Movement quality evaluation through the functional movement screen in 12- and 13-year-old secondary-school adolescents

  1. Mercedes Vernetta Santana 1
  2. María de Orbe Moreno 1
  3. Eva Mª Peláez Barrios 1
  4. Jesús López Bedoya 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise: JHSE

ISSN: 1988-5202

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 15

Número: 4

Páginas: 918-931

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14198/JHSE.2020.154.18 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise: JHSE

Resumen

Introduction: The achievement of an optimal level of functional parameters by schoolchildren is essential to acquire appropriate motor competence to perform any sport or daily-life activity without difficulty. Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of movement in adolescents using the Functional Movement Screen Test (FMS). Method: 35 schoolchildren between 12 and 13 years old (24 girls and 11 boys) participated in this cross-sectional, descriptive and comparative study. The FMS battery test, consisting of seven tasks of specific movement patterns (deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raises, trunk stability push-up, rotary stability), was applied to evaluate the quality of movement. Results: Girls presented better quality of movement than boys, with an average global score of 16 points, compared to 15 of boys, without significant differences between them. In both girls and boys, the stability variable (hurdle step) showed the highest scores, while the in-line lunge was the test that presented the worst values. After the hurdle step, girls presented the highest values in rotary stability, while boys did in trunk stability. Conclusions: In general, the adolescents presented an acceptable level of movement quality, but would require compensatory exercises to reduce certain imbalances and asymmetries found.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abraham, A., Sannasi, R., & Nair, R. (2015). Normative values for the functional movement screentm in adolescent school aged children. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 10(1), 29.
  • Anderson, B. E., Neumann, M. L., & Bliven, K. C. H. (2015). Functional movement screen differences between male and female secondary school athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29(4), 1098-1106. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000733
  • Bonazza, N. A., Smuin, D., Onks, C. A., Silvis, M. L., & Dhawan, A. (2017). Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(3), 725-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516641937
  • Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2006a). Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT, 1(2), 62.
  • Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2006b). Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT, 1(3), 132–9.
  • Cook, G. (2010). Movement: Functional movement systems: Screening, assessment, corrective strategies. Book Baby.
  • Díaz, J., Salazar, W., & Morera-Castro, M. (2013). Diseño y validación de un instrumento para la evaluación de patrones básicos de movimiento. Motricidad [Design and validation of an instrument for the evaluation of basic movement patterns. Motricity]. European Journal of Human Movement, 31(0), 87-97.
  • Dorrel, B. S., Long, T., Shaffer, S., & Myer, G. D. (2015). Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen as an Injury Prediction Tool Among Active Adult Populations. Sports Health, 7(6), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738115607445
  • Fernández-Pino, J. A., Figueroa-Contreras, D. E., Garcés-Mondría, F. I., Montalva Purcell, B., Olivares, N., & Alonso, R. (2017). Calidad de movimiento evaluado a través del Test FMS en estudiantes de primer año de la carrera de Educación Física durante el año 2016 (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Andrés Bello). http://repositorio.unab.cl/xmlui/handle/ria/3191
  • García Cantó, E. (2010). Niveles de actividad física habitual en escolares de 10 a 12 años de la Región de Murcia (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Murcia).
  • García-Jaén, M., Sellés-Pérez, S., Cortell-Tormo, J., Férriz-Valero, A., & Cejuela, R. (2018). Evaluación de los patrones de movimiento fundamentales en niños: comparación de género en escolares de Educación Primaria (Assessment of fundamental movement patterns in children: a gender comparison on Primary School students). Retos, 0(34), 282-286. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/65097
  • García-Pinillos, F. G., Montilla, J. A. P., Seruendo, L. E. R., Floody, P. D., Salazar, C. M., & Román, P. Á. L. (2019). ¿Do age and sex influence on functional movement in school-age children? Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación, (35), 97-100.
  • Gioscia, G., Beretervide, S., Bermúdez, G., & Quagliatta, D. (2017). Valoración de la condición física en estudiantes de Secundaria de Montevideo y Área Metropolitana, Uruguay. Revista Universitaria de la Educación Física y el Deporte, (10), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.28997/ruefd.v0i10.107
  • Hammes, D., Aus der Fünten, K., Bizzini, M., & Meyer, T. (2016). Injury prediction in veteran football players using the Functional Movement Screen™. Journal of sports sciences, 34(14), 1371-1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1152390
  • Mielgo-Ayuso, J., Aparicio-Ugarriza, R., Castillo, A., Ruiz, E., Ávila, J. M., Aranceta-Batrina, J., & González-Gross, M. (2016). Physical activity patterns of the Spanish population are mostly determined by sex and age: findings in the ANIBES Study. PloS One, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149969
  • Roman, B., Serra-Majem, L., Ribas-Barba, L., Pérez-Rodrigo, C. & Aranceta, J. (2008). How many children and adolescents in Spain comply with the recommendations on physical activity? J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 48(3), 380-7.
  • Ruiz Pérez, L. M. (2000). Aprender a serincompetenteeneducaciónfísica: unenfoquepsicosocial. Apunts. Educación física y Deportiva, 60, 20- 25.
  • Valdes, P., & Yanci Irigoyen, J. (2016). Análisis de la condición física, tipo de actividad física realizada y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de educación secundaria (Analysis of physical fitness, type of physical activity and academic performance in secondary school students). Retos, 0(30), 64-69. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/36862
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet