómeno de la desindustrialización como una fase del patrón del cambio estructural de la economía global en las últimas décadas. Este análisis permite identificar que la desindustrialización puede ser el resultado tanto de una transición exitosa y positiva como de una transformación patológica y negativa de la economía. Estas son las dos dimensiones fundamentales que determinan el punto de inflexión del fenómeno desde la perspectiva del desarrollo económico: la desindustrialización madura, como una tendencia común del crecimiento económico de los países más avanzados, y la desindustrialización prematura, como patrón estructural de los países en desarrollo. Esta distinción revive el debate sobre la diferencia entre los factores determinantes de la desindustrialización entre las regiones desarrolladas y en desarrollo y advierte sobre el impacto global del rápido proceso de desindustrialización que, de hecho, se ha intensificado con el tiempo, produciéndose cada vez más temprano en el proceso de desarrollo.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aizenman, J.. (2001). De-industrialization and emerging market economies. Journal of Economic Development. 26. 1-13
  • Alderson, A.. (1999). Explaining deindustrialization: Globalization, failure, or success?. American Sociological Association. 64. 701
  • Amirapu, A.,Subramanian, A.. (2015). Manufacturing or Services? An Indian Illustration of a Development Dilemma. Center for Global Development. Washington, DC.
  • Andreoni, A.. (2011). Productive capabilities indicators for industrial policy design. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Viena, Austria.
  • Bernard, A.,Smeets, V.,Warzynski, F.. (2016). Rethinking deindustrialization. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA.
  • Beverelli, C.,Dell’Erba, S.,Rocha, N.. (2011). Dutch disease revisited. Oil discoveries and movements of the real exchange rate when manufacturing is resource-intensive. International Economics and Economic Policy. 8. 139
  • Bogliaccini, J.. (2013). Trade liberalization, deindustrialization, and inequality. Latin American Research Review. 48. 79-105
  • Cantore, N.,Clara, M.,Soare, C.. (2014). Manufacturing as an Engine of Growth: Which is the Best Fuel?. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Viena.
  • (2007). CEPAL Progreso técnico y cambio estructural en América Latina. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile.
  • (2008). CEPAL La transformación productiva 20 años después: viejos problemas, nuevas oportunidades. Trigésimo segundo periodo de sesiones de la CEPAL. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile.
  • Choi, E.. (2005). Infrastructure aid, deindustrialization, and welfare. International Monetary Fund. Washington, DC.
  • Corden, W.,Neary, J.. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. The Economic Journal. 92. 825
  • Cruz, M.. (2014). Premature de-industrialisation: Theory, evidence and policy recommendations in the Mexican case. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 39. 113
  • Dadush, U.. (2015). Is manufacturing still a key to growth?. OCP Policy Center Policy. Rabat, Marruecos.
  • Dasgupta, S.,Singh, A.. (2006). Manufacturing, services and premature deindustrialization in developing countries. UNU-World Institute for Development Economics Research. Helsinki, Finlandia.
  • Felipe, J.,Mehta, A.,Rhee, C.. (2014). Manufacturing matters... but it’s the jobs that count. Asian Development Bank. Manila, Filipinas.
  • Frenkel, R.,Rapetti, M.. (2012). External fragility or deindustrialization: What is the main threat to Latin American countries in the 2010?. World Economic Review. 1. 37-56
  • Ghani, S.,O’Connell, S.D.. (2014). Can service be a growth escalator in low-income countries?. The World Bank. Washington, DC.
  • Guajardo, J.,Molano, M.,Sica, D.. (2016). Industrial Development in Latin America What Is China’s Role?. Atlantic Council Adrienne Arshtlatin America Center. Washington, DC.
  • Hirschman, A.. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. Yale University Press. New Haven.
  • Jenkins, R.. (2015). Is Chinese competition causing deindustrialization in Brazil?. Latin American Perspectives. 42. 42-63
  • Kaldor, N.. (1966). Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom. An Inaugural Lecture. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Kang, S.,Lee, H.. (2011). Foreign direct investment and de-industrialisation. World Economy. 34. 313
  • Kollmeyer, C.. (2009). Explaining deindustrialization: How affluence, productivity growth, and globalization diminish manufacturing employment. American Journal of Sociology. 114. 1644
  • Kucera, D.,Milberg, W.. (2003). Deindustrialization and changes in manufacturing trade: Factor content calculations for 1978-1995. Review of World Economics. 139. 601
  • McMillan, M.,Rodrik, D.. (2011). Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA.
  • Montresor, S.,Marzetti, G.. (2011). The deindustrialisation/tertiarisation hypothesis reconsidered: A subsystem application to the OECD7. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 35. 401
  • Nickell, S.,Redding, S.,Swaffield, J.. (2008). The uneven pace of deindustrialisation in the OECD. World Economy. 31. 1154
  • Pagés, C.. (2010). La era de la productividad: cómo transformar las economías desde sus cimientos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Nueva York.
  • Palma, G.. (2005). Beyond Reforms: Structural Dynamics and Macroeconomic Vulnerability. United Nations-Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Estados Unidos.
  • Palma, G.. (2014). De-industrialization, premature de-industrialization and the Dutch-Disease. Revista NECAT. 3. 7-23
  • Pieper, U.. (2000). Deindustrialization and the social and economic sustainability nexus in developing countries: Cross‐country evidence on productivity and employment. The Journal of Development Studies. 36. 66-99
  • Rello, F.,Saavedra, F.. (2013). Diversificación productiva y transformación estructural en México: estudios de caso de tres regiones. Investigación Económica. 72. 111
  • Rodrik, D.. (2007). Industrial development: Some stylized facts and policy directions. En: United Nations (eds.), Industrial Development for the 21st Century. United Nations. Nueva York.
  • Rodrik, D.. (2008). Normalizing industrial policy. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, DC.
  • Rodrik, D.. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth. 21. 1-33
  • Rowthorn, R.,Coutts, K.. (2004). Deindustrialization and the balance of payments in advanced economies. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 28. 767
  • Rowthorn, R.,Coutts, K.. (2013). De-industrialization and the balance of payments in advanced economies. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. Cambridge, Reino Unido.
  • Rowthorn, R.,Ramaswamy, R.. (1997). Deindustrialization Its Causes and Implications. International Monetary Fund. Washington, DC.
  • Rowthorn, R.,Ramaswamy, R.. (1999). Growth, trade and deindustrialization. IMF Staff Papers. 46. 18-41
  • Rowthorn, R.,Wells, J.. (1987). De‐industrialization and Foreign Trade. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Saeger, S.. (1997). Globalization and deindustrialization: Myth and reality in the OECD. Review of World Economics. 133. 579-608
  • Schettkat, R.,Yocarini, L.. (2003). The shift to services employment: A review of the Literature. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 17. 127
  • Shafaeddin, S.M.. (2005). Trade liberalization and economic reform in developing countries: Structural change or de-industrialization?. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Ginebra, Suiza.
  • Shen, J.,Dunn, D.,Shen, Y.. (2007). Challenges facing US manufacturing and strategies. Journal of Industrial Technology. 23. 2-10
  • Stein, H.. (1992). Deindustrialization, the World Bank and the IMF in Africa. World Development. 20. 83-95
  • Szirmai, A.. (2012). Industrialization as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950-2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 23. 406
  • Szirmai, A.,Verspagen, B.. (2015). Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950-2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 34. 46-59
  • Szirmai, A.,Naudé, W.,Alcorta, L.. (2013). Pathways to Industrialization in the 21 st Century: New Challenges and Emerging Paradigms. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Tan, J.. (2013). Running out of steam? Manufacturing in Malaysia. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 38. 153
  • Tregenna, F.. (2009). Characterising deindustrialisation: An analysis of changes in manufacturing employment and output internationally. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 33. 433466
  • Tregenna, F.. (2011). Manufacturing productivity, deindustrialization, and reindustrialization. UNU-World Institute for Development Economics Research. Helsinki, Finlandia.
  • Tregenna, F.. (2015). Deindustrialization, structural change and sustainable economic growth, Research, Statistics and Industrial Policy Branch. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Viena, Austria.
  • (2003). UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) Trade and Development Report: Capital Accumulation, Growth and Structural Change. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Ginebra.
  • (2013). UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organization) Industrial Development Report 2013. Sustaining Employment Growth: The Role of Manufacturing and Structural Change. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Viena.
  • (2015). UNIDO Industrial Development Report 2016. the Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Viena.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet