Evaluación de los Sistemas de Mapeo Móvil (MMS) en la documentación gráfica del tholo de El Romeral. (Conjunto Arqueológico Dólmenes de Antequera)

  1. Benavides López, José Antonio 1
  2. Barrera Vera, José Antonio 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Journal:
Arqueología de la arquitectura

ISSN: 1695-2731

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Numero en curso; e096

Issue: 17

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3989/ARQ.ARQT.2020.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Arqueología de la arquitectura

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

This article carries out a comparative analysis of the cutting-edge technology SLAM (Simultaneous Location and Mapping) implemented in mobile mapping systems (MMS). It compares this technology with others well-known recording systems, such as Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) and Structure From Motion (SFM) photogrammetry, and it shows as well its methodological development applied to the tholo of “El Romeral”, an unique prehistoric construction belonging to the Antequera Dolmen Archaeological Site. This research has helped thus to analyse important factors such as geometric accuracy, capturing and processing times, economic viability or quality of the resulting graphic documentation. Being quick and easy, simultaneous mobile mapping technologies make it possible to obtaining better and more complete graphic records of architectural and archaeological heritage, even in those sites considered unfeasible for other technologies. Testing MMS systems on the tholo of “El Romeral” has provided us with a geometric precision similar to the others capture systems. However, the lack of texture of these clouds of points does not allow to analyse standing structures.

Bibliographic References

  • Barrera Vera, J. A. 2006: Aplicación de tecnologías innovadoras en la documentación geométrica del Patrimonio Arquitectónico y Arqueológico. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Sevilla. https://idus.us.es/xmlui/handle/11441/15843
  • Barrera Vera, J. A. y Benavides Lopez, J. A. 2018: “Handheld mobile mapping applied to historical urban areas”, Disegnarecon, 11, pp. 1-14. http:// disegnarecon.univaq.it/ojs/index.php/disegnarecon/article/view/489
  • Benavides López, J. A. 2017: Nuevas tecnologías en la documentación del patrimonio: La alcazaba de Guadix-El castillo de Píñar. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/47477
  • Biosca, J. M., Navarro, S. y Lerma, J. L. 2009: “Estudios previos de fotogrametría en las bóvedas barroca y gótica del presbierio de la Catedral de Valencia”, en C. Pérez García (coord.), Los ángeles músicos de la Catedral de Valencia: estudios previos, pp. 305-312. Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia. Recuperado de: http://jllerma.webs.upv.es/pap021.pdf
  • Bosse, M., Zlot, R. y Flick, P. 2012: “Zebedee: Design of a spring-mounted 3d range sensor with application to mobile mapping”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 28 (5), pp. 1104-1119.
  • Chiabrando, F., D’Andria, F., Sammartano, G. y Spanò, A. 2018: “UAV photogrammetry for archaeological site survey. 3D models at the Hierapolis in Phrygia (Turkey)”, Virtual Archaeology Review, 9 (18), p. 28.
  • Filgueira, A., Arias, P., Bueno, M. y Lagüela, S. 2016: “Novel inspection system, backpack-based, for 3D modelling of indoor scenes”, en Proceedings of the International Conference on Indoor positioning and Navigation, pp. 4-7., Alcalá de Henares. http://www3.uah.es/ipin2016/usb/app/descargas/194_WIP.pdf
  • García-Gómez, I., de Gorostiza, M. F. y Moraza, A. M. 2011: “Láser escáner y nubes de puntos. Un horizonte aplicado al análisis arqueológico de edificios”. Arqueología de la Arquitectura, 8, pp. 25-44.
  • Gonizzi Barsanti, Sara & Remondino, Fabio & Visintini, Domenico. (2012). Photogrammetry and laser scanning for archaeological site 3D modeling - Some critical issues. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 948. B1-B10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286135235_Photogrammetry_and_laser_scanning_for_archaeological_site_3D_modeling_-_Some_critical_issues
  • Karam, S., Vosselman, G., Peter, M., Hosseinyalamdary, S. y Lehtola, V. 2019: “Design, Calibration, and Evaluation of a Backpack Indoor Mobile Mapping System”. Remote sensing, 11 (8), p. 905.
  • Kohlbrecher, S., Meyer, J., Graber, T., Petersen, K., Klingauf, U. y von Stryk, O. 2013: “Hector open source modules for autonomous mapping and navigation with rescue robots”, en Robot Soccer World Cup, pp. 624-631. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Lehtola, V. V., Kaartinen, H., Nüchter, A., Kaijaluoto, R., Kukko, A., Litkey, P., Honkavaara, E., Rosnell, T., Vaaja, M. T. y Virtanen, J. P. 2017: “Comparison of the selected state-of-the-art 3D indoor scanning and point cloud generation methods”. Remote sensing, 9, p. 796.
  • Lerma, J. L., Navarro, S., Cabrelles, M., Seguí, A. E., Haddad, N. y Akasheh, T. 2011. “Integration of laser scanning and imagery for photorealistic 3D architectural documentation”, en Laser scanning, theory and applications, pp. 413-430.
  • Lynen, S., Sattler, T., Bosse, M., Hesch, J. A., Pollefeys, M. y Siegwart, R. 2015: “Get Out of My Lab: Large-scale, Real-Time Visual-Inertial Localization”. Robotics: Science and Systems, 1.
  • Maboudi, M., Bánhidi, D. y Gerke, M. 2017: “Evaluation of indoor mobile mapping systems”, en Proceedings of the GFaI Workshop 3D North East, pp. 125-134. Berlín. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321709273_Evaluation_of_indoor_mobile_mapping_systems
  • Maboudi, M., Bánhidi, D. y Gerke, M. 2018: “Investigation of geometric performance of an indoor mobile mapping system”, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, pp. 637-642. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-637-2018
  • Martín Talaverano, R. 2014: “Documentación gráfica de edificios históricos: principios, aplicaciones y perspectivas”. Arqueología de la Arquitectura, 11, pp. 1-26.
  • Martín Talaverano, R., Cámara Muñoz, L. y Murillo Fragero, J. I. 2018: “Análisis integrado de construcciones históricas: secuencia estratigráfica y diagnóstico patológico. Aplicación en la iglesia de Santa Clara (Córdoba)”. Arqueología de la Arquitectura, 15, e067.
  • Martínez Rubio, J., Fernández Martín, J. J. y San José Alonso, J. I. 2018: “Implementation of 3D scanner and digital photogrammetry in the documentation process of la Merced Church, Panama”. EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica, 23 (32), pp. 208-219.
  • Moon D., Kwon S., Seo J. y Shin J. 2019: “Comparison and utilization of point cloud generated from photogrammetry and laser scanning: 3D world model for smart heavy equipment planning”. Automation in Construction, 98, pp. 322-331.
  • Nocerino, E., Menna, F., Remondino, F., Toschi, I. y Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P. 2017: “Investigation of indoor and outdoor performance of two portable mobile mapping systems”, en Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XIV (10332), p. 103320I. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
  • Previtali, M. y Valente, R. 2019. Archaeological documentation and data sharing: digital surveying and open data approach applied to archaeological fieldworks. Virtual Archaeology Review, 10 (20), pp. 17-27.
  • Remondino, F., Nocerino, E., Toschi, I. y Menna, F. 2017: “A critical review of automated photogrammetric processing of large datasets”. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 42.
  • Rodríguez-Navarro, P. 2012: “La Fotogrametría Digital Automatizada frente a los sistemas basados en sensores 3D activos”, EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica, (17), pp. 100-111.
  • Ruiz Gonzalez, B. 2011: El Conjunto Arqueológico Dolmenes de Antequera: Definición, programación e institucionalización: Documento de avance
  • del Plan Director. Tomo I. Consejería de Cultura. Junta de Andalucia. https://issuu.com/dolmenesdeantequera.ccul/docs/09_conjunto_arqueolo_gico_dolmenes_f3d043e77e7b4d
  • San José Alonso, J. I. 2018: “Levantamiento, tecnología y documentación de la arquitectura”, EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica, 23 (34), pp. 240-251.
  • Sirmacek, B., Shen, Y., Lindenbergh, R., Zlatanova, S. y Diakite, A. 2016: “Comparison of ZEB1 and Leica C10 indoor laser scanning point clouds”. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 143-149.
  • Smith, R., Self, M. y Cheeseman, P. 1990: “Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics”, en Autonomous robot vehicles, pp. 167-193.
  • Springer,.
  • Szeliski, R. 2010: Computer vision: algorithms and applications. Springer Science & Business Media,. http://szeliski.org/Book/drafts/SzeliskiBook_20100903_draft.pdf
  • Tucci, G., Visintini, D., Bonora, V. y Parisi, E. 2018: “Examination of indoor mobile mapping systems in a diversified internal/external test field”. Applied Sciences, 8 (3), p. 401.
  • Zhang, J. y Singh, S. 2014: “LOAM: Lidar odometry and mapping in realtime”, en Proceedings of the Robotics: Science and Systems Conference, pp. 109-111. Berkeley, CA, USA https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/2014/7/Ji_LidarMapping_RSS2014_v8.pdf
  • Zogg, H. M. 2008: Investigations of high precision terrestrial laser scanning with emphasis on the development of a robust close-range 3D-laser scanning system. Doctoral dissertation. ETH Zurich.
Data source: Dialnet