Ciencia-Tecnología-Sociedad vs. STEM¿evolución, revolución o disyunción?
-
1
Universidad de Granada
info
ISSN: 2531-016X
Any de publicació: 2020
Volum: 4
Número: 1
Pàgines: 1-15
Tipus: Article
Altres publicacions en: Ápice: revista de educación científica
Resum
The present work tries to elucidate the possible relations between two educational movements of unquestionable relevance in Science Education throughout the last decades, one of them more pioneer, known as Science-Technology-Society (STS) and another recent, Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM). For this we start from a concretion of its origins, objectives, characteristics, lines of work and didactic proposals in each of them. Then, again supported by a bibliographic review, we establish the comparisons between the two from the sections referred to above. Such comparison leads us to question the relationship between the two and the originality of the STEM proposal, together with the difficulties that its implementation entails.
Referències bibliogràfiques
- Acevedo, J.A. (1995). Educación tecnológica desde una perspectiva CTS. Una breve revisión del tema. Alambique, 3, 75-84.
- Acevedo, J.A. (1996). La Tecnología en las relaciones CTS. Una aproximación al tema. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 14(1), 35-44.
- Acevedo, J. A. (1997). Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad (CTS). Un enfoque innovador para la enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Granada, 10, 269-275.
- Aikenhead, G.S. (2003). STS education: A rose by any other name. En R. Cross (Ed.) A vision for science education: Responding to the work of Peter J. Fensham (pp. 59-75). Saskatoon, Canadá: Routledge Press .
- Bernal, J.D. (1967). Historia Social de la Ciencia. Barcelona: Ed. Península.
- Brickhouse, N.W., Lowery, P., y Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3
- Bybee, R.W. (2013). The case for STEM education challenges and opportunities. National STEM Teachers Association.
- Carlone, H.B. y Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color: Science Identity as an Analytic Lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1087–1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
- Chowdhury, M.A. (2016). The Integration of Science-Technology-Society/Science-Technology-Society-Environment and Socio-Scientific-Issues for Effective Science Education and Science Teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 19-38.
- Domènech-Casal, J. (2018). Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos en el marco STEM: componentes didácticas para la Competencia Científica. Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 21(2), 29-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2018.2.2.4524
- Domènech-Casal, J. (2019). STEM: Oportunidades y retos desde la Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 1(2), 154-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2019.2.2646
- Fensham, P.J. (2016). The Future Curriculum for School Science: What Can Be Learnt from the Past? Research in Science Education, 46(2), 165–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9511-9
- Friedman, T.L. (2005). The World is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Gallagher, J.J. (1971). A broader base for science education. Science Education, 55, 329-338.
- García-Carmona, A. (2008). Relaciones CTS en la educación científica básica. I. Un análisis desde los textos escolares en la enseñanza de la electrónica. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 26(3), 375-388.
- García-Carmona, A. y Criado, A.M. (2008). Enfoque CTS en la enseñanza de la Energía Nuclear: análisis de su tratamiento. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 26(1), 107-124.
- Gordillo, M. Educación con enfoque CTS. Cátedra CTS+I. Perú. Recuperado de: https://docplayer.es/57974752-Catedra-cts-i-peru-modulo-7-profesor-mariano-martin-gordillo.html
- Gordillo, M. (2019). STEAM(E). Escuela. Recuperado de: https://maculammg.blogspot.com/2019/10/steame.html
- Grunwald, A. (2011). Responsible Innovation: Bringing together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 7, 9-31.
- Kelley, T.R. y Knowles, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1-11.
- Kolstø, S.D. (2001). ‘To trust or not to trust…’- pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877- 901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016102
- Kuhn, T. (1961). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
- Land, M.H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317
- Lawrence, C., Yager, R., Sowell, S., Hancock, E., Yalaki, Y. y Jablon, P. (2001). The Philosophy, Theory and Practice of Science-Technology-Society Orientations. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Costa Mesa, CA. Recuperado de: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED472905.pdf
- Lou, S.J., Shih, R.C., Diez, C.R. y Tseng, K.H. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: an exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 195-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8
- MacKinnon, G.R., Kate, G., Rawn, E., Cressey, J. y He, W. (2017). Employing STEM Curriculum in an ESL Classroom: A Chinese Case Study. K-12 STEM Education, 3(1), 143-155. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14456/k12stemed.2017.1
- Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + Art = STEAM. The STEAM Journal, 1(1), Article 34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5642/steam.201301.34
- Mansour, N. (2009). Science-technology-society (STS). A new paradigm in science education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 287-297. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467609336307
- Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F.J. y Vílchez-González, J.M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A systematic review of literature. Science Education, 103, 799-822. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
- Montovani, F. (2020). Noosfera. Recuperado de: http://teilhard.net/noosfera
- Moore, T., Stohlmann, M., Wang, H., Tank, K., Glancy, A. y Roehrig, G. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. En S. Purzer, J. Strobel, y M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policity, and Practices (pp. 35–60). Indiana, USA: Purdue University Press.
- Morin, E. (1990). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Barcelona: Gedisa.
- Polman, J.L. y Miller, D. (2010). Changing Stories: Trajectories of Identification among African American Youth in a Science Outreach Apprenticeship. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 879–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210367513
- RRI Tools (2020). Recuperado de: https://www.rri-tools.eu/es/about-rri
- Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
- Sanders, M. y Wells, J. (2006). Integrative STEM Education Course Syllabi & Instructional Materials: STEM Education Foundations. En STEM Education Trends & Issues, STEM Education Seminar.
- Shaughnessy, J.M. (2013). Mathematics in a STEM Context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324.
- Siu, K.W.M., Wong, Y.L. y Feng, W.W. (2010). Why fail? Experience of technology education in Hong Kong. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8(2), 231-236.
- Solbes, J. y Vilches, A. (1989). Interacciones Ciencia/Técnica/Sociedad: un instrumento de cambio actitudinal. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 7(1), 14-20.
- Strieder, R.B., Bravo-Torrija, B. y Gil-Quílez, M.J. (2017) Ciencia-Tecnología-sociedad: ¿Qué estamos haciendo en el ámbito de la investigación en educación en Ciencias? Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 35(3), 29-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensCiencias.2232
- Toulmin, S. (1972). La comprensión humana. Madrid: E. Alianza.
- Vilches, A., Gil D. y Praia, J. (2011). De CTS a CTSA: Educação por um futuro sustentável. En W. Santos y D. Auler (Eds.), CTS e Educação científica, desafio, tendências e resultados de pesquisa, pp.161-184. Brasilia: Editora UnB.
- Vilches, A. y Gil, D. (2003): Construyamos un futuro sostenible. Diálogos de supervivencia. Madrid: Cambridge University Press.
- Yalaki, Y. (2016). Improving University Students’ Science-Technology-Society-Environment Competencies. International Journal of Progressive Education, 12(1), 90-98.
- Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Simmons, M.L. y Howes, E.V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research‐based frame work for socio scientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
- Zoller, U. (2011). Science and Technology Education in the STES Context in Primary Schools: What Should It Take? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 444-453.
- Zoller, U. (2012). Science Education for Global Sustainability: What is necessary for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Strategies? Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 297-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300047v
- Zoller, U. (2013). Science, Technology, Environment, Society (STES) Literacy for Sustainability: What Should it Take in Chem/Science Education? Educación Química, 24(2), 207-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(13)72464-9
- Zoller, U. y Nahum, T.L. (2012). From Teaching to ‘Know’-to Learning to ‘ink’ in Science Education. En Fraser, B., Tobin, K. y McRobbie, C. (Eds.), 2nd International Handbook of Science Education, 2ª Ed., 1(16), 209-330. Nueva York: Springer International Handbook of Education.