Polarización y tecnologías de la Informaciónradicales vs. extremistas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aikin, S. F., & Talisse, R. B. (2020). Political Argument in a Polarized Age: Reason and Democratic Life. Cambridge, Polity Press.
• Alfano, M., A. Ebrahimi Fard, J. A. Carter, P. Clutton & C. Klein (2020). “Technologically scaffolded atypical cog-nition: the case of YouTube’s recommender system”. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02724-x
• Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). “Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase po-litical polarization”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 (37), pp. 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). “Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Po-litical Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?”. Psychological Science, 26 (10), pp. 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
• Baron, R. S., Hoppe, S. I., Kao, C. F., Brunsman, B., Linneweh, B., & Rogers, D. (1996). “Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32 (6), pp. 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0024
• Bordonaba, D. (2020). “Los Peligros de Las Cámaras Eco. Nota Crítica de #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media”. Endoxa, 45, pp. 249-260. https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.45.2020.22850
• Bordonaba, D. (2017). Operadores de orden superior y predicados de gusto: Una aproximación expresivista. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/48131
• Boxel, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 26669 http://www.nber.org/papers/w26669.
• Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Berger, W. J., Sack, G., Fisher, S., Flocken, C., & Holman, B. (2017). “Understanding Polarization: Meanings, Measures, and Model Evaluation”. Philosophy of Science, 84 (1), pp. 115–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/688938
• Breton, A., & Dalmazzone, S. (2002). Information Control, Loss of Autonomy, and the Emergence of Political Extre-mism. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511550478.004
• Brown, R. (1986). Social Psychology, the Second Edition. Simon and Schuster: New York.
• Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). “Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (4), pp. 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6
• Carmona, C & Villanueva, N. (manuscrito). Situated judgments as a new model for intercultural communication.
• Carothers, T., & O’Donohue, A. (Eds.). (2019). Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Brookings Institution Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvbd8j2p
• DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). “Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized?”. Ameri-can Journal of Sociology, 102 (3), pp. 690–755. https://doi.org/10.1086/230995
• Druckman, J. N., & Levendusky, M. S. (2019). “What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83 (1), pp. 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz003
• Egan, A. (2010). “Disputing about Taste”, en R. Feldman, & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 247-286https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226078.003.0011
• Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes: Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
• Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). “Political Polarization in the American Public”. Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (1), pp. 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
• Fiorina, M. P. (2017). Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate. Hoover Press.
• González, J. J., & Bouza, F. (2009). Las razones del voto en la España democrática. Madrid: Catarata.
• Google Ngram Viewer (2020). Google Books Ngram Viewer. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=political+polarization&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%-2Cpolitical%20polarization%3B%2Cc0 (última consulta: 01.12.2020)
• Harteveld, E., & Wagner, M. (manuscrito). “Affective polarization across parties: Why do people dislike some parties more than others?”. https://ic3jm.es/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Harteveld_Wagner_Affpol.pdf
• Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. University of Chicago Press. https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/why-washing-ton-wont-work-polarization-political-trust-and-the-gov
• Hume, D. (1826). Of the standard of taste. En The Philosophical Works of David Hume, volumen III, pp. 256–282.
• Isenberg, D. J. (1986). “Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (6), pp.1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States”. Annual Review of Political Science, 22 (1), pp. 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). “Affect, Not Ideology”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76 (3), pp. 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
• Iyengar, S., Westwood, S. J. (2015). “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization”. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (3), pp. 690-707.
• Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2010). Echo chamber Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment.
• Johnston, C. D., Newman, B. J., & Velez, Y. (2015). “Ethnic Change, Personality, and Polarization Over Immi-gration in the American Public”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79 (3), pp. 662–686. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv022
• Kelly, T. (2008). “Disagreement, Dogmatism, and Belief Polarization”. The Journal of Philosophy, 105 (10,), pp. 611–633.
• Klein, E. (2020). Why We’re Polarized. Simon and Schuster: New York.
• Kunda, Z. (1990). “The case for motivated reasoning”. Psychological Bulletin, 108 (3), pp. 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
• Levendusky, M. S. (2018). “When Efforts to Depolarize the Electorate Fail”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82 (3), pp. 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy036
• Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die (First edition). Crown.
• Lynch, M. P. (2016). The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data (1st ed.). Liveright Publishing Corporation: New York.
• Lynch, M. P. (2019). Know-It-All Society: Truth and Arrogance in Political Culture. Liveright Publishing: New York.
• Mackie, D. M. (1986). “Social identification effects in group polarization”. Journal of Personality and Social Psycho-logy, 50 (4), pp. 720–728.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720
• Mason, L. (2013). “The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electora-te”. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 (1), pp. 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463363
• Mason, L. (2015). “I Disrespectfully Agree: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polari-zation”. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (1), pp. 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089
• Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. ht-tps://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001
• Marques, T. (2014). “Disagreement about taste: commonality presuppositions and coordination”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92 (4), pp. 701-723.
• Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press: London.
• Nguyen, C. T. (2020). “Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles”. Episteme, 17 (2), pp. 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press: New York.
• Osorio, J., & Villanueva, N. (2019). “Expressivism and Crossed Disagreements”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Su-pplements, 86, pp. 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246119000092
• Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Group: New York.“Part I. The Need for Greater Party Responsibility” (1950). The American Political Science Review, 44(3), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1950999
• Plunkett, D. (2015). “Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy”, Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 58 (7-8), pp. 828-874.
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
• Stanley, J. (2015). How propaganda works. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
• Sundell, T. (2016). “The tasty, the bold, and the beautiful”. Inquiry, 59 (6), pp. 793–818. https://doi.or-g/10.1080/0020174X.2016.1208918
• Sunstein, C. R. (2002). “The Law of Group Polarization”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10 (2), pp. 175–195. ht-tps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00148
• Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press: Prince-ton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs”. American Journal of Political Science, 50 (3), pp. 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
• Tajfel, H. (1970). “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination”. Scientific American, 223 (5), pp. 96–103.
• Talisse, R. (2019). Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in its Place. Oxford University Press: New York.
• Tanesini, A., & Lynch, M. P. (Eds.). (2020). Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge: London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291395
• Torices, J. (2019). Ranking the world through words: Disagreement, dogwhistles, and expressivism. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/56428
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
• Tufekci, Z. (2018). “YouTube, the Great Radicalizer” (Published 2018). The New York Times. https://www.nyti-mes.com/2018/03/10/opinion/sunday/youtube-politics-radical.html (última consulta: 01.12.2020)
• Valentino, N. A., Banks, A. J., Hutchings, V. L., & Davis, A. K. (2009). “Selective Exposure in the Internet Age: The Interaction between Anxiety and Information Utility”. Political Psychology, 30 (4), pp. 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.x
• Vicario, M. D., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). “The spreading of misinformation online”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (3), pp. 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113
• Viciana H., Hannikainen I. R., Gaitán Torres A. (2019). The dual nature of partisan prejudice: Morality and identity in a multiparty system. PLoS ONE 14(7): e0219509. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0219509
• Wallace, P. (2016). The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581670
• Westwood, Sean J., Iyengar, S. Walgrave, S., Leonisio, R., Miller, L., & Strijbis, O. (2018). The tie that divides: Cross-national evidence of the primary of partyism. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), pp. 333-354.
• Wojcieszak, M., & Garrett, R. K. (2018). “Social Identity, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization: How Priming National Identity Shapes Attitudes Toward Immigrants Via News Selection”. Human Communication Research, 44 (3), pp. 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqx010
• Yardi, S., & Boyd, D. (2010). “Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter”. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011