Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Escala de Acción Colectiva Ambiental (EACA)

  1. Beatriz Carmona-Moya 1
  2. Isabel Benítez 2
  3. María-Carmen Aguilar-Luzón 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad Loyola Andalucía
    info

    Universidad Loyola Andalucía

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0075gfd51

Journal:
International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

ISSN: 0213-4748 1579-3680

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 34

Issue: 2

Pages: 268-280

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2019.1576322 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

Abstract

The Environmental Action Scale (EAS) analyses engagement in civic actions which seek to have an environmental impact. The EAS has shown adequate psychometric properties when used with English-speaking samples, but there are no studies assessing how it works in other linguistic and cultural groups. The aim of the study is to present the Spanish version of the EAS along with evidence that supports the utility of the scale to be used in the Spanish population. The Spanish version obtained after the adaptation process was first administered to 277 participants. The results pointed to items that did not function adequately, so a revised version was created and administered to 286 participants. Validity evidence based on internal structure showed that the EAS consistently evaluates two dimensions of the construct: Participation Activities and Leadership Activities. Evidence based on relationships with other variables indicated that the construct is also related to other variables, such as environmental identity and moral convictions.

Bibliographic References

  • Alisat, S. & Riemer, M. 2015, "The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation", Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 43, pp. 13-23.
  • Calvo-Salguero, A., Aguilar-Luzón, M.-.-., Salinas-Martínez-de-Lecea, J.-. & García-Martínez, J.-.-. 2014, "Gender, masculinity and femininity as ecocentrism and anthropocentrism predictors / Género, masculinidad y feminidad como predictores del ecocentrismo y el antropocentrismo", Psyecology, vol. 5, no. 2-3, pp. 284-316.
  • Castells, M. & Morell, M. 2004, La Percepción de los Problemas Ambientales y la Visión de Futuro en los Jóvenes Españoles, .
  • Clayton, S. 2003, "Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition", Identity and the Natural Environment, , pp. 45-65.
  • Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. 2007, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, .
  • Davis, J.A. & Smith, T.W. 1996, General Social Surveys, 1972-1996: Cumulative Codebook, .
  • Goodwin, J., Jasper, J.M. & Polletta, F. 2001, Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements, .
  • Hambleton, R.K. & de Jong, J.H.A.L. 2003, "Advances in translating and adapting educational and psychological tests", Language Testing, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 127-134.
  • Matsuba, M.K., Pratt, M.W., Norris, J.E., Mohle, E., Alisat, S. & Mcadams, D.P. 2012, "Environmentalism as a Context for Expressing Identity and Generativity: Patterns Among Activists and Uninvolved Youth and Midlife Adults", Journal of personality, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1091-1115.
  • Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A. & Mielke, R. 1999, "Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory", Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 229-245.
  • Olivos, P. & Aragonés, J.-. 2011, "Psychometric properties of the environmental identity scale (EID)", Psyecology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15-24.
  • Ruiz, C., Marrero, R. & Hernández, B. 2018, "Influence of Emotions on the Acceptance of an Oil Drilling Project", Environment and Behavior, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 324-349.
  • Skitka, L.J., Bauman, C.W. & Sargis, E.G. 2005, "Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?", Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 895-917.
  • Tabernero, C., Hernández, B., Cuadrado, E., Luque, B. & Pereira, C.R. 2015, "A multilevel perspective to explain recycling behaviour in communities", Journal of environmental management, vol. 159, pp. 192-201.
  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. & Spears, R. 2012, "On conviction's collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action", British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 52-71.
  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. & Spears, R. 2008, "Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A Quantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-Psychological Perspectives", Psychological bulletin, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 504-535.
  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Bettache, K. 2011, "Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action", Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 735-753.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L.A. & Tellegen, A. 1988, "Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales", Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1063-1070.
  • Whitmarsh, L. & O'Neill, S. 2010, "Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours", Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 305-314.
  • Wood, G. 2003, "Staying secure, staying poor: The "Faustian bargain"", World Development, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 455-471.
  • Wright, S.C., Taylor, D.M. & Moghaddam, F.M. 1990, "Responding to Membership in a Disadvantaged Group: From Acceptance to Collective Protest", Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 994-1003.