Análisis de patentes y desarrollo territorialEjemplo en el ámbito Biosanitario

  1. Arturo Argüello 1
  2. Víctor Herrero Solana 2
  3. Björn Jürgens 3
  4. Pablo Álvarez 4
  1. 1 Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health. Sevilla
  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info
    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad de Granada
  3. 3 Agency of Innovation and Development of Andalusia, Seville
  4. 4 Bio-Health Research Institute
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Journal of Economic & Business Intelligence

ISSN: 2659-9805

Year of publication: 2020

Issue: 2

Pages: 13-19

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Journal of Economic & Business Intelligence

Sustainable development goals

info

SDG classification obtained using Aurora SDG artificial intelligence model.

Abstract

Europe promotes smart specialization in order to reduce the gap between the different regions in research and innovation, promoting, through these, economic differentiation and transformation. To do this, investments should focus on a small number of priorities according to the characteristics of each region, to maximize efficiency and the impact of spending. Various methodologies have been used to carry out this prioritization. In this work, two types of analysis are proposed, through patents and companies in the same sectors, which provide relevant information, and which can be incorporated into the different prioritization methodologies. It is exemplified for the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical technology sectors.

Bibliographic References

  • Aprahamian, A., & Correa, P. G. (eds.). (2015). Smart specialization in Croatia: Inputs from Trade, innovation, and productivity analysis. Directions in development countries and regions. Washington, DC: World Bank
  • Armeanu, D.S., Vintila,G. and Ghergina S.C. (2017). Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries. Sustainability 10(4), 1-22, DOI: 10.3390/su10010004
  • Carayannis E., Grigoroudis E. (2016) Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 10, no 1, pp. 31–42. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42
  • EPO 1 https://www.epo.org/searching-for-patents/technical/espacenet/gpi.html
  • EU 1 https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/smart_specialisation_es.pdf
  • EU2 Reglamento (UE) n ° 1301/2013 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 17 de diciembre de 2013 , sobre el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional y sobre disposiciones específicas relativas al objetivo de inversión en crecimiento y empleo y por el que se deroga el Reglamento (CE) n ° 1080/2006. En https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32013R1301
  • EU3 https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/smart_specialisation_en.pdf
  • EU4 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/EN/sdg_09_40_esmsip2.htm
  • Fellnhofer, K. (2018). Visualized bibliometric mapping on smart specialization: A co-citation analysis. International Journal of Knowledge-based Development, 9, 76–99. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2018. 090502
  • Gould, D. M. and Gruben, W. C. (1996). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth, Journal of Development Economics, 48 (2), 323–50, DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00039-9
  • OECD. (2013). Innovation-driven growth in regions: The role of smart specialisation. Paris.
  • Park, W. and Ginarte, C. (1997). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(1), 51-61, DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00477.x
  • Pluvia Zuniga, M. and Guelec, D. (2009). Who licenses out patents and why? Lessons from a business survey,
  • OECD Science, Industry and Technology Paper, 2009/5, Paris: OECD, DOI: 10.1787/224447241101
  • Radosevic, S., Curaj, A., Gheorghiu, R., Andreescu, L., & Wade, I. (eds.). (2017). Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization. London: Academic Press.
  • RIS3 Andalucía https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/export/drupaljda/Documento-Ris3-version-final-8-27-02-15.pdf
  • SABI https://sabi.bvdinfo.com/version-2020226/Lo-gin.serv?Code=InvalidIpAddress&LoginParamsClea-red=True&LoginResult=nc&product=sabineo&Re-questPath=home.serv%3fproduct%3dsabineo
  • Schmoch, Ulrich (2008). Concept of a Technology Classification for Country Comparisons: Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.
  • Swan, J. & Scarbrough, H. Knowledge management: Concepts and controversies. J. Manag. Stud. 2001, 38, 913–921.
  • Thomson, M. A. and Rushing, F. W. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Patent Protection on Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Development, 21(2), 61-79, ISSN 0304-3878
  • Wajsman N., Kazimierczak M., Arias C. (2015.) Intellectual Property Rights and Firm Performance in Europe: An Economic Analysis. EUIPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office. En https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/documents/11370/80606/Intellectual+property+rights+and+firm+performance+in+Europe.
  • WIPO 1 https://www.wipo.int/sme/es/ip_business/patents/advantages.htm
  • WIPO 2 Patents as a Source of Technological Information in the Technology Transfer Process. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). Año 2004. En https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=28840
  • WIPO 3 https://www.wipo.int/patentscope/en/programs/patent_landscapes/
Data source: Dialnet