Effects of acoustic warning signal intensity in the control of visuospatial interference

  1. Paola Cappucci 1
  2. Ángel Correa 1
  3. Rico Fischer 2
  4. Torsten Schubert 3
  5. Juan Lupiáñez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada,Spain
  2. 2 University of Greifswald, Germany
  3. 3 Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg,Germany
Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Alea: 42

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 27-52

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.2478/PSICOLJ-2021-0002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Laburpena

Previous studies have reported increased interference when a task-irrelevant acoustic warning signal preceded the target presentation in cognitive tasks. However, the alerting-congruence interaction was mostly observed for tasks measuring Flanker and Simon interferences but not for Stroop conflict. These findings led to the assumption that warning signals widen the attentional focus and facilitate the processing of irrelevant spatial characteristics. However, it is not clear whether these effects are because of the temporal information provided by the warning signal or because of their alerting effects.Based on these findings, and on the open question about the nature of the warning signal intervention on visuospatial interferences, we decided to test the impact of the warning signal on the processing of irrelevant spatial features, by using a procedure suitable for measuring both Simon and spatial Stroop interferences. We also manipulated the intensity of the warning signal to study the effect of the task-irrelevant characteristics of warning signals in visuospatial interferences. For the Simon conflict, results demonstrated an increased interference provoked by the presence (Experiment 1) and intensity (Experiment 2) of warning signals. In contrast, neither the presence nor the intensity of warning signals affected the spatial Stroop interference.Overall, these findings suggest that the impact of warning signals primarilydepends on the processing of irrelevant spatial attributes and on the type of conflict (e.g., spatial stimulus-response interference in Simon vs. stimulus-stimulus interference in spatial Stroop). In general, acoustic warning signals facilitate the automatic response activation, but their modulatory effect depends on the task setting involved.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Angel, A. (1973). Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747308400338
  • Asanowicz, D. & Marzecová, A. (2017). Differential effects of phasic and tonic alerting on the efficiency of executive attention. Acta Psychologica, 176, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.004.
  • Bertelson, P. (1967). The time course of preparation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19 (3). https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746708400102
  • Böckler, A., Alpay, G., & Stürmer, B. (2011). Accessory stimuli affect theemergence of conflict, not conflict control. A Simon-Task ERP study. Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000073
  • Callejas, A. Lupiáñez, J. & Tudela, P. (2004). The three attentional networks: on their independence and interactions. Brain and Cognition, 54, 225–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.012
  • Callejas, A., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M.J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Modulations among the alerting, orienting and executive control networks. Experimental Brain Research, 167(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2365-z
  • Cappucci, P., Correa, Á., Guerra, P., & Lupiáñez, J. (2018). Differential effects of intensity and response preparation components of acoustic warning signals. Psicológica, 39(2), 292–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/psicolj-2018-0013
  • Correa, Á., Cappucci, P., Nobre, A.C., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). The two sides of temporal orienting: Facilitating perceptual selection, disrupting response selection. Experimental Psychology, 57(2), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000018
  • Coull, J.T., Frith, C.D., Büchel, C., Nobre, A.C. (2000). Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts. Neuropsychologia, 38(6), 808–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00132-3
  • Coull, J.T., Jones, M. E.P., Egan, T.D., Frith, C.D. & Maze, M. (2004). Attentional effects of noradrenaline vary with arousal level: selective activation of thalamic pulvinar in humans. Neuroimage, 22, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.022
  • Egan, J.P., Greenberg, G.Z., & Schulman, A.I. (1961). Interval of time uncertainty in auditory detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908795
  • Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12(10), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001
  • Eriksen, B.A. & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-.search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
  • Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D., Sommer, T., Raz, M., & Posner, M.I. (2002). Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  • Fernandez-Duque, D., & Posner, M.I. (1997). Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting. Neuropsychologia, 35(4), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00103-0
  • Fischer, R., Plessow, F. &Kiesel, A. (2010). Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: Evidence from a Simon Task. Experimental Psychology, 57, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000012
  • Fischer, R., Plessow, F. &Kiesel, A. (2012). The effects of alerting signals in action control: activation of S-R associations or inhibition of executive control processes? Psychological Research, 76, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0350-7
  • Fischer, R., Plessow, F., &Ruge, H. (2013). Priming of visual cortex by temporal attention? The effects of temporal predictability on stimulus(-specific) processing in early visual cortical areas. Neuroimage, 66, 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.091
  • Fuentes, L.J. &Campoy, G. (2008). The time course of alerting effect overorienting in the attention network test. Experimental Brain Research, 185(4), 667–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1193-8
  • Funes, M.J. &Lupiáñez, J. (2003). La teoría atencional de Posner: Una tarea para medir las funciones atencionales de orientación, alerta y control cognitivo y la interacción entre ellas. Psicothema, 15, 260–266.
  • Funes, M.J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2009). Sustained vs. Transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition, 114(3), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.007
  • Funes, M.J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010). Analyzing the Generality of Conflict Adaptation Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017598
  • Hackley, S.A. & Valle-Inclán, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64(1–2), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00101-7
  • Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24(5):1368–1384. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.5.1368
  • Jarosz, A.F. & Wiley, J. (2014). What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167
  • Jaskowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., & Jaroszyk, F. (1994). The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity. Psychological Research, 56(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419712
  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253
  • Lu, C., & Proctor, R.W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959
  • Luo, C., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M., & Fu, X. (2011). The modulation of spatial congruency by object-based attention: Analysing the “locus” of the modulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64 (12), 2455–2469. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F17470218.2011.591935
  • Lupiáñez, J., &Funes, M. (2005). Peripheral spatial cues modulate spatial congruency effects: Analysing the “locus” of the cueing modulation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440540000103
  • Matthias, E., Bublak, P., Müller, H.J., Schneider, W.X., Krummenacher, J. & Finke, K. (2010).The influence of alerting on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 38–56. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0017602
  • McDonald, J., Störmer, V.S., Martinez, A., Feng, W. & Hillyard, S.A. (2013). Salient Sounds Activate Human Visual Cortex Automatically. Journal of Neuroscience, 33 (21), 9194–9201. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5902-12.2013
  • Miller, J., Franz, V., & Ulrich, R. (1999). Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Perception & Psychophysic, 61(1), 107–19. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211952
  • Näätänen, R. (1970). The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. Acta Psychologica, 34, 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(70)90035-1
  • Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opsal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W. &Verguts, T.(2009). Post-error slowing : an orienting account. Cognition, 111(2), 275–279.
  • Notebaert, W. &Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106(2), 1071–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011
  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F00335558008248231
  • Posner, M.I., &Boies, S.J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391–408. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0031333
  • Posner, M. & Petersen, S.E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
  • Posner, M.I., & Wilkinson, R.T. (1969). On the process of preparation. Paper presented to Psychonomic Society (USA).
  • Proctor, R.W. (2011). Playing the Simon game: Use of the Simon task for investigating human information processing. Acta Psychologica, 136(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.010
  • Romei, V., Gross, J., & Thut, G. (2012). Sounds Reset Rhythms of Visual Cortex and Corresponding Human Visual Perception. Current Biology, 22 (9), 807–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.025
  • Romei, V., Murray, M.M., Cappe, C. & Thut, G. (2009). Perperceptual and Stimulus-Selective Enhancement of Low-Level Human Visual Cortex Excitability by Sounds. Current Biology, 19 (21), 1799–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.027
  • Schneider, D.W. (2018). Alertness and cognitive control: Toward a spatial grouping hypothesis. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80(4), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1491-1
  • Schneider, D.W. (2019). Alertness and cognitive control: is there a spatial attention constraint? Attention, Perception and Psychophysic, 81(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01690-y
  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., and Zuccolotto, A. (2012). E-Prime User’s Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc..
  • Seibold, V.C. (2018). Do alerting signals increase the size of the attentional focus? Attention, Perception & Psychophysic, 80(2), 402–425. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1451-1
  • Simon, J.R., &Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: The “Stroop effect” vs. the “Simon effect.” Acta Psychologica, 73(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90077-S
  • Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology,51(3), 300–304. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0020586
  • Simon, J.R., & Small, A.M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0028034
  • Soutschek, A., Müller, H.J. & Schubert, T. (2013). Conflict-specific effects of accessory stimuli on cognitive control in Stroop task and Simon task. Experimental psychology, 60(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000181
  • Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 643–662. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.15
  • Thiel, C.M., Zilles, K., & Fink, G.R. (2004). Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: An event related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 21, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.044
  • Torres-Quesada, M., Funes, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure. Acta Psychologica, 142(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.015
  • Weinbach, N., &Henik, A. (2011). Phasic alertness can modulate executive control by enhancing global processing of visual stimuli. Cognition, 121, 454–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.010
  • Weinbach, N. & Henik, A. (2012). The relationship between alerting and executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1530–1540. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0027875
Datuen iturria: Dialnet